Skip to main content

Understanding Political Sociology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Politics and Society
  • 797 Accesses

Abstract

The historian of culture Thomas Kuhn in his book on The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, published in 1962, shows that, because of the implicit characteristics of their objects, the social sciences struggle to identify with the single paradigm of a shared global vision of the scientific community’s disciplinary matrix. Most of them are stalled at the pre-paradigmatic stage of the “schools” which are distinguished by their methodological perspective and orientation. Notwithstanding this, scholars have tried to develop cultural perspectives and scientific models in an attempt to contribute to the formation of paradigms, which however are only recognised for a short period by a large proportion of the international sociological and political community. First of all, we are referring to the tendency expressed by “behaviourism”, which first developed in psychology and only later in the sociological disciplines. It was a true epistemological revolution which gave rise to various approaches, from the systemic perspective to structural functionalism, through to the elaborations of scholars who identified with the variegated world of theories of action, all attributable to a certain methodological individualism. In this chapter, we will try to retrace the parameters and the salient features of these approaches to the study of political phenomena. At the end we will devote a specific section to neo-institutionalism, which has profoundly influenced sociological-political research in the last few decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almond, G. A., & Coleman, J. S. (Eds.). (1960). The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Powell, B. G. (1966). Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Apter, D. E. (1965). The Politics of Modernization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L., et al. (Eds.). (1971). Crisis and Sequences in Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (1995). Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. Unpublished Paper Presented at Harvard University during the Seminar on the State and Capitalism since 1800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D., & Collier, R. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1961). The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest. American Political Science Review, 55, 763–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. W. (1961). Social Mobilization and Political Development. American Political Science Review, 3, 493–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. W. (1963). The Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry Into The State of Political Science. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1957). An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics, 9, 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1965). A System Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1986). Introduction. In J. Elster (Ed.), Rational Choice (pp. 1–33). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J., & Hylland, A. (Eds.). (1986). Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. B., Rueschmeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1985). Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1963). A Conception of, and Experiment with, «Trust» as Condition of Stabled Concerted Actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction. New York: The Ronald Press Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1968). Power in the Recent Writings of Talcott Parsons. Sociology, 2, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (1988). Ideas, Institutions and American Trade Policy. International Organization, 42(1), 179–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1982). Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. (1977). Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1993). Exit, Voice, and the Fate of the German Democratic Republic. An Essay in Conceptual History. World Politics, 45(1), 173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1964). Zweck-Herrschaft-System. Grundbegriffe und Prämisse MaxWebers. Der Staat, 3, 129–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1966). Politische Plannung. Jahrbuchfür Sozialwissenschaft, 17, 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1968). Soziologie als Theorie Sozialer Systeme. Kӧlner Zeitschriftfür Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 20, 705–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1975). Macht. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. (1985 [1883]). Investigations Into the Methods of Social Sciences. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1949). Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Forma Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational Environment: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logics of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organski, A. F. K. (1965). The Stages of Political Development. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1959). Voting, and the Equilibrium of the American Political System. In E. Burdick & A. Brodbeck (Eds.), American Voting Behavior (pp. 58–93). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1966). The Political Aspect of Social Structure and Process. In D. Easton (Ed.), Varieties of Political Theory (pp. 71–112). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1969). Politics and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, L. W. (1966). Aspects of Political Development. Boston: Little Brown e Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, L. W., & Verba, S. (1965). Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H., & Ordershook, P. C. (1968). A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1969). Models and Methods in the Comparative Study of Nation-Building. Acta Sociologica, 12, 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1962). Collected Papers (Vol. I). The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T. S. (1968). Parsons’ Concept of ‘Generalized Media of Social Interaction’ and Its Relevance for Social Anthropology. Sociological Inquiry, 38(Spring), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1935). Socialist Calculation II: The State of the Debate. In AA.VV (Ed.), Collectivist Economic Planning. London: George Routledge and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1952). The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies of the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. W. N. (1973). Methodological Individualism: A Reply. In J. O’Neil (Ed.), Modes of Individualism and Collectivism (pp. 179–184). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949 [1922]). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio de Nardis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Nardis, F. (2020). Understanding Political Sociology. In: Understanding Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37760-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics