Skip to main content

The Recall Revival and Its Mixed Implications for Democracy: Evidence from Latin America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Recall Elections

Abstract

Focussing on the Latin American region, this chapter builds on previous findings with two aims: first, to both identify different intraregional paths and, second, to analyse under what conditions recall has an effect (positive or negative) on democracy. In doing so, three aspects arise. First, there are origins and terms of the legal provisions for recall. Second, there are the actual arrangements that emerge. Third, the discursive level requires separate consideration since recall is not only an institution and a practice but also “a challenge” and a citizen’s demand. This third section gives particular attention to Mexico, where the regulation of a particular form of recall has recently been announced by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and just now enacted in parliament (October 2019). This threefold approach provides the basis for a concluding discussion about the relationship between recall and broader processes of democratization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This section is based on the arguments developed in Welp and Castellanos (2019).

References

  • Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R. (1990). The Transition from Traditional to Broker Clientelism in Colombia: Political Stability a Social Unrest. Kellogg Institute Working Paper #140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arques, F. (2014). Argentina: una herramienta de los gobernados en manos de los gobernantes. In Y. Welp & U. Serdült (Eds.), La dosis hace el veneno: la revocatoria del mandato en Suiza, Estados Unidos y América Latina (pp. 159–186). Consejo Nacional Electoral: Serie Ciencia y Democracia. Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascarrunz, J., & Welp, Y. (2019). La revocatoria de mandato en Bolivia: análisis de limitaciones y propuesta de reformas [Recall election in Bolivia: limitations analysis and reform proposal]. Red de Participación Ciudadana y Control Social, Documento de Análisis Nº 01/2019 (p. 24). Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, A. (2008). Una mirada suiza sobre la democracia directa en América Latina. In A. Lissidini, Y. Welp, & D. Zovatto (Coords.), Democracia Directa en Latinoamerica. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinks, D. (2012). The Transformation of the Latin America State-as-law: State Capacity and the Rule of Law. Revista de Ciencia Política, 32(3), 561–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos, A. S. (2014). Ecuador: la transformacion de las reglas del juego y sus consequencias (1998–2013). In Y. Welp & U. Serdült (Eds.), La dosis hace el veneno: la revocatoria del mandato en Suiza, Estados Unidos y América Latina (pp. 83–110). Serie Ciencia y Democracia. Quito: Consejo Nacional Electoral.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, T. E. (1989). Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R., Bürklin, W., & Drummond, A. (2001). Public Opinion and Direct Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 12, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garret, E. (2004). Democracy in the Wake of the California Recall. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153, 239–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán Hernández, Y. (2014). Cuba: deudas pasadas y retos presentes desde la norma. In Y. Welp & U. Serdült (Eds.), La dosis hace el veneno: la revocatoria del mandato en Suiza, Estados Unidos y América Latina (pp. 187–205). Serie Ciencia y Democracia. Quito: Consejo Nacional Electoral.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (2006). Role of The Political Elite in Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes. Party Politics, 12(5), 599–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, L., & Sanabria, P. (2013). The Shape of Corruption: Colombia as a Case Study. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(11), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.800858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limón, W. (2016). Revocación del mandato en México. C2D Working Paper Series 51/2016. ISSN 1662-8152. Retrieved from http://www.zora.uzh.ch/view/subjectsnew/C2D.html.

  • Negretto, G. (2013). Making, Constitutions. Presidents, Parties and Institutional Design in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S. (2001). Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 651–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serdült, U., & Welp, Y. (2012). Direct Democracy Upside Down. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 8(1), 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuesta Soldevilla, F. (Ed.). (2014). Una onda expansiva. Lima: Jurado Nacional de Elecciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welp, Y. (2016). Recall Referendums in Peruvian Municipalities: A Political Weapon for Bad Losers or an Instrument of Accountability? Democratization, 23(7), 1162–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welp, Y., & Castellanos, A. S. (2019). Understanding the Use of Recall Referendums: Evidence from Ecuador. International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119830373.

  • Welp, Y., & Milanese, J. P. (2018). Playing by the Rules of the Game. The Partisan Use of Recall Referendums in Colombia. Democratization, 25(8), 1379–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (2011). Enlivening the Concept of Democratization: The Biological Metaphor. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711000909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (2017). Between the ‘Fiction’ of Representation and the ‘Faction’ of Direct Democracy. In S. Ruth, Y. Welp, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Let the People Rule? Direct Democracy in the Twenty-first Century. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (2018). The Recall of Elected Officeholders the Growing Incidence of a Venerable, But Overlooked, Democratic Institution. Democratization, 1341–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaremberg, G., & Welp, Y. (2019). Beyond Utopian and Dystopian Approaches to Democratic Innovation. Recerca. Online first.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Welp, Y., Whitehead, L. (2020). The Recall Revival and Its Mixed Implications for Democracy: Evidence from Latin America. In: Welp, Y., Whitehead, L. (eds) The Politics of Recall Elections. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37610-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics