Courtroom Expressions: The Intermingling of the Semiotic and Material Regimes
- 92 Downloads
In this chapter, we begin to explore the courtroom affective assemblage, by focusing specifically, although not exclusively, upon the semiotic regime, as it relates to the offence of rape. By exploring barristers’ perspectives, we gain original insight into how the system works and the factors that enable or inhibit the implementation of sexual offence law reforms and policy. This allows us to explore the processes and interactions between different components within the assemblage, to map their patterns, flows and outcomes and begin to make them visible. Of significance is how the law plays out in practice, how it is implemented through the interactive processes between heterogeneous components and moments of self-organisation and emergence. We note how barristers expressed a preference for smooth over striated space and for provisions/reforms produced by those who have an ‘intensive sense’ of the courtroom.
KeywordsCourtroom assemblage Semiotic regime Sexual Offences Act 2003 Rape policies Myths Intensive sense
- Carline, A., & Gunby, C. (2017). Rape Politics, Policies and Practice: Exploring the Tensions and Unanticipated Consequences of Well-Intended Victim-Focused Measures. The Howard Journal, 56, 34–52.Google Scholar
- Cook, K. (2011). Rape Investigation and Prosecution: Stuck in the Mud? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(3), 250–262.Google Scholar
- Cowan, S. (2007). Freedom and Capacity to Make a Choice: A Feminist Analysis of Consent in the Criminal Law of Rape. In V. Munro & C. Stychin (Eds.), Sexuality and the Law: Feminist Engagements (pp. 51–71). Abingdon: Glasshouse Press Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
- Gunby, C., & Carline, A. (2019). The Emotional Particulars of Working on Rape Cases: Doing Dirty Work, Managing Emotional Dirt and Conceptualizing ‘Tempered Indifference’. British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz054.
- Home Office. (2006). The Sexual Offences Act 2003: A Stocktake. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- Judicial College. (2019). The Crown Court Compendium. Part 1: Trial Management and Summing Up. London: Judicial College.Google Scholar
- Parliament. (2017). Ministry of Justice Expenditure: Written Question – 1125414. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2017-11-13/112641/.
- Zydervelt, S., Zajac, R., Kaladelfos, A., & Westera, N. (2017). Lawyers’ Strategies for Cross-Examining Rape Complainants: Have We Moved Beyond the 1950s? British Journal of Criminology, 57(3), 551–569.Google Scholar