Skip to main content

Use of Assessments to Inform Educational Policies in French-Speaking Belgium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monitoring Student Achievement in the 21st Century

Abstract

In French-speaking Belgium, the national assessments developed only lately, and there are not yet national assessments developed by professionals that can be used to evaluate trends. Therefore, the only tools available to rigorously evaluate trends are international assessments. French-speaking Belgium has participated in international assessments since the early 1970s and their results are highly valued by policy-makers. Their level of awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of the education system can be considered as good. However, until recently, the impact of international assessments on education policies has been limited. Only scattered initiatives have been taken. From 2014, an extremely ambitious plan called Pacte pour un enseignement d’excellence has been launched. The Pact tackles most of the systemic weaknesses of the education system in FS Belgium and addresses at the same time structural change (lowering grade repetition, moving to a comprehensive lower secondary education), curricular changes and governance in a long-term perspective. A significant reform of the system of national assessments is currently under discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baye, A., Fagnant, A., Hindryckx, G., Lafontaine, D., Matoul, A., & Quittre, V. (2009). Les compétences des jeunes de 15 ans en Communauté française en sciences, en mathématiques et en lecture. Résultats de l’enquête PISA 2006. Cahiers des Sciences de l’Éducation, 29–30, 1–245. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/19520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeuse, M., & Monseur, C. (1999). Analyse critique des indicateurs déterminant l’attribution des moyens destinés à la politique de discrimination positive en Communauté française de Belgique. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 22(2–3), 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demonty, I., Blondin, C., Matoul, A., Baye, A., & Lafontaine, D. (2013). La culture mathématique à 15 ans. Premiers résultats de PISA 2012. Cahiers des Sciences de l’Éducation, 34, 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.aspe.ulg.ac.be/Files/premiers_resultats_pisa_2012__cahiers_34_.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupriez, V., & Maroy, C. (2003). Regulation in school systems: A theoretical analysis of the structural framework of the school system in French-speaking Belgium. Journal of Education Policy, 18(4), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles. (2016). Les indicateurs de l’enseignement. Bruxelles: Service général du pilotage du système éducatif. Edition 2016. Retrieved from http://www.enseignement.be/index.php?page=0&navi=2264B13

  • Friant, N., Demeuse, M., Aubert, A., & Nicaise, I. (2008). Les politiques d’éducation prioritaire en Belgique: deux modes de régulation des effets d’une logique de marché. In M. Demeuse, D. Frandji, D. Greger, & J.-Y. Rochex (Eds.), Les politiques d’éducation prioritaire en Europe. Conceptions, mises en œuvre, débats (pp. 85–133). Institut national de recherches pédagogiques: Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, D. (1996). Performances en lecture et contexte éducatif. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, D. (2014). A petits pas dans la bonne direction. Traces de changements, 215, 4–5. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/173350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, D., & Blondin, C. (2004). Regards sur les acquis des élèves en Communauté française Apports des enquêtes de l’I.E.A, de PISA et des évaluations externes. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, D., Baye, A., Burton, R., Demonty, I., Matoul, A., & Monseur, C. (2003). Les compétences des jeunes de 15 ans en Communauté française en lecture, en mathématiques et en sciences. Cahiers du Service de Pédagogie expérimentale, 13–14, 1–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, D., Dupont, V., & Schillings, P. (2017). Pratiques d’enseignement et compétences en lecture des élèves: qu’évaluent les enquêtes internationales et que peuvent en apprendre les enseignants? In M. Bianco & L. Lima (Eds.), Comment enseigner la compréhension de lecture (pp. 63–81). Paris: Hatier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, D., Dupont, V., & Schillings, P. (2018). Teaching and assessing reading literacy in primary education: Identifying patterns of differences between English, German and French-speaking education systems (PIRLS 2016) (IEA Compass: Briefs in Education, 4). Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, D., Bricteux, S., Hindryckx, G., Matoul, A., & Quittre, V. (2019). Performances des jeunes de 15 ans en lecture, mathématiques et sciences. Premiers résultats de PISA 2018 en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles. Université de Liège: Analyse des systèmes et des pratiques d’enseignement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mons, N. (2007). Les nouvelles politiques éducatives. Paris: PUF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monseur, C. (1997). L’enseignement des sciences est-il dans le 36edessous? Unpublished document. Université de Liège, Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monseur, C., & Lafontaine, D. (2009). L’organisation des systèmes éducatifs: quel impact sur l’efficacité et l’équité? In V. Dupriez & X. Dumay (Eds.), L’efficacité en éducation, promesses et zones d’ombre (pp. 185–219). Bruxelles: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monseur, C., & Lafontaine, D. (2012). Structure des systèmes éducatifs et équité: un éclairage international. In M. Crahay (Ed.), Pour une école juste et efficace (pp. 145–173). Bruxelles, Belgique: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results. Overcoming social background. Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results. Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quittre, V., Crépin, F., & Lafontaine, D. (2018). Les compétences des jeunes en sciences, en mathématiques et en lecture. Résultats de PISA 2015 en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles. Cahiers des Sciences de l’éducation, 37, 1–188. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2268/218401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Lafontaine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lafontaine, D. (2020). Use of Assessments to Inform Educational Policies in French-Speaking Belgium. In: Harju-Luukkainen, H., McElvany, N., Stang, J. (eds) Monitoring Student Achievement in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38968-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38969-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics