Abstract
First as a candidate then as president, Donald Trump understood the power of disintermediation that allows him to speak directly to a wide audience, in a process which is crucially amplified by mass media. He talks to the public through his tweets, cutting out the mainstream media. He is by-passing the whole complex of advisers, pollsters, and traditional journalistic filters. He has further understood that mainstream citizens live in filter bubbles in which we each choose our own news and, dangerously, our own facts. In looking at the variation among US presidents in the forums they choose to communicate to the press and to answer reporters’ questions, this chapter argues that Donald Trump is truly the first disintermediating US president. This chapter also sheds light on the ways in which Twitter is affecting the course of modern American politics, 140 characters at a time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmadian, S., Azarshahi, S., & Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Explaining Donald Trump Via Communication Style: Grandiosity, Informality, and Dynamism. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 49–53.
Anderson, B. (2017). Tweeter-in-Chief: A Content Analysis of President Trump’s Tweeting Habits. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 8(2), 36–50.
Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National Politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3), 291–314.
Barthel, M., Gottfried, J., & Mitchell, A. (2017). Most Say Tensions Between Trump Administration and News Media Hinder Access to Political News. Retrieved March 15, 2019, from http://www.journalism.org/2017/04/04/most-say-tensions-between-trump-administration-and-news-media-hinder-access-to-political-news/
Bonato, A., & Roach, L. (2018, July 29). The Math Behind Trump’s Tweets. The Conversation. Retrieved April 16, 2019, from https://theconversation.com/the-math-behind-trumps-tweets-100314
CBS Sunday Morning. (2017, March 26). A Polarized America. Retrieved August 10, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hhx4B9_9HuI
Chadwick, A. (2006). Disintermediation. In M. Bevir, C. Ansell, N. Choi, C. Hay, A. Smith, R. Wilkinson, & L. Zanetti (Eds.), Sage Encyclopedia of Governance (pp. 232–233). New York: Sage.
Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2016). Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Parties and Election Campaigns: Party Decline Or Party Renewal? International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 283–294.
CNN. (2016, April 13). Trump Family Interviewed by Anderson Cooper at the CNN Republican Presidential Town Hall. Retrieved July 21, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6g_bFgMI5A
Davis, J., & Rosenberg, M. (2017, January 21). With False Claims, Trump Attacks Media on Turnout and Intelligence Rift. The New York Times. Retrieved December 28, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/us/politics/trump-white-house-briefing-inauguration-crowd-size.html?mcubz=0
Gabler, N. (2016, April 29). Donald Trump, the Emperor of Social Media. Moyers & Company. Retrieved March 3, 2019, from http://billmoyers.com/story/donald-trump-the-emperor-of-social-media/
Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016, May 26). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016. PewResearchCenter. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hersak, D. (2017). Donald Trump Tweets. Retrieved August 6, 2019, from https://www.kaggle.com/doughersak/donald-trumptweet-statistics
Kalsnes, B. (2016). The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties’ Facebook Strategy Versus Practice. Social Media Society, 2(2), 1–11.
Kapko, M. (2016, November 3). Twitter’s Impact on 2016 Presidential Election Is Unmistakable. CIO. Retrieved April 8, 2019, from http://www.cio.com/article/3137513/social-networking/twitters-impact-on-2016-presidential-election-is-unmistakable.html
Katz, E., Blumler, J., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and Gratifications Research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.
Lee, J. C., & Quealy, K. (2016, October 23). The 282 People, Places and Things Donald Trump Has Insulted on Twitter: A Complete List. The New York Times. Retrieved July 12, 2019, from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html?campaign_id=A100&campaign_type=Email&_r=1
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2010). I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
McGeough, P. (2016, July 15). Donald Trump Cuts Out Middlemen to Become the Uber of Right Wing Politics. Sunday Morning Herald. Retrieved June 20, 2019, from https://www.smh.com.au/world/donald-trump-cuts-out-middlemen-to-become-the-uber-of-rightwing-politics-20160715-gq6ekc.html
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. (2014). Political Polarization & Media Habits. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/
Moody, C. (2016). How a Golf Caddie Became Trump’s Campaign Confidant. CNN News. Retrieved August 11, 2019, from https://edition.cnn.com/2016/04/29/politics/donald-trump-tweets-daniel-scavino/
Mourão, R., Thorson, E., Chen, W., & Tham, S. M. (2018). Media Repertoires and News Trust During the Early Trump Administration. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1945–1956.
Murray, L. E. (2017, March 15). Deterrence Bounce’ and the Dangers of Shock-Jock Diplomacy. Foreign Policy.
Newport, F. (2018). Deconstructing Trump’s Use of Twitter. Gallup. Retrieved July 3, 2019, from https://news.gallup.com/poll/234509/deconstructing-trump-twitter.aspx
Ott, B., & Dickinson, G. (2019). The Twitter Presidency: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of White Rage. London: Routledge.
Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter Motivate Involvement in Politics? Tweeting, Opinion Leadership, and Political Engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1641–1648.
Peters, G. (2018). Presidential News Conferences. In J. T. Woolley & G. Peters (Eds.), The American Presidency Project. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California. Retrieved May 8, 2019, from https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/323900
Robinson, D. (2018). Text Analysis of Trump’s Tweets Confirms He Writes Only the (Angrier) Android Half. Retrieved February 21, 2019, from http://varianceexplained.org/r/trump-tweets/
Shaban, H. (2019, February 7). Twitter reveals its daily active user numbers for the first time. The Washington Post. Retrieved September 19, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/02/07/twitter-reveals-its-daily-active-user-numbers-first-time/
Smith, D. (2017, March 7). “Building a New Future Framework,” Video Interview with Pippa Malmgren. Real Vision Television. Retrieved July 29, 2019, from https://www.realvision.com/tv/shows/interviews/videos/building-a-new-future-framework
Sonnad, N. (2017). Linguists Reveal the Evolution of Donald Trump’s Tweets Over Time. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from https://qz.com/1153080/trump-tweets-analyzed-by-linguists-reveal-five-characteristics/
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–247.
Swift, A. (2016, September 14). Americans’ Trust in Mass Media Sinks to New Low. Gallup. Retrieved January 18, 2019, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx
Swisher, K. (2018, December 24). All Text and No Subtext. The New York Times. Retrieved February 9, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/24/opinion/trump-twitter-wall-shutdown.html
Tait, A. (2016, August 4). The Strange Case of Marina Joyce and Internet Hysteria. The Guardian. Retrieved February 1, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/04/marina-joyce-internet-hysteria-witch-hunts-cyberspace?CMP=oth_b-aplnews_d-1
Tech Reviews. (2019, January 19). Trump’s Tweet-Meter: The Most Revealing Statistics on the President’s Twitter Account. Retrieved May 2, 2019, from https://www.computertechreviews.com/trump-twitter/
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., & Paltoglou, G. (2011). Sentiment in Twitter Events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 406–418.
Trump Twitter Archive. (2019). Trump Twitter Archive. Retrieved June 9, 2019, from http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment. Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 10, 178–185.
Vlatković, S. (2018). New Communication Forms and Political Framing: Twitter in Donald Trump’s Presidential Campaign. AM Journal of Art And Media Studies, (16), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.259
Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018). Is Trump Always Rambling Like a Fourth-Grade Student? An Analysis of Stylistic Features of Donald Trump’s Political Discourse During the 2016 Election. Discourse and Society, 29(3), 1–17.
Williams, J. C. (2016). What So Many People Don’t Get About the U.S. Working Class. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved June 27, 2019, from https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-so-many-people-dont-get-about-the-u-s-working-class
Woods, O. (2016). How Donald Trump Won an Election with Digital Marketing. Retrieved August 15, 2019, from https://www.mumbrella.asia/2016/11/donald-trump-won-election-digital-marketing
Yourish, K., & Lee, J. (2019, January 28). The Demise of the White House Press Briefing Under Trump. The New York Times. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/22/us/politics/white-house-press-briefing.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morini, M. (2020). Disintermediator-in-Chief. In: Lessons from Trump’s Political Communication. Political Campaigning and Communication. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39010-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39010-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39009-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39010-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)