Skip to main content

The Political Theory of the Recall. A Study in the History of the Ideas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Recall Elections

Abstract

This chapter traces the development of the recall in the history of political philosophy from the Roman Republic to present-day republican thought. The chapter outlines how the institution was discussed by Karl Marx before it became an integral part of the political doctrines of respectively Vladimir Lenin and Antonio Gramsci, how the recall was championed by American centre-left progressives and how the institution was paradoxically utilised by Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger.

I am grateful to Laurence Whitehead and Yanina Welp for their helpful suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The law targeted Cicero in person. His political career was based on his success as prosecutor of individual officeholders for misconduct. He then wrote The Laws clarifying that whereas prosecutors must act on individual cases, all laws should be impersonal. That was his lasting contribution to our concept of the ‘rule of law’.

References

  • Abbott, F. (1915, January). The Referendum and Recall Among the Ancient Romans. Sewanee Review, pp. 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, B. (1988). The Liberty of the Ancients Compared to that of the Moderns. In M. Gauchet (Ed.), Benjamin Constant: Écrits politique (pp. 589–619). Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, T. E. (1999). Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dando, W. A. (1966). Map of the Election to the Russian Constituent Assembly of 1917. Slavic Review, 25(2), 310–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Montesquieu, C. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P. H. (1923). Occupational versus Proportional Representation. American Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figes, O. (1996). The People’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1891–1924. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, S. (2017). The Russian Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxley, R. (2013). The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1978). Selections from Political Writings. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, N. (1996). Leninism. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, K. (1911). Parlamentarismus und Demokratie. Stuttgart: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketcham, R. (2003). The Anti-Federalist Papers. New York: Signet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labriola, A. (1897). Contro il referendum. Roma: Uffici della critica sociale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, H. (1938). A Grammar of Politics. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1917a). Report on the Right of Recall. In Lenin: Collected Works (pp. 338–339). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1917b). Theses on the Constituent Assembly. In Lenin: Collected Works (pp. 379–383). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1918). Draft Decree on the Right of Recall. In Lenin: Collected Works (pp. 336–337). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. L. (1977). The State and the Revolution. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. (1931). Legislative Principles. The History and Theory of Law Making by Representative Government. Boston and New York: Houghton, Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, R. (1984a). Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy. In P. Hudis & K. B. Anderson (Eds.), The Rosa Luxemburg Reader (pp. 48–65). New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, R. (1984b). What Does the Spartacus League Want? In P. Hudis & K. B. Anderson (Eds.), The Rosa Luxemburg Reader (pp. 312–374). New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, R. (1984c). The Russian Revolution. In P. Hudis & K. B. Anderson (Eds.), The Rosa Luxemburg Reader (pp. 281–311). New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. (2005). The Constitutional Convention. New York: Modern Library Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsilius of Padua. (1988). The Defender of Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1970). Critique of the Gotha Program. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Selected Works (pp. 13–30). Moscow Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1973). Der Bürgerkrieg in Frankreich. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Werke 17 (pp. 313–365). Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2005). Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei. Frankfurt aM: Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, D. (1991). Karl Kautsky. In D. Miller (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp. 267–268). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, W. B. (1912). The Initiative, Referendum and Recall. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, N. (1985). L’État, le pouvoir, le socialism. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1964a). Du Contrat Social. In B. Gagnebin & M. Raymond (Eds.), Rousseau, Jean-Jacques: Oeuvres complétes III (pp. 349–471). Paris Gallimard: Écrites Politique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1964b). Considérations sur le Gouvernement de Pologne. In B. Gagnebin & M. Raymond (Eds.), Rousseau: Oeuvres complétes III (pp. 953–1044). Paris Gallimard: Écrites Politique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serdült, U., & Welp, Y. (2017). The Levelling Up of a Political Institution: Perspectives on the Recall Referendum. In S. Ruth, L. Whitehead, & Y. Welp (Eds.), Let the People Rule? Direct Democracy in the 20th Century (pp. 137–154). Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurlin, P. M. (1969). Rousseau in America, 1760–1809, Tuscaloosa Al. University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. W. (1892). Direct Legislation by the Citizenship. New York: Twentieth Century Publishing Company & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, W. H. (1913). Popular Government: Its Essence, Its Permanence and Its Perils. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, E. D. (1994). “Rosa Luxemburg Belongs to Us!” German Communism and the Luxemburg Legacy. Central European History, 27(1), 27–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R. H. (1929). The Initiative, Referendum and Recall in German Cities. National Municipal Review, 18(1), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, W. E. (1919). The New Democracy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. A. (1910). The Old Order Changeth: A View of American Democracy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S., & Hill, R. J. (1996). Russia, The Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe: The Referendum as a Flexible Political Instrument. In M. Gallagher & P. V. Uleri (Eds.), The Referendum Experience in Europe. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. (1912). Government by All the People: The Initiative, the Referendum and the Recall as Instruments of Democracy. New York: Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamoyski, A. (1987). The Polish Way. In A Thousand-Year History of the Poles and their Culture. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. F. (1997). The Recall. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Legal Cases:

  • Hilzinger v. Gillman 56 Washington 228 (Washington Supreme Court 1909), 233.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Qvortrup, M. (2020). The Political Theory of the Recall. A Study in the History of the Ideas. In: Welp, Y., Whitehead, L. (eds) The Politics of Recall Elections. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37610-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics