Skip to main content

Sustainability of Public Pension Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Challenges of Pension Systems

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to review the main instruments and indicators used to measure the sustainability of PAYG pension systems. It will distinguish between defined contribution and defined benefit systems, due to the various implications that each of them has. It will also be necessary to review the different types of sustainability instruments, for example, those based on cash criteria, financial criteria set by the economic cycle and actuarial criteria. For the actuarial criteria, we will review the criteria of the internal rate of return (IRR) and the actuarial balance. Subsequently, we will review which countries publish official pension system sustainability data and what kind of indicators they choose. We will also use the databases of international organizations to analyse what level of pension system sustainability information is being provided. Finally, we will reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of each of the indicators and set a series of recommendations for the different countries in order to improve the information given on the sustainability of their pension systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We are facing what is known in the literature as a system of notional accounts. In this regard you can refer to Devesa and Vidal 2004.

  2. 2.

    In Spain a manifest was published in 2013, (Manifiesto 2013) signed by jurists and economists known as “In defense of the public pension system”, where such a statement was made.

  3. 3.

    There are several typologies for classification, but we have chosen to present the one that seems best from a financial-actuarial point of view.

  4. 4.

    For example, in many countries there are microdata of samples, enabling to carry out the calculations. In Spain, for example, they are made from the so-called Continuous Work History Sample, provided to researchers by the social security itself.

  5. 5.

    http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Social_protection_statistics_-_pension_expenditure_and_pension_beneficiaries#Expenditure_on_pensions_in_the_EU

References

  • Abío, G., Bonin, H., Gil, J., & Patxot, C. (1999). El impacto intergeneracional de la Reforma de las Pensiones en España: Un enfoque de Contabilidad generacional. Economic Journals ICE (Spanish Commercial Information), 65, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allianz-Pensions sustainability index. Available at: http://projectm-online.com/app/uploads/Allianz_2016_Pension_Sustainability_Index.pdf

  • Alonso, J. J., Devesa, J. E., Devesa, M., Domínguez, I., Encinas, B., & Meneu, R. (2016). A proposal of a pension adequacy index for the EU countries. Presentation II workshop on pensions and insurance 2016. Barcelona (Spain), 14 and 15 July 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmaseda, M., Melguizo, A., & Taguas, D. (2006). Las reformas necesarias en el sistema de pensiones contributivas en España. Moneda y Crédito, no. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandrés, E., & Cuenca, A. (1998). Equidad intrageneracional en las pensiones de jubilación. La reforma de 1997. Journal of Applied Economics, VI(18), 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea, J., & González-Páramo, J. M. (1996). Pensiones y prestaciones por desempleo. Bilbao: Foundation BBV Documenta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barea, J., Carpio, M., & Domingo, E. (1996). Escenarios de evolución del gasto público en pensiones y desempleo en el horizonte 2020. Bilbao: Foundation BBV Documenta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancas, F. J., Contreras, I., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2011). Construcción de indicadores sintéticos: una aproximación para maximizar la discriminación. ASEPUMA Annals, 19, 01–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, A., Montes, J., & Antón, V. (2000). Modelo para simular escenarios de gasto en pensiones contributivas de jubilación de la seguridad social. Ministry of Economy and Finance. Working Paper of the General Directorate for Budgetary Analysis and Programming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boado, M. C., & Vidal, C. (2008). El balance actuarial como indicador de la solvencia del sistema de reparto”. Working paper IVIE WP-EC 2008-02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G., & Shinkawa, T. (Eds.). (2006). Ageing and pension reform around the world: evidence from eleven countries. Edward Elgar Publishing, Great Britian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, J. (2000). Envejecimiento de la población y sistemas de pensiones. Journal of CEPAL, 72, 121–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, J., & Uthoff, A. (1999). Transitional fiscal costs and demographic factors in shifting from unfunded to funded pension in Latin America. Development Finance Series, no. 88, Santiago de Chile. CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Monetary, Financial and Balance of Payments Statistics. (2008). Statistical contribution to the review of the sustainability of public finances – Final report on the statistical measurement of the assets and liabilities of pension schemes in general government, CMFP 08/01/A6.1. Luxembourg. Available at: http://www.cmfb.org/pdf/TF%20on%20Pensions%20-%20Final%20report.pdf

  • Conde-Ruiz, J. I. (2017). Medidas para restaurar (o no) la sostenibilidad financiera de las pensiones (No. 2017-04). FEDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Peña, J. I. (2000). Planes de Previsión Social. Madrid: Pirámide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, M. (2007). El desequilibrio financiero-actuarial del sistema contributivo de pensiones de la Seguridad Social española. Doctoral Thesis. ISBN: 978-84-370-7067-4. Available at: http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-1128108-090646/

  • Devesa, J. E., & Devesa, M. (2008a). La deuda implícita y el desequilibrio financiero-actuarial de un sistema de pensiones. El caso del Régimen General de la Seguridad Social en España. Savings Bank Foundation (FUNCAS). Working Paper, no. 429, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, J. E., & Devesa, M. (2008b). Desequilibrio financiero-actuarial en el sistema de pensiones de jubilación del Régimen General. Journal of Applied Economics, XVI(46), 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, J. E., & Devesa, M. (2010). The cost and actuarial imbalance of pay-as-you-go systems: the case of Spain. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13(3), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, J. E., & Vidal, C. (2004). Cuentas nocionales de aportación definida (NDC’s). ¿Cuál hubiera sido el efecto de su implantación en el sistema de pensiones español? Moneda y Crédito, 219, 101–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, J. E., Lejárraga, A., & Vidal, C. (2002). El tanto de rendimiento de los sistemas de reparto. Journal of Applied Economics, X(30), 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devesa, J. E., Domínguez, I., & Nagore, A. (2013). La sostenibilidad financiera del sistema de desempleo contributivo en España. Análisis comparado 2009-2011. Annals of Spanish Actuaries, 19, 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durán, A. (1995). Rentabilidad de lo cotizado para pensiones. Economistas, no. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015). The 2015 ageing report. Underlying Assumptions and Projection Methodologies. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, J., & López-Casasnovas, G. (1999). Redistribution in the Spanish pension system: an approach to its life time effects. EEE-55, FEDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, J., & Patxot, C. (2002). Reformas de la financiación del sistema de pensiones. Journal of Applied Economics, X(28), 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, J., López-García, M. A., Onrubia, J., Patxot, C., & Souto, G. (2007). A projection model of the contributory pension expenditure of the Spanish social security system: 2004-2050. Spanish Tax Authorities/Journal of Public Economics, 182, 75–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhale, J., & Smetters, K. (2005). Measuring social security’s financial problems”. NBER Working Paper Series, no. 11060. Available at: http:www.nber.org/papers/w11060.

  • Herce, J. A., & Pérez-Díaz, V. (directors) (1995). La reforma del sistema público de pensiones en España. Research Service of La Caixa., Studies and reports collection, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzmann, R., Palacios, R., & Zviniene, A. (2004). Implicit pension debt: Measurement and scope in international perspective. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, no. 403. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Ridruejo, Z. (coordinator) (2008). El efecto de la inmigración en la sostenibilidad a medio y largo plazo del sistema de pensiones en España. Ministry of Work and Social Affairs. FIPROS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno, J. F., & Licandro, O. (1999). La tasa interna de rentabilidad y el equilibrio financiero del sistema español de pensiones de jubilación. Investigaciones Económicas, XXIII(1), 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC-EC, Joint Research Centre-European Commission. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and User guide. Paris (EU): OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manifiesto. (2013). En defensa del sistema público de pensiones. Available at http://documentopensiones.org/

  • Melbourne Mercer Global Pensions Index. Available at http://www.globalpensionindex.com/wp-content/uploads/MMGPI2016-Report.pdf

  • Monasterio, C., Sánchez, I., & Blanco, F. (1996). Equidad y estabilidad del sistema de pensiones en España. Bilbao: Foundation BBV Documenta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moral-Arce, I., Patxot, C., & Souto, G. (2008). La sostenibilidad del sistema de pensiones. Una aproximación a partir de la MCVL. Journal of Applied Economics, 16(E1), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • MTAS, Ministry of Work and Social Affairs. (2005). Informe de Estrategia de España en relación con el futuro del sistema de pensiones. Madrid: MTAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G. (2005). Measuring sustainability: A multi-criterion framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2009). Noncompensatory and nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: A defensible setting. Applied Economics, 41, 1513–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Papers, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Composite Leading Indicators. (2014). Methodological notes for the news release. Available at www.oecd.org/std/leading-indicators/44728410.pdf

  • Oria, I. Z., & Escudero, C. M. (2003). El futuro del sistema de pensiones en España. Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robalino, D. A., & Bodor, A. (2009). On the financial sustainability of earnings-related pension schemes with ‘pay-as-you-go’ financing and the role of government-indexed bonds. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 8(02), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State of the art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. Joint Research Centre, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1958). An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66, 467–482. https://goo.gl/1s73Ze.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, F., García, M. A., & Bravo, C. (2004). El sistema español de pensiones. Un proyecto viable desde un enfoque económico. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settergren, O. (2003). Financial and inter-generational balance? An introduction to how the Swedish pension system manages conflicting ambitions. Scandinavian Insurance Quarterly, 2, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Noord P., & Herd, P. (1993). Pension liabilities in seven major economies. Working Paper, no. 142. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). International patterns of pension provision II: A worldwide overview of facts and figures. Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper; No. 1211. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/13560.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Enrique Devesa-Carpio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex I

Annex I

Table 6.6 Expenditure on pensions (Eurostat)
Table 6.7 Old-age dependency ratio (Eurostat)
Table 6.8 Net social contributions (Eurostat)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Devesa-Carpio, J.E., Rosado-Cebrian, B., Álvarez-García, J. (2020). Sustainability of Public Pension Systems. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J., Domínguez-Fabián, I., Devolder, P. (eds) Economic Challenges of Pension Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37912-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics