Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice ((PAHSEP,volume 18))

  • 379 Accesses

Abstract

Between now and 2050 the world population will grow by one third from 7.8 to 9.8 million people, which will require 70% more food with the present conditions of consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Text translated from a conference given by the author at the Institute of Economic Research, UNAM in Mexico City during October 2016 and was updated for this volume.

  2. 2.

    Nestlé has proposed in 2001 a new productivist model, which is overcoming the green revolution that has stagnated, due to the high prices of hydrocarbons, the contamination of water, soil and air by agrochemicals and their negative effects on human health and ecosystems. The new paradigm, also called life sciences or precision farming is promoted by transnational enterprises, who control GMO-seeds, agrochemicals, storage, supermarket chains and the finances. These enterprises are generating a productivist-commercial monopoly, in which genetic modified organisms, health and food transformation technologies are integrated in clusters for the production and transformation of food. In the view of this author, only green-organic agriculture or agroecology offers an alternative model, where environmental services are combined with food production and where peasants, women and indigenous people are finding alternatives for their survival in rural areas.

  3. 3.

    Both models of agriculture could coexist and in limited spaces, the industrialised production could produce some export products for getting the necessary foreign devises to pay back the debts and its service.

  4. 4.

    Sachs (2004) proposed a development model for Africa called ‘the big five’, which includes: 1. improvement of food products and nutrition locally produced with agroecology, fruit trees and domestic animals; 2. community health centers to treat common diseases, reproductive health and HIV-AIDS; 3. basic education and technological training; 4. renewable energies from sun and wind; 5. clean water, letrinisation, rainfall harvest, pond to store rainwater, water wells into aquifers and its protection to avoid diseases and vectors.

References

  • Ackerman, Frank, Kevin Gallagher (2008). “The Shrinking Gains from Global Trade Liberalization in Computable General Equilibrium Models”, International Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 37, No. 1, Spring, pp. 50–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Anthony J. (2003). “Virtual water eliminates water wars? A case study from the Middle East”, In A. Y. Hoekstra (Ed.), Virtual water trade Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, Delft, IHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri Miguel A., Víctor Manuel Toledo (2010). La revolución agroecológica de América Latina: Rescatar la naturaleza, asegurar la soberanía alimentaria y empoderar al campesino, Bogota, El Otro Derecho/ILSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez Enrique, Úrsula Oswald Spring (1993). Desnutrición Crónica o Aguda Materno Infantil y Retardos en el Desarrollo, Aporte de Investigación No. 59, Cuernavaca, CRIM-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avelar González, Francisco Javier, Elsa Marcela Ramírez López, Ma. Consolación Martínez Saldaña, Alma Lilián Guerrero Barrera, Fernando Jaramillo Juárez (2011). “Water quality in the State of Aguascalientes and its effects in the population’s health, in Úrsula Oswald Spring (Ed.) Water Research in Mexico. Scarcity, Degradation, Stress, Conflicts, Management, and Policy, Berlin, Springer, pp. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, H.G. et al. (Eds.) (2009). Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts, Berlin, Springer, pp. 965–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, Hans Günter, Úrsula Oswald Sring, John Grin, Jürgen Scheffran (2016). Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace, Cham, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, J.S. (1827). The Sphinx, London, Journal of Politics, Literature, and News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord, Louise, Maria Eugenia Genoni, Carlos Rodríguez-Castelán (2015). Prosperidad compartida y fin de la pobreza en América Latina y el Caribe, Washington, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortés Muñoz, Juana Enriqueta, César Guillermo Calderón Mólgora (2011). “Potable water use from aquifers connected to irrigation of residual water”, in Úrsula Oswald Spring (Ed.) Water Research in Mexico. Scarcity, Degradation, Stress, Conflicts, Management, and Policy, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, William J., Frank R. Rijsberman (2002). World Water Vision (WWV), London, Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durán-Medina, Elvira, Jean-François Mas, Alejandro Velásquez (2007). “Cambios en las coberturas de vegetación y usos del suelo en regiones con manejo forestal comunitario y Áreas Naturales Protegidas de México”, In Bray/Merino/Barry (Eds.), Los bosques comunitarios de México, Mexico, SEMARNAT-INE, pp. 267–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1996). “Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action”, World Food Summit 13–17 November, Rome, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations] (2008). El Estado de la Inseguridad Alimentaria en el Mundo, Rome, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN] (2013a). Climate smart agriculture. Sourcebook, http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3325e.pdf.

  • FAO (2013b). Food wastage footprint. Impacts on natural resources, Rome, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015a). Global guidelines for the restoration of degraded forests and landscapes in drylands: building resilience and benefiting livelihoods, Forestry Paper No. 175, Rome, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015b). Pérdidas y desperdicios de alimentos en América Latina y el Caribe, Los países de la región avanzan hacia un futuro con menos pérdidas y desperdicios de alimentos, Rome, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2016). Status of World’s Soil Resources, Rome, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2017). Livestock solutions for climate change, Rome, FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018. Building climate resilience for food security and nutrition, Rome, FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, Eduardo (1980). La venas abiertas de América Latina, Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • GHI (2014). Global Hunger Index. The Challenge of Hidden Hunger, http://cdm15738.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/128360/filename/128571.pdf.

  • IPBES (2018). Summary for Policymakers of the Regional Assessment Reports on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Africa, for the Americas, for Europe and Central Asia, for Asia and Pacific, Bonn, IPBES.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014). Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Geneva, WMO/IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, Sang-Hee, Daejin Kang, Myung-Woon Lim, Chang Soo Kang, Ha Jung Sung (2010). “Risk Assessment of Growth Hormones and Antimicrobial Residues in Meat”, Toxical Res. Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, Tim, Michael Heaseman (2004). Food Wars. The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets, London, Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughton, Rebecca (2017) A Matter of Scale: A study of the productivity, financial viability and multifunctional benefits of small farms (20 ha and less). Landworkers’ Alliance and Centre for Agroecology, Coventry University.

    Google Scholar 

  • LVC [La Via Campesina] (2005). “Agreement on Gender in Via Campesina”, Sao Paolo, LVC.

    Google Scholar 

  • LVC (2010). La Via Campesina: La agricultura campesina sostenible puede alimentar al mundo. Via Campesina Views, No. 6, https://viacampesina.org/es/.

  • LVC (2011). La Via Campesina: Primer Encuentro de Formadores@s en Agroecología en la Región 1 de África de la Vía Campesina, 12–20 de Junio de 2011, Declaración de Shashe, https://viacampesina.org/es/.

  • LVC, ETC, Grain (2016). Visión corporativa del futuro de la alimentación promovida en la ONU. Más de 100 organizaciones de la sociedad civil alertan sobre la reunión de biotecnología de la FAO, http://www.etcgroup.org/es/content/vision-corporativa-del-futuro-de-la-alimentacion-promovida-en-la-onu-mas-de-100.

  • Machin-Sosa, B., A.M. Roque-Jaime, D.R. Avila-Lozano and P. Rosset (2010). Revolución Agroecológica: el Movimiento de Campesino a Campesino de la ANAP en Cuba, Habana, ANAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, Claude (1999). Mujeres, graneros y capitales, México, D.F., Sigo XXI Eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula (2007). Políticas Alimentarias”, in José Luís Calva (Ed.) Derechos y Políticas Sociales, Mexico, Ed. Cámara Diputados, Miguel Ángel Porrúa-UNAM, pp. 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald-Spring, Úrsula (2008). “Food and nutrition”, en: Leonard (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Developing World, Vol. 2: 663–666 y “Causes of Food Insecurity in Developing Countries”, pp. 664–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald-Spring, Úrsula (2009). “Food as a New Human and Livelihood Security Challenge”, en: Brauch et al. (Eds.). Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts, Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 471–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald Spring, Úrsula (2011). “Genetically Modified Organisms: A Threat for Food Security and Risk for Food Sovereignty and Survival”, in Brauch, Hans Günter et al. (eds.) Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 1019–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald-Spring, Úrsula, S. Eréndira Serrano-Oswald, Adriana Estrada-Álvarez et al. (2014). Vulnerabilidad Social y Género entre Migrantes Ambientales, Cuernavaca, CRIM-DGAPA-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald-Spring, Úrsula, S. Eréndira Serrano-Oswald (2019) (Eds.). Risks, Violence, Security and Peace in Latin America, Cham, Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, Jeffrey Taylor (2008). Unauthorized Immigrants and their U.S.-Born Children, Washington, D.C., Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangel Medina, Miguel, Rogelio Monreal Saveedra, Christopher Watts (2011). “Coastal Aquifers of Sonora: Hydrogeological Analysis Maintaining a Sustainable Equilibrium”, in Úrsula Oswald Spring (Ed.), Water Resources in Mexico. Scarcity, Degradation, Stress, Conflicts, Management, and Policy, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • REN21 (2015). Renewables 2015. Global Status Report, Paris, REN21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P. M. 2011. “Food sovereignty and alternative paradigms to confront land grabbing and the food and climate crises”, Development, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Jeffrey (2004). The end of poverty: How we can make it happen in our lifetime, London, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDG (2015). Sustainable Development Goals, New York, UNGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, Felipe, Yolanda Trápaga, José Gasca, Sergio Martínez (2012). Abasto de alimentos en economía abierta. Situación en México, Mexico, IIEC-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermuelen SJ, PK Aggarwal, A Ainslie, C Angelone, BM Campbell, AJ Challinor, J Hansen, JSI Ingram, A Jarvis, P Kristjanson, C Lau, K Thornton, E Wollenberg (2014). Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change: Outlook for Knowledge, Tools and Action, CCAFS Report no. 3, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • WB (2011). Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Call to Action, World Bank, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO [World Health Organization] (2002). Understanding the BSE threat, WHO/CDS/ CSR/EPH/ 2002.6, Geneva, WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2009). Worldwide prevalence of anemia 1993–2005, Geneva, World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO, UNEP (2015). Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health: a state of knowledge review, Geneva, World Health Organization, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Brian D. (2014) Global Biofuels: Key to the Puzzle of Grain Market Behavior”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Úrsula Oswald Spring .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oswald Spring, Ú. (2020). Agroecology for Food Sovereignty and Security. In: Earth at Risk in the 21st Century: Rethinking Peace, Environment, Gender, and Human, Water, Health, Food, Energy Security, and Migration . Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38569-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38569-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38568-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38569-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics