Abstract
Levinas’s account of a person’s relation to an Other parallels second-person engagement at a pre-cognitive level of subjectivity. The goal of this study is to explore the relations of Levinas’s ethics and James’s pragmatism. A person’s encounter with an Other startles and makes one aware of their own limitations and creates for oneself a sense of insecurity. A face-to-face encounter compels one to awake to a responsibility for the care of an Other. In this relation with the Other, one becomes aware of a third person outside that ethical relation and that oneself is a third person, and the collection of third persons creates a society. One’s freedom to act and commit to an ethical relation is also a freedom to turn away from it in violence. It is realized that one has the freedom to avoid violence and preserve freedom only by communicating with other third persons of society and arranging for an impersonal rational state. A balance is arranged between the individuality of the person and the impersonal state which ignores individuality. The result is that one’s freedom is limited and preserved. The pluralistic reality of experience implies that a person’s actions can be determined ethical only in retrospect. It is determined in the flow of subjectivity through intersubjective space with an Other. The ethical nature of an act emerges in the context of the particular circumstances of a situation. The implication for psychology is a greater attention to intersubjective space.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arendt, H. (1971). The life of the mind: Vol. One. Thinking (p. 258). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Baker, L. R. (2013). Naturalism and the first-person perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Colapietro, V. M. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity (SUNY series in philosophy. (Xxi, p. 141)). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Craig, M. (2010). Levinas and James: Toward a pragmatic phenomenology (American philosophy. (Xxv, p. 247)). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Davis, C. (1996). Levinas: An introduction. (Viii, p. 168). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Dennett, D. C. (2003). Who’s on first: Heterophenomenology explained. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10.Consciousness Explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
Dennett, D. C. (2001, March 1). The Fantasy of First-Person Science. [Retrieved from http://ase.tufts.edu/cog-stud/papers/chalmersdeb3dft.htm (January 2016)]. (Third Draft.) Retrieved from http://ase.tufts.edu/cog-stud/papers/chalmersdeb3dft.htm (January 2016)
Dilthey, W. (1988). Introduction to the human sciences: An attempt to lay a foudation for the study of society and history. (Original 1923 & R. J. Betanzos, Trans.) (p. 386). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press..
Duus, R. (2017, May). Personhood and first-person experience. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 37(2), 109–127.
Ganeri, J. (2012). The self: Naturalism, consciousness, and the first-person stance. (Xii, p. 374). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. (W. R. B. Gibson, Trans.) (1962) (p. 446). New York, NY: Collier Books.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (1983) (1302 pages). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, W. (1897). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy (Dover Edition 1956) (p. 329). New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc. Retrieved from www.doverpublications.com
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religous experience: A study in human nature (1961) (p. 416). New York, NY: Collier Books.
James, W. (1909). A pluralistic universe [2009 NuVisions]. Sioux Falls, SD: NuVisions. (p. 155). Retrieved from www.nuvisionpublications.com
James, W. (1911). Some problems of philosophy: A beginning of an introduction to philosophy. New York, NY: Longmans, Green, and Co.
James, W. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism [2010 Echo Library] (p. 111). Fairford, Glos. AL7 4BX: Echo Library. Retrieved from http://www.echo-library.com
Kant, I. (1788/2004). The critique of practical reason (Translation 1889 by T.K. Abbot) (10). Project Gutenberg [http://www.gutenberg.org/]. (EBook)
Kirschner, S., & Martin, J. (Eds.). (2010). The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (p. 312). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (Alphonso Lingis) (1st published in French in 1961) (p. 314). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1978). Existence and existents (A. Lingis, Trans., R. Bernasconi, Foreword) (Xxvii, p. 113). The Hague, NL: Nijhoff.
Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.) [1998, paperback] (Xlviii, p. 205). Dordrecht, NL: M. Nijhoff.
Levinas, E. (1987). Collected philosophical papers (A. Lingis, Trans.) (Second Edition 1993) (Xxxi, p. 186). Phaenomenologica. Dordrecht, NL/Boston, MA: Nijhoff; Hingham, MA,: Distributors for the United States and Canada, Kluwer Academic.
Levinas, E. (1996). In A. T. Peperzak, S. Critchley, & R. Bernasconi (Eds.),. Studies in Continental thought Emmanuel Levinas: Basic philosophical writings (Xx, p. 201). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
McDermott, J. J. (Ed). (1977). The writings of William James: A comprehensive edition, including an annotated bibliography updated through 1977 (w. a. i. a. n. pref. & b. J. J. McDermott, edited) (pp. liv, 858 p.). A Phoenix book. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McKenna, M., & Coates, D. J. (2016). Compatibilism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/compatibilism/
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Primacy of perception (Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy) [Paperback] (Colin Smith) (1962). (228 pp). Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ Press.
O’Connor, T., & Franklin, C. (2016). Free will. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/freewill/
Peirce, C. S. (1998). In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.),. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project The essential peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 1 of 2, p. 584). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Quine, W. (1969). Ontological relativity and other essays. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception, and reality. (1991 Paperback) (p. 337). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing.
Wiley, N. (1994). The semiotic self (Xiii, p. 250). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duus, R.E. (2020). Ninth Study: Ethics, Responsibility, and the Other. In: Constituting Selves. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39017-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39017-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39016-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39017-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)