Abstract
The Third Study explores the two sides of identity, one that is apprehended from the inside and which is known inwardly in contrast to the identity viewed from the outside, the side of society. Included is the objective, third-person, impersonal view of a generalized other of the social group one participates. Self and identity are distinctively different aspects of a person. Investigations of psychological science of identity are empirically easier than investigations of the more indefinite nature of self so that self and related issues are often obscured or ignored. The reality is that we live in the social world by means of identity. The Greeks articulated a recognition that the physical body and its physical environment changes while one’s identity persists and maintains a property of sameness. Christian thinking transformed identity by creating an internal dimension to a self and a person became responsible for their own moral behavior. One’s identity was that of a free and responsible person in pursuit of moral perfection. The idea of an autonomous person responsible for their own behaviour was strengthened in the subsequent centuries, and in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries when the understanding of self and identity became what can be described as naturalized. The mind and cognition is emphasized so that a person is identified as a knower with a capacity and, perhaps, responsibility to understand the mechanistic world. The last step of this naturalization process was firmly put in place by John Locke who showed how one’s identity was formed in social relationships. The consequence of emphasizing relationship in forming one’s identity, and a self, was that a soul is no longer necessary to be a person. William James describes the modern form of identity, and the self, in an intrinsic psychology in a context of first-person perspective that makes clear the sameness properties of identity. Summarily, “identity is the heart of human life.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See the First Study for parallel conversations concerning Augustine in Jerrold Seigel (2005) and Charles Taylor (1989).
References
Appiah, K. A. (2005). The ethics of identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Armstrong, K. (2006). The great transformation: The beginning of our religious traditions. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Baker, L. R. (2000). Persons and bodies: A constitution view (xii, p. 233).. Cambridge studies in philosophy). Cambridge, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, L. R. (2013). Naturalism and the first-person perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society [1963 and 1985 with afterward.] (35th Anniversary Edition, p. 445). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 15–31.
Gallois, A. (2015, December 30). Identity over time. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition). Retrieved from <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/identity-time/>
Ganeri, J. (2012). Identity as reasoned choice: A South Asian perspective on the reach and resources of public and practical reason in shaping individual identities (p. 240). (Paperback 2013). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gergen, K. J. (2010). Beyond the enlightenment: Relational being. In S. R. Kirschner & J. Martin (Eds.), Sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 68–87). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Goodman, D. M., & Collins, A. (2019). The streaming self: Liberal subjectivity, technology, and unlinking. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(3), 147–150. Retrieved from http://dx.org/10.1037/teo0000111
Gopnik, A. (2009). Could David Hume Have Known about Buddhism? Charles Francois Dolu, The Roray College of LaFleche, and the Global Jesuit Intellectual Network. Hume Studies, 35(1–2), 2–28.
Gopnik, A. (2015, October). How a eighteenth century philosopher helped solve my midlife crises: David Hume, the Buddha, and a search for the Eastern roots of the Western enlightenment. The Atlantic, October 2015. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/10/how-david-hume-helped-me-solve-my-midlife-crisis/403195/
Hermans, H. J. M. (2003). The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16, 89–130.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Salgado, J. (2010). The dialogical self as a minisociety. In S. R. Kirschner & J. Martin (Eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 183–204). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world (Xi, p. 268). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (1983) (p. 1302). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
James, W. (1892). Psychology: Briefer course (1948) (p. 478). New York, NY: World Publishing Company.
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study of human nature (Wayne Proudfoot Introduction and Notes, 2004 ed.) (p. 476). New York, NY: Barnes and Nobles Classics.
Korfmacher, C. (2015, June 28). Personal identity. In Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/person-i/
Martin, R., & Barresi, J. (Eds.). (2003). Personal identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
Martin, R., & Barresi, J. (2006). The rise and fall of soul and self: An intellectual history of personal identity (p. 383). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Thompson, J. (2003). Psychology and the question of agency SUNY series, alternatives in psychology (X, p. 186). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Journal of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist.. (1962) (p. 401). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Noonan, H., & Curtis, B. (2014). Identity. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/identity/>
Perls, F., Hefferline, R. F., & Goodman, P. (1951). Gestalt therapy: Excitement and growth in the human personality. New York, NY: Dell Publishing Company.
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another (K. Blamey, Trans.) (pp. 374). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Robinson, D. N. (2002). Inventing the subject: The renewal of “Psychological” psychology. Journal of Anthropological Psychology, 11, 2–11.
Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-Centered therapy. London, UK: Constable and Company Limited.
Shoemaker, D. (2014). Personal identity and ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/identity-ethics/>.
Smith, R. (2013). Between mind and nature: A history of psychology. London, UK: Reaktion Books Ltd..
Sugarman, J., & Martin, J. (2010). Agentive hermeneutics. In S. R. Kirschner & J. Martin (Eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 158–179). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries (p. 215). Public planet books. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2002). First-person thoughts and embodied self-awareness: Some reflections on the relation between recent analytical philosophy and phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(1), 7–26.
Zahavi, D. (2009, December). Is the self a social construct? Inquiry, 52(6), 551–573.
Zahavi, D., & Kriegel, U. (2015). FOR-ME-NESS: What it is and what it is not. In A. E. D. O. Dahlstrom & W. Hopp (Eds.), Philosophy of mind and phenomenology: Conceptual and empirical approaches (p. 15). London, UK: Routledge Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duus, R.E. (2020). Third Study: Identities of a Person. In: Constituting Selves. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39017-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39017-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39016-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39017-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)