Skip to main content

Using the State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reinventing Liberalism

Abstract

Innset brings our attention to Hayek’s introductory remarks and the first session of the first Mont Pelerin Society conference. At stake was nothing less than the neoliberal aim of moving beyond laissez-faire , related to the second aspect of the dual argument . Hayek’s critique of laissez-faire was scathing, and he made it clear that liberalism would have to be reinvented in order for a modern society based on market mechanisms to be possible. Walter Eucken and Aaron Director held introductions in which they agreed with Hayek’s main point, but the following discussion concerning the details of state action in the name of market mechanisms derailed, primarily due to the laissez-faireist interventions of Ludwig von Mises .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hayek’s address is another one whose manuscript has been saved for posterity. Again there is a disclaimer at the top saying “It is specially requested not to quote from this document except with the express permission of the person concerned.” Again, I have taken the liberty of the historian to make some quotations, as I read the disclaimer to relate to more short-term use of the manuscript. Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Mont Pelerin Society, Box 5, Folder 12: “Minutes”.

  2. 2.

    The application is then considered by a Membership Committee, which makes a recommendation to a Board of Directors. https://www.montpelerin.org/montpelerin/join.html.

  3. 3.

    Interview with Dorothy Hahn, Cambridge, 21.12.2015.

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    More extensive attempts at studying history through foodstuffs include (Spary 2012) And Steven Shapin’s musings on “the epistemology of the pineapple” in (Shapin 2011).

  6. 6.

    Liberaal Archief, “Mont Pelerin Society”, Box 1, Folder 1 “Mont Pèlerin, 1947”.

  7. 7.

    The version of Hayek’s manuscript kept at The Liberal Archive in Gent is different from the one kept at the Hoover Institution Library and Archives. In the former, there are long sections entitled “ASSOCIATIONS”, “MONETARY STABILIZATION” and “EQUALITY” before the speech closes off. This version is also gathered from somewhere at the Hoover Institution, albeit not in the box related to the archives of the Mont Pelerin Society, which contains the shortened version. It seems reasonable to assume that the shortened version was the one Hayek presented at the conference and thus I have limited my treatment to that. Liberaal Archief, Mont Pelerin Society, Box 1, Folder 1: “Mont Pèlerin, 1947”.

  8. 8.

    There is no manuscript available for Director’s intervention and it was not recorded exactly verbatim by Mrs. Hahn. I have therefore chosen to paraphrase the various interventions, instead of writing them as quotations in quotation marks, even though parts of the minutes appear as full sentences. Liberaal Archief, Mont Pelerin Society, Box 1, Folder 1: “Mont Pèlerin, 1947”.

  9. 9.

    There seems to have been two separate parts to the discussion—one immediately following Hayek’s introduction, and one evening session. The collection of minutes at the Hoover Archives holds the minutes of one of these and the collection at The Liberal Archive in Gent has the other. The latter have the time signature 4.30, whereas the former has the time signature 8.30, so I will therefore assume that this is the order in which the discussion took place, although the fragmentary nature of the minutes leave something to be desired for those seeking to establish absolute clarity.

Secondary Literature

  • Ban, C. (2016). Ruling ideas—How global neoliberalism goes local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos—Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge Massachusetts: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, A. (2012). The great persuasion: Reinventing free markets since the depression. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek’s challenge: Intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. Y. (2009). The introduction of tropical flavours into British cuisine, 1850-1950. AP European History Class: In Research Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, E. (2016). The Viennese students of civilization—The meaning and context of Austrian economics reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (2015). How Friedrich Hayek became fascinated with the romance of Harriet Taylor and J S Mill. New Statesman, May 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1972). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1998). Law, legislation and liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (2007). The road to Serfdom—The Definitive Edition. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. S. (2012). Masters of the universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the birth of neoliberal politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1965). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Hinsdale: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolev, S. (2010). F.A. Hayek as an ordo-liberal. HWWI Research Paper 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, R. (2013). Hayek: A collaborative biography—Part I: Influences, from Mises to Bartley. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, P. (2011). The centrality of the state in neoliberal times: Gramsci and beyond. International Gramsci Journal: 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell Jr., & Llewellyn, H. (1998). Mises and liberty. In Auburn, Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, D. T. (1998). Atlantic crossings: Social politics in a progressive age. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (2011). Changing tastes: How foods tasted in the Early modern period and how they taste now. In Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan Wilson, D. (2015). The road to ideology. How Friedrich Hayek became a monster. Evonomics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spary, E. C. (2012). Eating the enlightenment: Food and the sciences in Paris, 1670–1760. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, R. (2009). Reinventing monopoly and the role of corporations: The roots of Chicago law and economics. In The Road from Mont Pelerin (pp. 204–238). Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, R. (2014). Henry Simons’ death. History of political economy, 46, 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ola Innset .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Innset, O. (2020). Using the State. In: Reinventing Liberalism. Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38885-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics