Skip to main content

Semantic Network Analysis of Ingroup and Outgroup Representations in Radical Social Movement Discourse. The Case of Russian Lesbian-Feminist Movement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1038))

Abstract

This paper operationalizes ingroup and outgroup image construction in the Russian lesbian-feminist movement discourse. To investigate the speech properties which are involved in the radical social movement discourse dissemination we employed semantic network analysis. In the study were analyzed two sources of data: from 574 lesbian-feminist groups in the social network “VKontakte” and from the 18 interviews with self-identified members of Russian lesbian-feminist community. Differences in the image construction in examined environments were discovered. The methodology for the “we” and “they” representations investigation presented in this article could be applied to the study of the other radical social movement’s discourses propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dalgaard-Nielsen, A.: Violent radicalization in Europe: what we know and what we do not know. Stud. Conflict Terrorism 33(9), 797–814 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.501423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dingley, J., Herman, S.: Terrorism, radicalisation and moral panics: media and academic analysis and reporting of 2016 and 2017 ‘terrorism’. Small Wars Insurgencies 28(6), 996–1013 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2017.1374597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitzgerald, K.J., Rodgers, D.M.: Radical social movement organizations: a theoretical model. Sociol. Q. 41(4), 573–592 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2000.tb00074.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Dijk, T.A.: Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse Soc. 4(2), 249–283 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koltsova, O., Nikolenko, S., Alexeeva, S., Nagornyy, O., Koltcov, S.: Detecting interethnic relations with the data from social media. In: Alexandrov, D.A., Boukhanovsky, A.V., Chugunov, A.V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 16–30. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bodrunova, S.S.: When context matters. Analyzing conflicts with the use of big textual corpora from Russian and international social media. Partecipazione e conflitto 11(2), 497–510 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eddington, S.M.: The communicative constitution of hate organizations online: a semantic network analysis of “Make America Great Again”. Soc. Media Soc. 4(3), 205630511879076 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118790763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leydesdorff, L., Nerghes, A.: Co-word maps and topic modeling: a comparison using small and medium-sized corpora (N < 1,000). J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68(4), 1024–1035 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Appel, O., et al.: A hybrid approach to the sentiment analysis problem at the sentence level. Knowl.-Based Syst. 108, 110–124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, G.J., et al.: Semantic network analysis of vaccine sentiment in online social media. Vaccine 35(29), 3621–3638 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Šćepanović, S., et al.: Semantic homophily in online communication: Evidence from Twitter. Online Soc. Netw. Media 2, 1–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2017.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sánchez-Rada, J.F., Iglesias, C.A.: Onyx: a linked data approach to emotion representation. Inf. Process. Manage. 52(1), 99–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong, Y., et al.: Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Rev. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He, Y., Tan, J.: Study on SINA micro-blog personalized recommendation based on semantic network. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(10), 4797–4804 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong, Y.J., et al.: High/low reputation companies’ dialogic communication activities and semantic networks on Facebook: a comparative study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 110, 78–92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hosseini, M., et al.: Supporting sustainable system adoption: Socio-semantic analysis of transit rider debates on social media. Sustain. Cities Soc. 38, 123–136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, K., et al.: Semantic network analysis reveals opposing online representations of the search term “GMO”. Global Challenges 2(1), 1700082 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lycarião, D., dos Santos, M.A.: Bridging semantic and social network analyses: the case of the hashtag #precisamosfalarsobreaborto (we need to talk about abortion) on Twitter. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20(3), 368–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1168469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobsson, K., Lindblom, J.: Emotion work in animal rights activism: a moral-sociological perspective. Acta Sociol. 56(1), 55–68 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699312466180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kteily, N.S., Bruneau, E.: Darker demons of our nature: the need to (re)focus attention on blatant forms of dehumanization. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26(6), 487–494 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417708230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oxana Mikhailova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mikhailova, O., Gradoselskaya, G. (2019). Semantic Network Analysis of Ingroup and Outgroup Representations in Radical Social Movement Discourse. The Case of Russian Lesbian-Feminist Movement. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O., Musabirov, I. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1038. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37858-5_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37857-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37858-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics