Abstract
There only seem to be a limited amount of studies regarding teachers’ participation in professional development (PD). However, there is a rather wide range of studies dedicated to this research area. This research is characterized by different methodology approaches, target groups, and a focus of certain PD programs and therefore quantitative synthesizing approaches (e.g., meta-analysis) are not applicable. Nevertheless, this body of research provides relevant results for this area of research. Against this background, the first chapter introduces the relevance of conducting a systematic literature review on teachers’ participation in PD and potential aspects that may influence their attendance. To do so, the chapter presents why (formal) PD is important and emphasizes the relevance of the first step in the PD process: The choice of participating in a (certain) PD workshop. The chapter also outlines the inconsistent and hard to compare state of research. Furthermore, it presents the three main research questions that motivated the literature review and describes the conditions for teacher PD within the three focused countries. Finally, a short preview of the book structure is outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See Richter (2016) for a first approach to summarizing studies from Germany with regard to teachers’ participation as well as reasons for and against attending PD. However, the results are based only on eight publications.
References
Balmer, T. (2017). Wirksamkeit von Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerweiterbildung: Effekte von Lehrmittelkursen auf Kognitionen und die Unterrichtsgestaltung von Lehrpersonen sowie die Unterrichtswahrnehmung der Schülerinnen und Schüler. University of Zurich, Zurich. Retrieved from https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/157257/1/157257.pdf https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-157257.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157.
Beier, M. E., & Kanfer, R. (2010). Motivation in training and development: A phase perspective. In S. W. J Kozlowski & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 65–98). New York: Routledge.
Boyle, B., Lamprianou, I., & Boyle, T. (2005). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450500114819.
Commission of the European Communities. (2000). A memorandum on lifelong learning. Brussels.
Daschner, P. (2009). Lehrerfort- und weiterbildung: Professionalisierung im Kontext der Lehrerbildung. In S. Blömeke, T. Bohl, L. Haag, G. Lang-Wojtasik, & W. Sacher (Eds.), Handbuch Schule: Theorie—Organisation—Entwicklung (pp. 490–494). Julius Klinkhardt.
Daschner, P., & Hanisch, R. (Eds.). (2019). Lehrkräftefortbildung in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und Orientierung. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Diehl, T., Krüger, J., Richter, A., & Vigerske, S. (2010). Einflussfaktoren auf die Fort- und Weiterbildung von Lehrkräften—Erste Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojekts [Factors influencing the teachers’ professional development—First results of a research project]. bwp@ (19), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.bwpat.de/ausgabe19/diehl_etal_bwpat19.pdf.
Eurydice. (2003). The teaching profession in Europe: Profile, trends and concerns. Report III: Working conditions and pay. Key topics in education in Europe: Vol. 3. Brussels: Eurydice.
Feller, W., & Stürgkh, A. (2017). Was Österreichs Lehrer lernen: Warum Fortbildung mindestens so wichtig ist wie die Erstausbildung. Wien: Agenda Austria. Retrieved from https://www.agenda-austria.at/publikationen/was-oesterreichs-lehrer-lernen/lehrerfortbildung-in-oesterreich/.
Gorozidis, G., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2014). Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.001.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hildebrandt, S. A., & Eom, M. (2011). Teacher professionalization: Motivational factors and the influence of age. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.011.
Kotthof, H.-G., & Terhart, E. (2013). ‘New’ solutions to ‘old’ problems? Recent reforms in teacher education in Germany. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 22, 73–92.
Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4.
Lipowsky, F. (2010). Lernen im Beruf: Empirische Befunde zur Wirksamkeit von Lehrerfortbildung [Learning in the profession: Empirical findings on the effectiveness of teacher professional development]. In F. H. Müller, A. Eichenberger, M. Lüders, & J. Mayr (Eds.), Lehrerinnen und Lehrer lernen: Konzepte und Befunde zur Lehrerfortbildung. Waxmann: Münster.
Lipowsky, F. (2011). Theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Befunde zur Wirksamkeit von Lehrerfort- und -weiterbildung [Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings on the effectiveness of teacher professional development]. In E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz, & M. Rothland (Eds.), Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf (pp. 398–417). Münster: Waxmann.
Lipowsky, F., & Rzejak, D. (2015). Key features of effective professional development programmes for teachers. Ricercazione: Six-monthly Journal on Learning, Research and Innovation in Education, 7(2), 27–51.
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rice, J. K. (2009). Investing in human capital through teacher professional development. In D. D. Goldhaber & J. Hannaway (Eds.), Creating a new teaching profession (pp. 227–247). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Richter, D. (2011). Lernen im Beruf [Learning in the profession]. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV (pp. 317–325). Münster: Waxmann.
Richter, D. (2013). Professional development across the teaching career. In M. Kunter (Ed.), Mathematics teacher education. Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 333–342). New York, London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_17.
Richter, D. (2016). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer lernen: Fort- und Weiterbildung im Lehrerberuf [Teachers learn: Professional development in the teaching profession]. In M. Rothland (Ed.), Beruf Lehrer/Lehrerin (pp. 245–260). Münster: Waxmann.
Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008.
Rzejak, D., Künsting, J., Lipowsky, F., Fischer, E., Dezhgahi, U., & Reichardt, A. (2014). Facetten der Lehrerfortbildungsmotivation—eine faktorenanalytische Betrachtung [Facets of teachers’ motivation for professional development—Results of a factorial analysis]. Journal for Educational Research Online, 6(1), 139–159.
Tharenou, P. (2001). The relationship of training motivation to participation in training and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167541.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: best evidence synthesis. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In M. Kooy & K. Van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.
Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.‑Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/rel_2007033_sum.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krille, C. (2020). Relevance and Scope of the Literature Review. In: Teachers' Participation in Professional Development . SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38844-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38844-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38843-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38844-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)