Abstract
In this chapter by Alf Westelius and Johnny Lind, “Painting the relevant organisation”, the authors discuss how it is increasingly less self-evident which entity should be the focus of strategic management control. Although the relevant organisation may be the whole, or some parts, of an organisation, it may also be a somewhat broader entity such as a joint venture, an imaginary (i.e. virtual) organisation, a network (Uppsala School network theory style), a value constellation or a partnership. The chapter discusses all these, less obvious, possibilities. Because different people are likely to have different views on what constitutes the relevant entity, an essential aspect of strategic management control is establishing and maintaining the dialogue on associations and boundaries. The dialogue may involve a strong party, perhaps aiming to inspect and influence external parties (e.g. suppliers and customers), but can also be conducted among more equal partners. The authors conclude that people who want to take an active management role, or who want to include others in the exercise of management control, should learn how to paint a convincing picture of what they view as the relevant entity to control (or the relevant parties that should cooperate in jointly controlling their collaboration).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This unquestioning approach to systemic limitations does not apply exclusively to traditional management control. Other chapters in this book (on the topics of strategy maps, planning, costing and pricing, co-worker control and the controller’s follow-up role) also take this approach.
- 2.
The Uppsala School’s network theory originated in a large European comparative study (set in France, Italy, Sweden, Germany and Great Britain) that examined relationships among purchasers and suppliers in industrial markets (Håkansson 1982). This study revealed that such markets are characterised by the interactions between mutually dependent companies.
- 3.
Following James Moore’s (1993) article on the ecology of competition in the Harvard Business Review, ecology and ecosystems have gained ground in the strategy and management control literature and among practitioners. Whereas Moore and, for example, Iansiti and Levien (2004) are fascinated by situations in which dominant actors sooner or later appear and exert powerful influence, Olve et al. (2013) use business ecology to point to the unpredictable and uncontrollable aspects of cooperation development.
- 4.
The possibility of influencing people’s understanding is also a key aspect of the strategy map discussion in Chap. 2, and the calibration and adjustments of various subjective understandings through dialogue, often related to numbers in reports or targets, is a recurrent theme in other chapters of this book.
- 5.
Around this time, the interest for such boundary-spanning collaboration and dialogues was starting to grow also within management control research. The influential management accounting researcher Anthony Hopwood published a call in 1996 in Accounting, Organizations and Society for research on information exchange and control in organisational networks and in cooperations that cross organisational boundaries (Hopwood 1996).
- 6.
The idea that actors at many levels of the organisation participate in strategic management control is emphasised repeatedly in this book, although most authors do not claim they are supporters of the network school.
- 7.
By agile, we mean manoeuvrable and adaptable.
References
Boland, Richard, and Tenkasi, Ramakrishnan. 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science 6(4), 350–372.
Carlsson-Wall, Martin, Kraus, Kalle, and Lind, Johnny. 2015. Strategic management accounting in close inter-organisational relationships. Accounting and Business Research 45(1), 27–54.
Cäker, Mikael. 2005. Management Accounting as Constructing and Opposing Customer Focus: Three Case Studies on Management Accounting and Customer Relations. Linköping: Linköping university.
Chandler, Alfred D., Jr., and Daems, Herman. 1979. Administrative coordination, allocation and monitoring: A comparative analysis of the emergence of accounting and organization in the U.S.A. and Europe. Accounting, Organizations and Society 4(1–2), 3–20.
Feldman, Martha S., and March, James G. 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(2), 171–186.
Ford, David, and Håkansson, Håkan. 2006. The idea of business interaction. The IMP Journal 1(1), 4–20.
Galbraith, Jay. 1971. Matrix organization designs: How to combine functional and project forms. Business Horizons 14(1), 29–40.
Hedberg, Bo, Dahlgren, Göran, Hansson, Jörgen, and Olve, Nils-Göran. 1994. Imaginära Organisationer. Malmö: Liber-Hermods.
Hedberg, Bo, Dahlgren, Göran, Hansson, Jörgen, and Olve, Nils-Göran. 1997. Virtual Organizations and Beyond: Discover Imaginary Systems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Hopwood, Anthony. 1996. Looking across rather than up and down: On the need to explore the lateral processing of information. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21, 589–590.
Håkansson, Håkan. 1982. International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods. An Interaction Approach. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Håkansson, Håkan, Kraus, Kalle, and Lind, Johnny. 2010. Accounting in Networks. New York: Routledge.
Iansiti, Marco, and Levien, Roy. 2004. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review 82(3), 68–78.
Kajüter, Peter, and Kulmala, Harri. 2005. Open-book accounting in networks: Potential achievements and reasons for failures. Management Accounting Research 16(2), 179–204.
Kotter, John P. 1982. What effective general managers really do. Harvard Business Review 60(6), 156–167.
Lind, Johnny, and Thrane, Sof. 2005. Network accounting. In: Accounting in Scandinavia – The Northern Lights, eds. Jönsson, Sten, and Mouritsen, Jan, 115–137. Malmö: Liber.
Lundmark, Erik, and Westelius, Alf. 2014. Entrepreneurship as elixir and mutagen. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 38(3), 575–600.
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 2013/1513. Il Principe. The Prince. Milton Keynes: JiaHu Books.
Moore, James F. 1993. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71(3), 75–86.
Normann, Richard, and Ramirez, Rafael. 1993. From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review 71(4), 65–77.
Olve, Nils-Göran, Cöster, Mathias, Petri, Carl-Johan, Iveroth, Einar, and Westelius, Alf. 2013. Prissättning: Affärsekologier, Affärsmodeller. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Shank, John K., and Govindarajan, Vijay. 1993. Strategic Cost Management – The New Tool for Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.
Thrane, Sof. 2004. The Social and Economic Dynamics of Networks – A Weberian Analysis of Three Formalised Horizontal Networks. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
Weick, Karl. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Westelius, Alf. 1996. A Study of Patterns of Communication in Management Accounting and Control Projects. Stockholm: EFI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Westelius, A., Lind, J. (2020). Painting the Relevant Organisation. In: Nilsson, F., Petri, CJ., Westelius, A. (eds) Strategic Management Control. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38640-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38640-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38639-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38640-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)