Abstract
Dealers advocating contemporary art occupy a crucial position in the art world, as they often initiate the processes of reception and commodification of art. Despite the importance of the phenomenon of galleries, little is known about the dispositions and interpretative patterns that structure their owners’ professional practice and enable them to commit to their delicate task. A reconstruction of such concepts was conducted by means of contrasting case studies based on interviews and the biographical data of European and American gallery owners. The contribution outlines a typology of gallery owners active in the global art market: the operator, the companion, the curator-gallerist, and the adviser.
I thank Greg Michael Sax for his meticulous reading of the text.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
As of 2005, the president of the Art Dealers Association of America ridiculed the denomination: “Frankly, I’m not acquainted with it. I hope anyone calling himself a gallerist has a medical degree.” (The New York Times, 24 December 2005). “Gallerist” omits, as does “gallery owner”, the commercial aspect of the role and emphasises its public function. “Art dealer”, which captures the dual nature of the profession, is still very common in English and denotes gallery owners active both in the primary and the secondary markets. However, “gallerist” is increasingly used – notably by actors who advocate contemporary (“cutting edge”) art – to distinguish innovative gallery owners committed to living artists and pure, that is, secondary market “dealers” (see Sect. 2). This introduction of a new denomination, meant to suggest distance from the commodifying role associated with “dealer”, is similar to an earlier evolution in other languages, such as French and German (Gautier 2019, 37–38; Loichinger 2014).
- 3.
- 4.
“Even where the experiencing subject believes that ‘insights’ and ‘designs’ come to him from himself alone, ‘inspirationally’ and ‘in a flash’, they nevertheless originate in collective fundamental designs, which are alive in him as well, although he is not self-reflectively conscious of it. It is, however, one of the most important tasks of the sociology of thinking to press on to the level of collective designs – which sustains itself, as it were, behind the individual’s back, not entering into self-reflective consciousness – and to bring out the deeper contextures of discrete individual observations which come about within an age or current” (Mannheim 1986, 51).
- 5.
All translations of quoted German are by M. G.
- 6.
See also Schumpeter (2011b, 241–246).
- 7.
The interviewees’ names have been changed; the country indicates a gallery’s location.
- 8.
- 9.
“Whereas mere common ‘location’ in a generation is of only potential significance, a generation as an actuality is constituted when similarly ‘located’ contemporaries participate in a common destiny and in the ideas and concepts which are in some way bound up with its unfolding. Within this community of people with a common destiny there can then arise particular generation-units. These are characterized by the fact that they do not merely involve a loose participation by a number of individuals in a pattern of events shared by all alike though interpreted by the different individuals differently, but an identity of responses, a certain affinity in the way in which all move with and are formed by their common experiences” (Mannheim 1952, 306).
References
Becker, Howard S. 2008 (1982). Art Worlds, 25th Anniversary Edition, Updated and Expanded. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Belting, Hans. 2010. Was bitte heisst “contemporary”? Die Zeit, 31 May 2010.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. Essays on Art and Literature. Edited and introduced by Randal Johnson. New York City: Columbia University Press.
———. 1996. The Rules of Art. Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———. 2010 (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Boston: Sage Publications.
Garz, Detlev, and Uwe Raven. 2015. Theorie der Lebenspraxis. Einführung in das Werk Ulrich Oevermanns. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Gautier, Michael. 2019. Passion und Kalkül. Zur beruflichen Bewährung in der Galerie. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus Verlag.
Graw, Isabelle. 2015. Art Good, Market Evil? Isabelle Graw on False Polarities and Economic Subtexts. Texte zur Kunst. https://www.textezurkunst.de/articles/art-good-market-evil. Accessed 13 July 2018.
Loichinger, Hannes. 2014. Trading Notions. Texte zur Kunst 96: 65–81.
Mannheim, Karl. 1952 (1923). The Problem of Generations. In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, 276–322. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
———. 1986. Conservatism. A Contribution to the Sociology of Knowledge. Ed. David Kettler, Volker Meja, and Nico Stehr. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Moulin, Raymonde. 1987. The French Art Marke. A Sociological View. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Münte, Peter, and Claudia Scheid. 2017. Coping with Crises: A Neo-Classical View on Professions. Professions & Professionalism 7, no 1 (Special Issue: Theoretical Perspectives on Sociology of Professions in Germany): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.1618.
Oevermann, Ulrich. 1991. Genetischer Strukturalismus und das sozialwissenschaftliche Problem der Erklärung der Entstehung des Neuen. In Jenseits der Utopie. Theoriekritik der Gegenwart, ed. Stefan Müller-Doohm, 267–335. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
———. 1996. Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handels. In Pädagogische Professionalität. Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns, ed. Arno Combe et al., 70–182. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
———. 1997. Der Galerist – Versuch einer soziologischen Strukturanalyse. In Hommage an Horst Appel. Von Avramidis bis Zorio (Frankfurter Kunstverein, 5.12.1997–31.10.1998), 78–85. Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurter Kunstverein.
———. 2000. Die Methode der Fallrekonstruktion in der Grundlagenforschung sowie der klinischen und pädagogischen Praxis. In Die Fallrekonstruktion. Sinnverstehen in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung, ed. Klaus Kraimer, 58–156. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
———. 2001. Die Struktur sozialer Deutungsmuster – Versuch einer Aktualisierung. Sozialer Sinn. Zeitschrift für hermeneutische Sozialforschung 1: 35–81.
Parsons, Talcott. 1991 (1951). The Social System. Abingdon: Routledge.
Parsons, Talcott, and Edward A. Shils, eds. 2008 (1951/1953). Toward a General Theory of Action. Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Schallberger, Peter. 2002. Unternehmerisches Handeln und Charisma. Eine Fallrekonstruktion (manuscript). Frankfurt am Main: Institut für Sozialforschung.
———. 2007. Erosion der Leistungsethik? Fallrekonstruktiv-empirische Befunde am Beispiel von Unternehmensgründern. In Bildung und Beschäftigung. Beiträge der internationalen Konferenz in Bern, ed. Martine Chaponnière et al., 59–74. Zurich and Chur: Rüegger Verlag.
Schultheis, Franz, Erwin Single, Stephan Egger, and Thomas Mazzurana. 2015. When Art Meets Money. Encounters at the Art Basel. Cologne: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König.
Schultheis, Franz, Erwin Single, Raphaela Köfeler, and Thomas Mazzurana. 2016. Art Unlimited? Dynamics and Paradoxes of a Globalizing Art World. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 2011a (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. In The Entrepreneur. Classic Texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter, ed. Markus C. Becker et al., 79–154. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
———. 2011b (1928). Entrepreneur. In The Entrepreneur. Classic Texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter, ed. Markus C. Becker et al., 227–260. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
———. 2011c (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. In The Entrepreneur. Classic Texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter, ed. Markus C. Becker et al., 43–78. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
Veblen, Thorstein. 2009 (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Velthuis, Olav, and Stefano Baia Curioni. 2015. Making Markets Global. In Cosmopolitan Canvases. The Globalization of Markets in Contemporary Art, ed. Olav Velthuis and Stefano Baia Curioni, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weber, Max. 1976 (1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: George Allen and Unwin.
———. 2012. The ‘Objectivity’ of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy. In Collected Methodological Writings, ed. Hans Henrik Bruun and Sam Whimster, 100–138. London and New York: Routledge.
———. 2013 (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Wernet, Andreas. 2014. Hermeneutics and Objective Hermeneutics. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. Uwe Flick, 234–246. London: Sage Publishing.
White, Harrison C., and Cynthia A. White. 1993 (1965). Canvases and Careers. Institutional Change in the French Painting World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Wuggenig, Ulf. 2007. The Dealer as a Genius? The Creative Industries Approach and the History of 19th Century Revolutionary Art. Framework – The Finnish Art Review, Issue 6: 26–29.
Zahner, Nina Tessa. 2017. Die Heteronomien des Marktes. Eine Rekonstruktion der Diagnosen zur Ökonomisierung der Kunst. In Autonomie der Kunst? Zur Aktualität eines gesellschaftlichen Leitbildes, ed. Uta Karstein and Nina Tessa Zahner, 139–164. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gautier, M. (2020). Mapping the Professional Self-Concepts of Gallery Owners: A Typology. In: Glauser, A., Holder, P., Mazzurana, T., Moeschler, O., Rolle, V., Schultheis, F. (eds) The Sociology of Arts and Markets. Sociology of the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39013-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39013-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39012-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39013-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)