Skip to main content

Mapping the Geography of Italian Knowledge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 409 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1009))

Abstract

Nowadays, economic geography and cognitive fields are has besetted with knowledge input and output measurement instead of assessing the quality of the knowledge produced. In this paper, we measure the complexity of knowledge, and map the distribution and the evolution of knowledge in the Italian regions through a neural network approach, based on non-linear clustering with the use of the Self-Organizing Map, and exploring in which way spatial knowledge could be linked to complexity via a relatedness measurement, the Knowledge Complexity Index. Our measurement is based on the analysis of patent data from the European Patent Office, focusing on the Italian context, between 2004 and 2012. We find that knowledge complexity is not homogeneously distributed across Italy. The implementation of this new research line could be helpful in terms of Italian regional diversification because its implementation is still at an early stage at both nation and regional levels and, at the same time, the reduction in the divergence between Regional Innovation Systems in Northern and Southern of Italy will continue to represent the major policy challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The emergent phenomena could be identified as aggregate economic patterns such as economic growth and inflation, because they derive from the interactions of heterogeneous agents with heterogeneous expectation (e.g. [10]) and bounded rationality (e.g. [18]). As a consequence of these characteristics, this type of economic agent is limited because, according to Simon [15, 16] (i) only limited, frequently unreliable information is available with regard to possible alternatives and their uncertain consequences, (ii) the human mind has a limited capacity to articulate and process the information available; and (iii) only a limited amount of time is available to make one or more decisions.

  2. 2.

    This dilemma affirms that the search for technological rent pushes regions to develop more complex knowledge. However, at the same time, complex technologies remain unattainable.

  3. 3.

    There is a new literature field which considers the patent data system as an obstacle for the innovation economy. According to Mazzucato [11], this obstacle is present in four principal areas: (i) what a patent is, (ii) the patent protection length, (iii) the ease with which patents can be obtained; and (iv) the reasons for seeking patent protection.

  4. 4.

    This index is based on the methods of reflection, developed by Hidalgo et al. [7]. Following their method, we have analyzed the design of the Italian region-tech knowledge network, showing that a region could have a complex technological composition if it generates knowledge that relatively few other regions can imitate.

  5. 5.

    The graph has been build and visualized using the yEd software.

References

  1. Asheim, B., Gertler, M.: The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Faberberg, D., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 291–317. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balland, P.A., Rigby, D.L.: The geography of complex knowledge. Econ. Geogr. 93(1), 1–23 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balland, P.A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., Rigby, D.L.: Smart specialization policy in the EU: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Pap. Evol. Econ. Geogr. 17, 1–32 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bult, K.: R & D, patenting and innovative activities: a statistical exploration. Res. Policy 11, 33–51 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dicken, P.: Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. Sage, Noubury Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grabher, G.: The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher, G. (ed.) The Embedded Firms: on the Socio-Economies of Industrial Networks, pp. 255–277. Routledge, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hidalgo, C., Haussman, R.: The building blocks of economic complexity. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 106, pp. 10576–10575 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaffe, A.B.: Technological opportunity and spillovers of R & D: evidence from firm’s patents, profits and market value. Working Paper 185, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, S., Anand, J.: Knowledge complexity and the performance of inter-unit knowledge replication structures. Strat. Manag. J. 39(7), 1959–1989 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirman, A.: Ants and non-optimal self-organization: lessons from macroeconomics. Macroecon. Dyn. 20(2), 601–621 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazzucato, M.: The Value of Everything. Making and Talking in the Global Economy. Allen Lane, an Imprint of Penguin Books - Random House, UK (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neffke, F.: Productive places: the influence of technological change and relatedness on agglomeration externalities. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rigby, D.: Technological relatedness and knowledge space: entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Reg. Stud. 49, 1922–1937 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saxenian, A.: Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route, vol. 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York (1945/1957)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69(1), 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon, H.: The architecture of complexity. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 106, 467–482 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simon, H.: Theories of bounded rationality. Decis. Organ. 1(1), 161–176 (1972)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Teece, D., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., Winter, S.: Understanding corporate coherence: theory and evidence. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 23, 1–30 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Cialfi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cialfi, D., Colantonio, E. (2020). Mapping the Geography of Italian Knowledge. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, SH., Corchado, J. (eds) Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity. DECON 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1009. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38227-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics