Abstract
This book has argued that the heart of constructive design research is usually a design experiment; it is a key vehicle of knowledge creation. In this chapter we study design experiments through a fairly recent philosophical debate that has been targeted against the theory-centric view of research. It is called ‘new experimentalism,’ which argues that experiments often create knowledge regardless of theory. Following new experimentalism, the hypothesis we explore in this chapter is that design experiments generate knowledge, but also that there are several kinds of experimental protocols in constructive design research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We use the term Wissenschaft here to point to design being a research practice concerned about making and deriving knowledge rather than posing a body of knowledge as inscribed in the use of the term science. We will return to difference in the following concluding chapter.
References
Ahde-Deal, P. (2013). Women and jewelry: A social approach to wearing and possessing Jewelry. Helsinki: Aalto University.
Battarbee, K. (2004). Co-experience: Understanding user experiences in social interaction. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
Binder, T., De Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Linde, P., Jacucci, G., & Wagner, I. (2011). Design things. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Binder, T., & Redström, J. (2006, November 1–4). Exemplary design research. DRS Wonderground Conference, Lisbon.
Bowers, J. (2012). The logic of annotated portfolios: Communicating the value of research through design. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (pp. 68–77). New York: ACM.
Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy: Ontology I: The furniture of the world. London: Springer.
Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 937–946). New York: ACM.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Koskinen, I. (2003). Empathic Design in Methodic Terms. In I. Koskinen, K. Battarbee, & T. Mattelmäki (Eds.), Empathic design. Helsinki: IT Press.
Koskinen, I. (2016). “Agonistic, Convivial, and Conceptual Aesthetics in New Social Design.” Design Issues 32, no. 3 (July 2016): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00396
Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice. From the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kurvinen, E. (2007). Prototyping social action. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1974). “The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science.” Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4, no. 4 (1974): 309–325.
Mattelmäki, T. (2006). Design probes. Aalto University.
Mattelmäki, T., Kirsikka V., & Ilpo K. (2013). “What Happened to Empathic Design?” Design Issues 30, no. 1 (December 19, 2013): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00249
Mayo, D. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mikkonen, J. (2016). Prototyping interactions. Tampere: Tampere Univrsity of Technology.
Paavilainen, H. (2013). Dwelling with design. Helsinki: Aalto University.
Peteri, V. (2017). Bad enough ergonomics: A case study of an office chair. SAGE Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016685135.
Säde, S. (2001). Cardboard Mock-ups and Conversations. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.
Vaajakallio, K. (2012). Design games as a tool, a mindset and a structure. Helsinki: Aalto University.
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 493–502). New York: ACM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krogh, P.G., Koskinen, I. (2020). New Experimentalism. In: Drifting by Intention. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37896-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37896-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37895-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37896-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)