Skip to main content

Biochar Technology for Environmental Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Biotechnology Vol. 2

Abstract

Biochar has been indicated as an amendment to degrade soils, improve carbon sequestration and increase agronomic productivity and future carbon trading markets. Intensive research has confirmed that biochar is part of the carbon with variable properties due to the result of production, e.g. feedstock and pyrolysis conditions and other factors like storage and transportation. Agronomic benefits from biochar additions to degrade soils have been emphasized. Soils are complex mixtures of solids, liquids, gases and living organisms, and adding biochar can change their physical, chemical and biological properties in several different ways. The research started to show which soil and biochar properties are responsible for these changes and to use them to improve crop growth and soil amendment or for environmental management. People are hopeful about the positive agronomic effects from potential biochar usage on climate impacts, but there is a lot still to be done.

Biochar can be produced at scales ranging from individual farm to large industrial level making it appropriate to a variety of socioeconomic situations. Various pyrolysis technologies are commercially available that yield different proportions of biochar and bioenergy products. The bio-oil produced may be used directly for low-grade heating applications and as a diesel substitute after suitable treatment. Pyrolysis processes consist of two major types, fast and slow, which refer to the speed at which the biomass is altered. Fast pyrolysis, with biomass residence times of a few seconds, generates more bio-oil and less biochar than slow pyrolysis. Slow process for which biomass residence time can range from hours to days. Also biochar produced from wood shavings is likely to be different from a biochar produced from dairy cow manure. The application of biochar on a worldwide basis has been undertaken to clearly understand ramifications in adapting the biochar technology. The challenges that are unique to regions in terms of physical, economic and chemical natures are taken up to devise future plans for this fascinating innovation in soil amendment and climate mitigation. Many organizations have accepted the responsibility to change the way carbon sequestration is realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya B, Dutta A, Minaret J (2015) Review on comparative study of dry and wet torrefaction. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 12:26–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad AS, Robert H (2014) Microwave pyrolysis of cellulose at low temperature. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 105:91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad AS, Ani FN (2011) Microwave induced pyrolysis of oil palm biomass. Bioresour Technol 102:3388–3395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asai H, Benjamin KS, Haefele MS, Khamdok S, Homma KO, Yoshiyuki K, Yoshio I, Tatsuhiko S, Takeshi H (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crop Res 111:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach QV, Skreiberg O (2016) Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: a review and comparison with dry torrefaction. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:665–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir MG, Witold K, James JL (2017) Hydrothermal carbonisation of poultry litter: effects of initial pH on yields and chemical properties of hydrochars. Bioresour Technol 238:78–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baum E, Weitner S (2006) Biochar application on soils and cellolosic ethanol production. In: Clean air task force, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley L, Marta M, Luca P, Veronica P, Guido F, Teresa F, Teofilo V, Marianna B, Nelson M (2013) Biochar addition to an arsenic contaminated soil increases arsenic concentrations in the pore water but reduces uptake to tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum). Sci Total Environ 454-455:598–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohon MD, Metzger BA, Linak WP, King CG, Roberts WL (2011) Glycerol combustion and emissions. Proc Combust Inst 33:2417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonjour S, Adair-Rohani H, Wolf J, Bruce NG, Mehta S, Prüss-Ustün A, Lahiff M, Eva AR, Mishra V, Smith KR (2013) Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980–2010. Environ Health Perspect 121:784–790

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer CE, Victoria JC, Caroline AM, Helge G, Xiaodong G, Brandon D, Laura ED, Pietro P, Kyriacos Z, Christian AD (2014) New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenergy 66:176–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater AV (2003) Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem Eng J 91:87–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgwater AV (2007) The production of biofuels and renewable chemicals by fast pyrolysis of biomass. Int J Global Energy Issues 27(2):160–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bu Q, Lei H, Ren S, Wang L, Holladay J, Zhang Q, Tang J, Ruan R (2011) Phenol and phenolics from lignocellulosic biomass by catalytic microwave pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 102:7004–7007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera A, Cox L, Spokas K, Hermosín MC, Cornejo J, Koskinen WC (2014) Influence of biochar amendments on the sorption–desorption of aminocyclopyrachlor, bentazone and pyraclostrobin pesticides to an agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ 470-471:438–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Van ZL, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Research 45:629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Wang J, Zhang M, Chen M, Zhu X, Min F (2008) Catalytic effects of eight inorganic additives on pyrolysis of pine wood sawdust by microwave heating. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 82:145–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Chen Z, Lv A (2011) A novel magnetic biochar efficiently sorbs organic pollutants and phosphate. Bioresour Technol 102:716–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chungen Y (2012) Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass for liquid biofuels production. Bioresour Technol 120:273–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das O, Sarmah AK (2015) Mechanism of waste biomass pyrolysis: effect of physical and chemical pre-treatments. Sci Total Environ 537:323–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta B, Raghavan V (2013) Socio-economic assessment of implementation of policy options for biochar systems as a mitigation strategy for greenhouse gas emissions- India as a case study. Inl J Clim Change Impacts Respons 4:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evita A, Dimitrios K, Evan D (2014) Ca and Fe modified biochars as adsorbents of arsenic and chromium in aqueous solutions. J Environ Manag 146:444–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013, Oct) Guidance note - safe access to firewood and alternative energy in humanitarian settings, pp 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermoso J, Moghtaderi C, Arias B, Pevida C, Plaza MG, Rubiera F, Pis JJ (2009) High- pressure gasification reactivity of biomass chars produced at different temperatures. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 85:287–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesapillai M, Manara P, Zabaniotou A (2016) Effect of microwave pretreatment on pyrolysis of crude glycerol-olive kernel alternative fuels. Energy Convers Manag 110:287–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghanim BM, Pandey DS, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ (2016) Hydrothermal carbonisation of poultry litter: effects of treatment temperature and residence time on yields and chemical properties of hydrochars. Bioresour Technol 216:373–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Birk JJ (2012) State of the scientific knowledge on properties and genesis of anthropogenic dark earths in Central Amazonia (terra preta de Índio). Geochim Cosmochim Acta 82:39–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guggenberger G, Rodionov A, Shibistova O, Grabe M, Kasansky OA, Fuchs H, Mikheyeva N, Zhazhevskaya G, Flessa H (2008) Storage and mobility of black carbon in permafrost soils in the forest tundra ecotone in northern Siberia. Glob Chang Biol 14:1367–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger MJ (2005) The ecology of power: culture, place and personhood in the Southern Amazon, AD 1000–2000. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger MJ, Petersen JB, Neves EG (1999) Village size and permanence in Amazonia: two archaeological examples from Brazil. Lat Am Antiq 10:353–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera LF, Cavelier I, Rodríguez C, Mora S (1992) The technical transformation of an agricultural system in the Colombian Amazon. World Archaeol 24:98–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husk B, Major J (2011) Biochar commercial agriculture field trial in Québec, Canada – year three: effects of biochar on forage plant biomass quantity, quality and milk production, Drummondville, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeff Schahczenski (2010) Biochar and sustainable agriculture 1–800–346-9140. A program of the National Center for Appropriate Technology, pp 1–12. www.attra.ncat.org

  • Jha P, Biswas AK, Lakaria BL, Rao AS (2010) Biochar in agriculture – prospects and related implications. Curr Sci 99:1218–1225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin SC, Sung HP, Sang-Chul J, Changkook R, Jong-Ki J, Min-Chul S, Young-Kwon P (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45:359–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kookana RS, Sarmah AK, Van ZL, Krull E, Singh B (2011) Biochar application to soil: agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. Adv Agron 112:103–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management. Sci Technol:68–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Czimczik C, Larid D, Sohi S (2009) Stability of biochar in soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, Stirling, pp 183–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici MM, Fühner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich KH (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:71–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machida M, Tomohide M, Hideki T (2006) Lead(II) adsorption onto the graphene layer of carbonaceous materials in aqueous solution. Carbon 44:2681–2688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, Goodale C (2010) Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Glob Chang Biol 16:1366–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyà JJ (2012) Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol 46(15):7939–7954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurizio V, Luca F (2012) From olive waste to solid biofuel through hydrothermal carbonisation: the role of temperature and solid load on secondary char formation and hydrochar energy properties. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 124:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH (2006) Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuel 20:848–889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nataša DM, Škrbić BD, Zabaniotou A (2016) Chemometric interpretation of different biomass gasification processes based on the syngas quality: assessment of crude glycerol co- gasification with lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:649–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveed AQ, Md Mukhlesur R, Seunggun W, Soomin S, Changsix R (2017) Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management and wastewater treatment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:255–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves EG, James BP, Robert NB, Michael JH (2004) The timing of Terra Preta formation in the Central Amazon: archaeological data from three sites. Explorations in Space and Time, Amazonian Dark Earths, pp 125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JM, Isabel L, Baoshan X, Julia WG, Christoph S, Das KC, Mohamed A, Djaafar R, Donald WW, Warren JB, Harry S (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci 3:195–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poritosh R, Goretty D (2017) Microwave pyrolysis of cellulose at low temperature. Prospects of pyrolysis technologies in bioenergy sector: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:59–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt K, Moran D (2010) Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of global biochar mitigation potential. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1149–1158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasul F, Ahmad A, Arif M, Mian IA, Ali K, Qayyum MF, Hussain Q, Aon M, Latif S, Sakrabani R, Saghir M, Pan G, Shackley S (2017) Biochar for agriculture in Pakistan. Sustain Agricult Rev 22:57–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy DHK, Seung-Mok L (2014) Magnetic biochar composite: facile synthesis, characterization and application for heavy metal removal. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 454:96–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renner R (2007) Rethinking biochar. Environ Sci Technol 41:5932–5933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reza MT, Freitas A, Yang X, Coronella CJ (2016) Wet air oxidation of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process liquid. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:3250–3254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt AC (1993) The rise and fall of the Amazon chiefdoms. L’Homme 33:255–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt AC(1999) The development of prehistoric complex societies, Amazonia: a tropical forest. In: Complex polities in the ancient tropical world: American Anthropological Association 9:13–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumpel C, Chaplot V, Planchon O, Bernadou J, Valentin C, Mariotti A (2006) Preferential Erosion of black carbon on steep slopes with slash and burn agriculture. Catena 54:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz SM, Sembres T, Roberts K, Whitman T, Wilson K, Lehmann J (2014) Biochar Systems for Smallholders in developing countries : leveraging current knowledge and exploring future potential for climate-smart agriculture. A World Bank Study, Washingtion, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth P, Budarin V, Gronnow M, Clark JH, Luque R (2012) Low temperature microwave-assisted vs conventional pyrolysis of various biomass feed stocks. J Nat Gas Chem 21:270–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simha P, Yadav A, Pinjari D, Pandit AB (2016) On the behaviour, mechanistic modelling and interaction of biochar and crop fertilizers in aqueous solutions. Resour Eff Technol 2:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KR, Pennise DM, Khummongkol P, Chaiwong V, Ritgeen K, Zhang J, Panyathanya W, Rasmussen RA, Khalil MAK, Thorneloe SA (1991) Greenhouse gases from small-scale combustion devices in developing countries: charcoal-making kilns in Thailand. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohi SP (2012) Carbon storage with benefits. Science 338:1034–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sohi S, Lopez-Capel E, Krull E, Bol R (2009) Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to guide future research. CSIRO land and water science report 05/09

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas K, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Ann Environ Sci 3:179–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spokas KA, Koskinen WC, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of woodchip biochar additions on greenhouse gas production and sorption/degradation of two herbicides in a Minnesota soil. Chemosphere 77:574–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan P, Ajit KS, Ron S, Oisik D, Mohammed F, Wei G (2015) A feasibility study of agricultural and sewage biomass as biochar, bioenergy and biocomposite feedstock: production, characterization and potential applications. Sci Total Environ 512:495–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Keshav CD, Marcos G, Bernhard F, Wolfgang Z (2008) Charcoal and smoke extract stimulate the soil microbial community in a highly weathered xanthic Ferralsol. Pedobiologia 51:359–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svetlana P, Jussi H, Fabian S, Esa V (2017) Biomass for industrial applications: the role of torrefaction. Renew Energy 111:265–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan X, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang X, Hu X, Gu Y, Yang Z (2015) Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 125:70–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tang J, Wenying Z, Kookana R, Arata K (2013) Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil. J Biosci Bioeng 116:653–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum DJ (2009) Biochar: carbon mitigation from the ground up. Environ Health Perspect 117:70–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinaju C, Wu C, Liu R, Shiyu Liu WF (2011) Effect of hot vapor filtration on the characterization of bio-oil from rice husks with fast pyrolysis in a fluidized-bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 102:6178–6185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Rojas D, Lehmann J, Hobbs P, Joseph S, Neufeldt H (2011) Biomass availability, energy consumption and biochar production in rural households of Western Kenya. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3537–3546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Undri A, Rosi L, Frediani M, Frediani P (2014) Fuel from microwave assisted pyrolysis of waste multilayer packaging beverage. Fuel 133:7–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Unger PW, Stewart BA, Parrb JF, Singh RP (1991) Crop residue management and tillage methods for conserving soil and water in semi-arid regions. Soil Tillage Res 20:219–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Stelt MJC, Gerhauser H, Kiel JHA, Ptasinski KJ (2011) Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3748–3762

    Google Scholar 

  • Van ZL, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of paper mill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wikberg H, Ohra-aho T, Pileidis F, Titirici MM (2015) Structural and morphological changes in Kraft lignin during hydrothermal carbonization. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:2737–2745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willis G, Nhamo C, Fungai ND, Mukome SM, Blessing N (2015) Biochar production and applications in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, constraints, risks and uncertainties. J Environ Manag 150:250–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, West TO, Page YL, Kyle GP, Zhang X, Collatz GJ, Imhoff ML (2015) Biogenic carbon fluxes from global agricultural production and consumption. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 29:1617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf D, JE Amonette, Alayne F, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:56

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaodong Z, Shuangxia Y, Xinping X, Lei C, Laizhi S, Baofeng Z, Hongyu S (2016) Stoichiometric synthesis of Fe/CaxO catalysts from tailored layered double hydroxide precursors for syngas production and tar removal in biomass gasification. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 120:371–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Xinde C, Ling Z (2013) Comparison of rice husk- and dairy manure-derived biochars for simultaneously removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions: role of mineral components in biochars. Chemosphere 92:955–961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav A, Ansari KB, Simha P, Gaikar VG, Pandit AB (2016) Vacuum pyrolysed biochar for soil amendment. Resour Eff Technol 2:S177–S185

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanai Y, Toyota K, Okazaki M (2007) Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53:181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Hari S, Bharat S, Sudhagar M (2017) Torrefaction of sorghum biomass to improve fuel properties. Bioresour Technol 232:372–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yunbo Z, Chuan P, Bibo X, Tengfei W, Caiting L, Guangming Z, Yun Z (2017) Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge for char production with different waste biomass: effects of reaction temperature and energy recycling. Energy 127:167–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabaniotou A, Damartzis T (2007) Modeling the intra-particle transport phenomena and chemical reactions of olive kernel fast pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 80:187–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhanaraj Sangeetha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ganesapillai, M., Singh, A., Sangeetha, D. (2020). Biochar Technology for Environmental Sustainability. In: Gothandam, K., Ranjan, S., Dasgupta, N., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Environmental Biotechnology Vol. 2. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38196-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics