Skip to main content

Games with Multiple Alternatives Applied to Voting Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity (DECON 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1009))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe voting mechanisms to study voting systems as well as electoral systems and parliamentary organizations. These mechanisms are base on the so-called power indices of simple games with alternatives. The classical power indices applied to simple games just consider two options, yes/agree or not/reject. Here we also consider the abstention option, whose condition is allowed in most voting rules. In fact, we consider the extended Shapley–Shubik and Banzhaf indices to measure the power of the player/voter or the coalition in real voting systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bachrach, Y., Markakis, E., Resnick, E., Procaccia, A.D., Rosenschein, J.S., Saberi, A.: Approximating power indices: theoretical and empirical analysis. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 20(2), 105–122 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banzhaf III, J.F.: Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers L. Rev. 19, 317 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolger, E.M.: The banzhaf index for multicandidate presidential elections. SIAM J. Algebr. Discrete Methods 4(4), 442–458 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolger, E.M.: A value for games withn players andr alternatives. Int. J. Game Theory 22(4), 319–334 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Carreras, F.: \(\alpha \)-decisiveness in simple games, pp. 77–91. Springer, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carreras, F., Magaña, A.: The shapley-shubik index for simple games with multiple alternatives. Ann. Oper. Res. 158(1), 81–97 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman, J.S.: Control of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to act. In: Social Choice, pp. 269–300 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: A heuristic approximation method for the banzhaf index for voting games. Multiagent Grid Syst. 8(3), 257–274 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freixas, J.: Power indices. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freixas, J., Molinero, X.: Simple games and weighted games: a theoretical and computational viewpoint. Discrete Appl. Math. 157(7), 1496–1508 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Freixas, J., Zwicker, W.S.: Anonymous yes-no voting with abstention and multiple levels of approval. Games Econ. Behav. 67(2), 428–444 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodge, J.K., Klima, R.E.: The Mathematics of Voting and Elections: A Hands-on Approach, vol. 30. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2018)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Machover, M., Dan, S.F.: The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Myerson, R.B.: Values of games in partition function form. Int. J. Game Theory 6(1), 23–31 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Nieto, A.M.: Formación de coaliciones en los juegos cooperativos y juegos con múltiples alternativas. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Owen, G.: Multilinear extensions and the banzhaf value. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 22(4), 741–750 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Penrose, L.S.: The elementary statistics of majority voting. J. R. Stat. Soc. 109(1), 53–57 (1946)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. Contrib. Theory Games 2(28), 307–317 (1953)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapley, L.S., Shubik, M.: A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 48(3), 787–792 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simma, B., Mosler, H., Paulus, A., Chaitidou, E.: The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thrall, R.M., Lucas, W.F.: N-person games in partition function form. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 10(1), 281–298 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

X. Molinero has been partially supported by funds from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and the European Union (FEDER funds) under grants MTM2015-66818-P (VOTA-COOP) and MDM-2014-044 (BGSMath).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Molinero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blasco, J., Molinero, X. (2020). Games with Multiple Alternatives Applied to Voting Systems. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, SH., Corchado, J. (eds) Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity. DECON 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1009. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38227-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics