Skip to main content

Can Contemporary Art Galleries Be Ranked? A Sociological Attempt from the Paris Case

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sociology of Arts and Markets

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Arts ((SOA))

Abstract

In order to bring more light on French contemporary art galleries, we decided not only to try and define their population but also to rank them. We thus address two key questions: What should be the criteria for the ranking of art galleries and what does it reveal about the structure of contemporary art galleries in France? The analysis shows a general link between a first set of factors related to the economic integration of the galleries and the degree of reputation of their artists, although some exceptions are met. It also unveils a strong hierarchy between contemporary art galleries in France with a very significant presence of galleries of foreign origin in the first ranks, as a direct consequence of the high degree of internationalisation of the art market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the opposite, the part played by art criticism tends to be always more secondary, not to say minor.

  2. 2.

    To be selected to participate in an art fair, galleries fill in an application file that presents their “line” and their project for the fair. What is eventually evaluated is their “quality”, a notion that is always rather vague in the contemporary art world (Misdrahi 2013).

References

  • Becker, Howard S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhamou, Françoise. 2003. L’Économie de la culture. Paris: La Découverte, collection Repères.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre et al., The Love of Art. European Art Museums and their Public, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991 (1966 for the original version in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowness, Alan. 1989. The Conditions of Success. How the Modern Artist Rises to Fame. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckermann, Paul. 2016. Back from Business: On Commensuration, Construction, and Communication of a Global Art World in the Ranking Kunstkompass. Kapsula 3 (1): 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buscatto, Marie. 2007. Femmes du jazz. In Musicalités, féminités, marginalités. Paris: CNRS Éditions.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Piles, Roger. 1708. Cours de Peinture par Principes, Genève, Slatkine Reprints, 1969 (édition originale: Cours de Peinture par Principes composé par Mr. de Piles, Paris, Jacques Estienne (Amsterdam and Leipzig: Arkstée & Merkus, 1766)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, Harvey. 1950. Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer Demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics 64 (2): 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert. 1968. “The Matthew Effect”. Science Vol. 159, n°381: 56-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misdrahi Flores, Marian. 2013. L’évaluation des pairs et les critères de la qualité au Conseil des arts et des lettres du Québec. Le cas des arts visuels contemporains, Montréal, thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Edgar. 1957. Les stars. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, Raymonde. 1967. Le marché de la peinture en France. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. L’artiste, l’institution et le marché. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Espeland, Wendy & Michael Sauder. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds”. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 11, n° 1: 1-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, Henri. 2004. Les méthodes en sociologie: l’observation. Paris: La découverte.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quemin, Alain. 2013a Les stars de l’art contemporain. Notoriété et consécration artistiques dans les arts visuels. Paris: éditions du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. International Contemporary Art Fairs in a “Globalized” Art Market. European Societies 15 (2): 162–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Sociology of Art. In Cambridge Handbook of Sociology, ed. Kathleen Korgen, 293–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 30).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, Daniel. 1949. The Matthew Effect. How Advantage Begets further Advantage. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouet, François. 2013. Les galeries d’art contemporain en France en 2012. Paris: DEPS, Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, Culture études.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Rijt, Arnout, Eran Shor, Charles Ward, and Steven Skiena. 2013. Only 15 Minutes? The Social Stratification of Fame in Printed Media. American Sociological Review 78 (2): 266–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasari, Giorgio. 1550. Le Vite de’ più eccellenti pittori, scultori, e architettori da Cimabue insino a’ tempi nostril [The Lives of the Most Excellent Italian Painters, Sculptors, and Architects, from Cimabue to Our Times]. Florence: Lorenzo Torrentino.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Quemin, A. (2020). Can Contemporary Art Galleries Be Ranked? A Sociological Attempt from the Paris Case. In: Glauser, A., Holder, P., Mazzurana, T., Moeschler, O., Rolle, V., Schultheis, F. (eds) The Sociology of Arts and Markets. Sociology of the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39013-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39013-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39012-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39013-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics