Abstract
Multi-criteria production theory (MCPT) is a decision-theoretical generalisation of traditional production theories developed in order to integrate concerns of modern management science and economics, such as sustainability and environmental protection. Its main idea is to distinguish between the technologically determined inputs and outputs of a production system’s activity and their desired or undesired impacts on artificial or natural environments. This is formalised by multiple value functions mapping the production possibility set (PPS) onto the value possibility set (VPS). Depending on the concretisation of the relevant objectives different kinds of economic, ecological or social concerns can be captured and analysed in view of the performance of the possible production activities as the decision alternatives at hand. Chapter 2 proves main theorems of MCPT and discusses the fundamentality of some axioms used in traditional production theories. The theorems are concerned with sufficient conditions for certain properties of the VPS, in particular its convexity or linearity. Furthermore, a monotonicity result for a hierarchy of valuations is derived. While an axiom of value disposability is plausible and helps to guarantee the convexity of the VPS, other axioms do not seem to be realistic or better must refer to the costs and benefits instead of the inputs and outputs.
This chapter is a revised version of essential parts from Dyckhoff (2018) by permission of the author. In addition, Sections 2.3.2 and 2.4.1 are adapted from Dyckhoff (2019) by permission of Springer Nature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afsharian M, Ahn H, Neumann L (2016) Generalized DEA – An approach for supporting input/output factor determination in DEA. Benchmarking: An International Journal 23:1892–1909
Agrell PJ, Hatami-Marbini A (2013) Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management: State of the art and research directions. Computers & Industrial Engineering 66:567–583
Avkiran NK, Parker BR (2010) Pushing the DEA research envelope. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 44:1–7
Baumgärtner S, Dyckhoff H, Faber M, Proops J, Schiller J (2001) The concept of joint production and ecological economics. Ecological Economics 36:365–372
Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL (2003) Rational inefficiencies. Journal of Productivity Analysis 20:243–271
Dakpo KH, Jeanneaux P, Latruffe L (2016) Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric framework. European Journal of Operational Research 250:347–359
Dano S (1966) Industrial Production Models. Springer, Wien/New York
Dinkelbach W, Rosenberg O (2004) Erfolgs- und umweltorientierte Produktionstheorie. 5th ed, Springer, Berlin et al.
Dyckhoff H (1992) Betriebliche Produktion: Theoretische Grundlagen einer umweltorientierten Produktionswirtschaft. Springer, Berlin et al.
Dyckhoff H (2003) Neukonzeption der Produktionstheorie. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 73:705–732
Dyckhoff H (2018) Multi-criteria production theory: Foundation of non-financial and sustainability performance evaluation. Journal of Business Economics 88:851–882 (DOI:10.1007/s11573-017-0885-1; open access)
Dyckhoff H (2019) Multi-criteria production theory: Convexity propositions and reasonable axioms. Journal of Business Economics 89:719–735
Dyckhoff H, Ahn H (2001) Sicherstellung der Effektivität und Effizienz der Führung als Kernfunktion des Controlling. Kostenrechnungspraxis 45:111−121
Dyckhoff H, Ahn H (2010) Verallgemeinerte DEA-Modelle zur Performanceanalyse. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 80:1249–1276
Dyckhoff H, Allen K (2001) Measuring ecological efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research 132:312–325
Dyckhoff H, Gehring H (1988) Trim loss and inventory planning in a small textile firm. In: Fandel G, Dyckhoff H, Reese J (ed): Essays on Production Theory and Planning. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 181–190
Dyckhoff H, Spengler T (2010) Produktionswirtschaft. 3rd ed, Springer, Berlin et al.
Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CC, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 132:245–259
Eisenführ F, Weber M, Langer T (2010) Rational Decision Making. Springer, Berlin et al.
Esser J (2001) Entscheidungstheoretische Erweiterung der Produktionstheorie. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a. M.
Fandel G (2009) (ed) Rational Inefficiencies. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 4/2009. Gabler, Wiesbaden
Fandel G (2010) Produktions- und Kostentheorie. 8th ed, Springer, Berlin et al.
Fandel G, Lorth M (2009) On the technical (in)efficiency of a profit maximum. International Journal of Production Economics 121:409–426
Fandel G, Lorth M (2010) Technische Ineffizienz als Ergebnis rationalen Entscheidungsverhaltens. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 80:477–494
Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA. Kluwer, Boston et al.
Frisch R (1965) Theory of Production. D. Reidel Publ., Dordrecht
Gutenberg E (1951) Grundlagen der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Band I: Die Produktion. 24th ed, 1983, Springer, Berlin
Hasenkamp G (1992) Multiple objectives in the theory of the firm. Journal of Productivity Analysis 3:323–335
Koopmans TC (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In:
Koopmans TC (ed) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 33–97
Kuosmanen T, Kortelainen M (2005) Measuring eco-efficiency of production with Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9:59–72
Liu W, Meng W, Li X, Zhang DQ (2010) DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs. Annals of Operations Research 173:177–194
Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon F-M, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque J-F, Lee D, Mendoza B, Nakajima T, Robock A, Stephens G, Takemura T, Zhang H (2013): Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Change Stocker, TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds.): Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp 659–740
Shephard RW (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton NJ
Souren R (1996) Theorie betrieblicher Reduktion. Physica, Heidelberg
Wojcik V, Dyckhoff H, Gutgesell S (2017) The desirable input of undesirable factors in Data Envelopment Analysis. Annals of Operations Research 259:461–484
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dyckhoff, H., Souren, R. (2020). Multi-criteria Production Theory: Foundation of Performance Evaluation. In: Performance Evaluation. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38732-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38732-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38731-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38732-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)