Abstract
Recent reforms of public pension systems implemented in various countries, including Spain, have sought to ensure the sustainability of benefits. However, achieving a structural budget balance (i.e. long-run equality between income and expenditure) may result in a decrease in the replacement rate or in the percentage that the pension represents of the last salary. The development of complementary pension schemes, both occupational and personal, is presented as a feasible alternative for increasing the adequacy of benefits. However, both systems face significant challenges in their further implementation, with business structures, on occasions, being highly concentrated in small and medium enterprises and under the significant influence of longevity, inflation and interest rate risks. This chapter presents a comprehensive analysis of the possibilities offered by the second and the third pillars to complement public pension systems and their possible innovations for increasing their level of penetration in different countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A broad definition of these systems can be found in Barr (2006).
- 2.
Details can be consulted at http://www.nestpensionguide.co.uk.
- 3.
For a detailed historical analysis of these systems, see Valero (2013).
- 4.
This corresponds to the Taoist doctrine of wu wei, literally non-doing or passive achievement. Various editions of Tao Te Ching, ascribed to Lao Tzu, can be consulted; for instance Tzu (2016).
- 5.
See Benartzi et al. (2011) and their explanation of ‘framing’ in the case of annuitisation, in which they present the rents as ‘consumption frames’ and not as ‘investment frames’.
References
Acuña, R., Palomino, M., Villar, L., Villagómez, A., & Valero, D. (2015). Cómo fortalecer los sistemas de pensiones latinoamericanos. Experiencias, lecciones y propuestas. Sura Asset Management, Estudio Internacional, Tomo I.
Ambachtsheer, K. (2013). Designing ‘Defined Ambition’ pensions plans. A Frame for discussion. Rotman ICPM (International Centre for Pension Management). Rotman School of Management, 5(2).
Antolín, P. (2008a). Ageing and the payout phase of pensions, annuities and financial markets. OECD, Working Paper Series in Insurance and Private Pensions, 29.
Antolín, P. (2008b). Policy options for the payout phase. OECD, Working Paper Series in Insurance and Private Pensions, 25.
Antolín, P. (2013). The OECD roadmap for the good design of defined contribution pension plans. OECD DAF/FIN Pension Unit.
Barr, N. (2006). Non-financial defined contribution pensions: Mapping the terrain. In R. Holzmann & E. Palmer (Eds.), Pension reform: Issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes (pp. 57–69). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Barr, N., & Diamond, P. A. (2010). Pension reform. A short guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Benartzi, S., Previtero, A., & Thaler, R. H. (2011). Annuitization puzzles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 143–164.
Berstein, S., Morales, M., & Puente, A. (2015). Rol de un seguro de longevidad en América Latina: Casos de Chile, Colombia, México y Perú. Federación Internacional de Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones (FIAP), Octubre. Available from: http://www.fiapinternacional.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/rol_de_un_seguro_de_longevidad_en_latam_casos_chile__colombia__mexico_y_peru__octubre_2015_.pdf.
Blake, D. (2014). The consequences of not having to buy an annuity (Discussion Paper PI-1409). Pensions Institute, Cass Business School, City University. Available from: http://www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp1409.pdf.
Blake, D., & Boardman, T. (2010). Spend more today: Using behavioural economics to improve retirement expenditure decisions (Discussion Paper PI-1014). The Pensions Institute, British Library.
Blake, D., & Dowd, K. (2013). Good practice principles in modelling defined contribution pension plans. London: Pensions Institute, Cass Business School.
Department of Work and Pensions. (2012). Reinvigorating workplace pensions. London: Stationery Office.
European Commission (EC). (2015). The 2015 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). European Economy 3/2015. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2015/pdf/ee3_en.pdf.
Federación Internacional de Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones (FIAP). (2015). Modalidades de Pensión en los Sistemas de Capitalización Individual. FIAP, Nota de Pensiones, 6, Septiembre. Available from: http://www.fiapinternacional.org/nota-de-pensiones-no-6-modalidades-de-pension-en-los-sistemas-de-capitalizacion-individual/.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Groux.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.
National Employment Savings Trust Corporation (NEST). (2013). Annual report and accounts 2013 to 2014. London: NEST Corporation. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-employment-savings-trust-corporation-annual-report-and-accounts-2013-to-2014.
O’Brien, C., Fenn, P., & Diacon, S. (2005). How long do people expect to live? Results and implications. Centre for Risk and Insurance Studies, Nottingham University Business School. CRIS Research Report 2005–1. Available from: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/businesscentres/crbfs/documents/cris-reports/cris-paper-2005-1.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Pensions at a Glance 2013: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/pensions-at-a-glance-2013_pension_glance-2013-en.
Taleb, N. (2012). Antifragille. New York: Random House.
Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow: Using behavioural economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 164–187.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. New York: Penguin.
Tzu, L. (2016). Tao Te Ching. United States: Wisehouse Classics Edition.
United Nations. (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York. Available from: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2012_HIGHLIGHTS.pdf.
Valero, D. (2013). Tendencias en materia de pensiones privadas. El papel de las rentas vitalicias. In J. A. Herce (Ed.), Pensiones: una reforma medular (pp. 175–189). Madrid: Fundación de Estudios Financieros y Círculo de Empresarios.
Valero, D. (2015). Neuroeconomía y Economía del comportamiento de pensiones. Livro Técnico Congresso 2015, Asociación Brasileña de Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones (ABRAPP).
Van Galen, T., Kocken, T., & Lundbergh, S. (2014). Demystifying pension design: Clearer principles Foster. Better practices. Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 7(2), 1–7.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by ICREA Academia, the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the ERDF under grants ECO2015-66314-R and ECO2016-76203-C2-2-P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ayuso, M., Guillen, M., Valero, D. (2020). The Role of Complementary Pensions. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J., Domínguez-Fabián, I., Devolder, P. (eds) Economic Challenges of Pension Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37912-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37912-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37911-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37912-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)