Abstract
A possible approach to support students during modelling activities is to supply them with a ‘solution plan’ – a simplified modelling cycle that provides strategies in each step and thus serves as a metacognitive strategic guidance. This chapter reports on an intervention study that investigates if modelling with a newly developed five-step solution plan influences the development of students’ modelling competencies. The study was carried out in a pre-post-follow-up design with 29 classes of German secondary schools and evaluated within the frame of item response theory using a test instrument focussing on subcompetencies of modelling. Results regarding the subcompetencies simplifying, mathematising, interpreting, and validating are presented. The results reveal differences in the development of competencies between students working with a solution plan and students working without such an instrument.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The DISUM project (‘didactical intervention modes for mathematics teaching oriented towards self-regulation and directed by tasks’) was founded in Kassel and is led by W. Blum, R. Messner, and R. Pekrun.
References
Blomhøj, M., & Kjeldsen, T. H. (2006). Teaching mathematical modelling through project work. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(2), 385–395.
Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 15–30). Dordrecht: Springer.
Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice (pp. 73–96). Cham: Springer.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(2), 143–162.
Greefrath, G. (2015). Problem solving methods for mathematical modelling. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice (pp. 173–183). Cham: Springer.
Greefrath, G., & Vorhölter, K. (2016). Teaching and learning mathematical modelling. Approaches and developments from German speaking countries (ICME-13 topical surveys). Cham: Springer.
Hankeln, C., Adamek, C., & Greefrath, G. (2018). Assessing sub-competencies of mathematical modelling with the help of item response theory – Presentation of a new test instrument. In G. Stillman & J. Brown (Eds.), Lines of inquiry in mathematical modelling research in education (ICME-13 monograph series). Cham: Springer.
Kaiser, G. (2007). Modelling and modelling competencies in school. In C. R. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics (pp. 110–119). Chichester: Horwood.
Maaß, K. (2004). Mathematisches Modellieren im Unterricht. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. Hildesheim: Franzbecker Verlag.
Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(2), 113–142.
Niss, M. (2004). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagtsis & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), 3rd Mediterranean conference on mathematical education, January 2003 (pp. 3–5). Athens: The Hellenic Mathematical Society.
Schukajlow, S., Kolter, J., & Blum, W. (2015). Scaffolding mathematical modelling with a solution plan. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1241–1254.
Smit, J., van Eerde, H. A. A., & Bakker, A. (2013). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 817–834.
Stillman, G. (2011). Applying metacognitive knowledge and strategies in applications and modelling tasks at secondary school. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 165–180). Dordrecht: Springer.
Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Galbraith, P. (2010). Identifying challenges within transition phases of mathematical modeling activities at year 9. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 385–398). New York: Springer.
Zech, F. (1998). Grundkurs Mathematikdidaktik. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.
Zöttl, L., Ufer, S., & Reiss, K. (2010). Modelling with heuristic worked examples in the KOMMA learning environment. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 31(1), 143–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beckschulte, C. (2020). Mathematical Modelling with a Solution Plan: An Intervention Study About the Development of Grade 9 Students’ Modelling Competencies. In: Stillman, G.A., Kaiser, G., Lampen, C.E. (eds) Mathematical Modelling Education and Sense-making. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37672-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37673-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)