Skip to main content

Capabilities, Human Security and the Centrality of Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability, Capabilities and Human Security

Abstract

This chapter provides the background for the book tracing the history of the capabilities approach in Sen and Nussbaum’s work. It provides an introductory overall framework both to the capability and human security approaches. It argues that both Sen and Nussbaum should take on the topic of sustainability as it entails fundamental shifts in the way we understand the capability approach, not least in relation to future generations. The chapter also outlines the book as a whole.

I would like to thank Des Gasper for his insightful and thoughtful comments and suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is to be lamented that the rights of non-human animals, which Nussbaum has written extensively about (e.g. Nussbaum 2006) are not included in this book.

  2. 2.

    A further problem arises in that originally Sen used the singular “capability” rather than the plural “capabilities”, whereas Nussbaum speaks of her “capabilities approach”. The singular version referred also to “a capability set” which is a set of potential functionings. The plural and singular forms now tend to be used without much differentiation between the two (see Robeyns (2005) or Gasper (2002, section 4) for further discussion).

References

  • Alkire, S. (2005). Valuing Freedoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). Human Development and Economic Sustainability. World Development, 28(12), 2029–2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Ferrannini, A. (2014). Sustainable Human Development: A New Territorial and People-Centred Perspective. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boni, A., & Walker, M. (Eds.). (2012). Human Development and Capabilities: Re-imagining the University of the XXI Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2005). The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances e Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances, 1–18. Retrieved from http://economics.ouls.ox.ac.uk/14051/1/gprg-wps-032.pdf.

  • Comim, F., & Nussbaum, M. (Eds.). (2014). Capabilities, Gender, Equality: Toward Fundamental Entitlements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A. (2013). Sustainable Development: Does the Capability Approach Have Anything to Offer? Outlining a Legitimate Freedom Approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A. (2018). Sustainability and Climate Change: Human Development and Human Responsibilities. In Routledge Handbook of Development Ethics (pp. 209–225). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, D. A. (2008). Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S. (2008). Beyond Individual Freedom and Agency: Structures of Living Together in Sen’s Capability Approach to Development. In S. Alkire, F. Comim, & M. Qizilbash (Eds.), The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Application (pp. 105–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S. (2009). Advancing Human Development: Values, Groups, Power and Conflict. Wellbeing in Developing Countries (WeD) Working Papers; No. WeD Working Paper 09/49. Bath: University of Bath/Wellbeing in Developing Countries Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S. (2014). Wellbeing, Justice and Development Ethics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and Its Contradictions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2002). Is Sen’s Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development? Review of Political Economy, 14(4), 435–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, O.A., Gasper, D., & Mine, Y. (2013). Good Practices in Addressing Human Security Through National Human Development Reports. Report for UNDP Human Development Report Office and UN Trust Fund for Human Security. HDRO Occasional Paper. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/good_practices.pdf.

  • Holland, B. (2008). Ecology and the Limits of Justice: Establishing Capability Ceilings in Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach. Journal of Human Development, 9(3), 401–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, B. (2014). Allocating the Earth: A Distributional Framework for Protecting Capabilities in Environmental Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khader, S., & Kosko, S. (2018). ‘Reason to Value,’ Perfectionism, and the Process Aspect of Freedom. In L. Keleher & S. Kosko (Eds.), Agency, Democracy, and Participation in Global Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice. Cumberland, RI: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating Capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2019). Preface: Amartya Sen and the HDCA. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(2), 124–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (2003). Poverty, Well-Being, and Gender: What Counts, Who’s Heard? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(3), 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., ... & Dubash, N. K. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2016). Having Too Much. In NOMOS LVI: Wealth. Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E. F., …, & Nykvist, B. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well-Being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1994). Sustainable Human Development: Concepts and Priorities. United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A/RES/217(III). New York and Paris: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1994). Human Development Report 1994. Retrieved May 27, 2019, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/255/hdr_1994_en_complete_nostats.pdf.

  • United Nations. (2012). General Assembly Resolution on Human Security. A/RES/66/290. Retrieved from www.un.org/humansecurity/content/un-secretary-general-reports-human-security

  • Walker, M. (2006). Higher Education Pedagogies. A Capabilities Approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watene, K. (2013). Nussbaum’s Capability Approach and Future Generations. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Crabtree .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crabtree, A. (2020). Capabilities, Human Security and the Centrality of Sustainability. In: Crabtree, A. (eds) Sustainability, Capabilities and Human Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38905-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics