Skip to main content

Impact of IoT on the Healthcare Producers: Epitomizing Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Internet of Things Use Cases for the Healthcare Industry

Abstract

Internet of things (IoT) emerged as a promising technology in the last decade and predicted to be ascendant in the next. Its application in the producer side of the healthcare industry is still in the nascent stage but expected to increase manifold in the near future. The purpose of this chapter is twofold; first, illuminate on the IoT applications on the pharmaceutical manufacturing and supply chain practices with real examples, and second elaborate the wide avenue of the opportunity of IoT it has in the drug discovery. Where most of the previous works argue the prospect of IoT in the conceptual or theoretical manner, we, however, intend to show the utility of automatic information processing in the context of computational drug design, which is an integral part of the drug discovery process. We integrate quantitative structure relationships with activity (QSAR), property (QSPR), and toxicity (QSTR) by utilizing an optimization technique to come up with a combined decision model. Numerical analysis has been performed with the developed optimization model considering three different cases using a simple chemical structure to test the model. Results suggest that the developed mathematical model can successfully be able to integrate QSAR, QSPR, and QSTR parameters which in terms of aid in automatic information and data capturing and lessen human efforts. This automatization can help in generating “optimal” drug candidates by considering all necessary facets. The present chapter also discusses other aspects of the healthcare producers where IoT can be proven beneficial in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burns LR (2014) India’ s healthcare industry: innovation in delivery, financing, and manufacturing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shrivastava A (2015) NextGen pharma takes “smart” strides with internet of things

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meek T (2018) How IoT is revolutionizing the pharma industry. https://samsungnext.com/whats-next/iot-pharma-biotech/

  4. Maroto F (2019) Is the internet of things changing manufacturing? In: Datafloq. https://datafloq.com/read/internet-of-things-changing-manufacturing/1057. Accessed 7 July 2019

  5. Sridhar A, Varia H (2016) The healthcare industry could have a lot riding on IoT. Indiatimes

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kissick WL (1994) Medicine’s dilemmas: infinite needs versus finite resources. Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ashburn TT, Thor KB (2004) Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Bioinformatics Institute (2018) Train online: drug discovey. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/training/online/course/functional-genomics-i-introduction-and-designing-e/functional-genomics-case-studies/drug-disc. Accessed 13 June 2019

  9. Liljefors T, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Madsen U (2002) Textbook of drug design and discovery. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  10. Güner FO (2000) Pharmacophore perception, development, and use in drug design, vol 2. Internat’l University Line

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen CN (1996) Guidebook on molecular modeling in drug design. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown FK (1998) Chemoinformatics: what is it and how does it impact drug discovery. Annu Rep Med Chem 33:375–384

    Google Scholar 

  13. Verma J, Khedkar V, Coutinho E (2010) 3D-QSAR in Drug Design—a review. Curr Top Med Chem 10:95–115. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802610790232260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foye WO (2008) Foye’s principles of medicinal chemistry. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scior T, Medina-Franco J, Do Q-T et al (2009) How to recognize and workaround pitfalls in QSAR studies: a critical review. Curr Med Chem 16:4297–4313. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986709789578213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dudek a Z, Arodz T, Gálvez J (2006) Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): a review. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 9:213–228. https://doi.org/10.2174/138620706776055539

  17. Katritzky A, Lobanov V, Karelson M (1995) QSPR: the correlation and quantitative prediction of chemical and physical properties from structure. Chem Soc Rev 24:279–287. https://doi.org/10.1039/cs9952400279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karelson M, Lobanov VS, Katritzky AR (1996) Quantum-chemical descriptors in QSAR/QSPR studies. Chem Rev 96:1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr950202r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carlsen L, Kenessov BN, Batyrbekova SY (2008) A QSAR/QSTR study on the environmental health impact by the rocket fuel 1,1-dimethyl hydrazine and its transformation products. Environ Health Insights 1:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2009.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cronin MTD, Dearden JC (1995) QSAR in toxicology: 1.-prediction of aquatic toxicity. Quant Struct Relationsh 14:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garg D, Gandhi T, Gopi Mohan C (2008) Exploring QSTR and toxicophore of hERG K+ channel blockers using GFA and HypoGen techniques. J Mol Graph Model 26:966–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Das RN, Roy K (2013) Advances in QSPR/QSTR models of ionic liquids for the design of greener solvents of the future. Mol Divers 17:151–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-012-9413-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kleandrova VV, Luan F, González-Díaz H et al (2014) Computational tool for risk assessment of nanomaterials: novel QSTR-perturbation model for simultaneous prediction of ecotoxicity and cytotoxicity of uncoated and coated nanoparticles under multiple experimental conditions. Environ Sci Technol 48:14686–14694. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503861x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rücker C, Rücker G, Meringer M (2007) Y-randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR. J Chem Inf Model 47:2345–2357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yee LC, Wei YC (2012) Current modeling methods used in QSAR/QSPR. In: Statistical modelling of molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR, pp 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10051978

  26. Gramatica P (2007) Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb Sci 26:694–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200610151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK (2003) The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci 22:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200390007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barchetti U, Bucciero A, De Blasi M et al (2010) RFID, EPC and B2B convergence towards an item-level traceability in the pharmaceutical supply chain. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE international conference on RFID-technology and applications. IEEE, pp 194–199

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chamekh M, El Asmi S, Hamdi M, Kim TH (2017) Context aware middleware for RFID based pharmaceutical supply chain. In: 2017 13th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC). IEEE, pp 1915–1920

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jara AJ, Alcolea AF, Zamora MA, et al (2010) Drugs interaction checker based on IoT. In: 2010 internet things. IEEE, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOT.2010.5678458

  31. Jara AJ, Zamora MA, Skarmeta AF (2014) Drug identification and interaction checker based on IoT to minimize adverse drug reactions and improve drug compliance. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 18:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0622-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang G, Xie L, Mäntysalo M et al (2014) A health-IoT platform based on the integration of intelligent packaging, unobtrusive bio-sensor, and intelligent medicine box. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 10:2180–2191. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2307795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Roy SN, Srivastava SK, Gururajan R (2018) Integrating wearable devices and recommendation system: towards a next generation healthcare service delivery. J Inf Technol 19:4–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuhin Sengupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Tutorial for Building Optimization Model in Excel Solver

Appendix: Tutorial for Building Optimization Model in Excel Solver

We have provided a step-by-step procedure to prepare the excel solver input–output analysis for solving the linear optimization model. After each step, readers are advised to check their formulated model in the excel file with the figures provided for the proper reproducibility. However, it is a better approach to build own model first and then cross-verify with the tutorial figures for a complete understanding.

  • STEP 1: Writing the decision variable and parameters row-wise so as to ensure that multiplication and addition between variables and parameters turn out to be easy when we formulate the objective function. For all the six positions in the structure, we prepare the excel for ADME property, therapeutic value, toxicity value, and the decision variable line, i.e., choice of ith element in the Nth position. We then provide the value for the parameters and set the value of the cells under decision variables to zero. Figure 1 is the screenshot for further understanding.

    Fig. 1
    figure 1

    Preparing the excel for decision variables and parameters input for solver analysis

  • STEP 2: Next, we prepare and formulate the objective function with the help of STEP 1 where we prepared the entire input matrix of decision variables and parameters. Therefore, we first prepare the multiplicative operations, i.e., ADME Property * (Therapeutic Value – Toxicity Value) * Decision Variable. We then add all such cells for each of the cells prepared from the input matrix. Please refer Fig. 2a, b for further clarity in this regard.

    Fig. 2
    figure 2figure 2

    a Formulating the objective function in line with the input matrix formed from decision variables and parameters. b Formulating the objective function in line with the input matrix formed from decision variables and parameters

  • STEP 3: Now we prepare the constraints in the excel sheet. The first constraint is to ensure that all the values as entered in STEP 2 are greater than or equal to zero. In the absence of this constraint, the excel solver may assume negative values for a particular cell. The next set of constraints (one constraint for each position) is to ensure that only one element is fixed to a position. We show the formula for each constraint in separate screenshots as shown in Fig. 3a–g for the purpose of clarity to the students.

    Fig. 3
    figure 3figure 3figure 3figure 3figure 3figure 3figure 3

    a Screenshot for Constraint 1 in the optimization model. b Screenshot for Constraint 2 in the optimization model. c Screenshot for Constraint 3 in the optimization model. d Screenshot for Constraint 4 in the optimization model. e Screenshot for Constraint 5 in the optimization model. f Screenshot for Constraint 6 in the optimization model. g Screenshot for Constraint 7 in the optimization model

  • STEP 4: Next we prepare the optimization algorithm by initiating the solver function in excel. Students should first go to the “Data” tab and at the right-hand most corners, EXCEL SOLVER will be present. Students are advised to first click the button. A pop-up screen will appear. Students will just need to select the (A) objective function, (B) maximization or minimization option, (C) select the decision variables, and (D) select the constraints. Please note that in addition to the constraints explained in STEP 3, we have also incorporated the binary constraint for the decision variable. Then, we have to click the options button and then click “Assume Non-Negative” and “Assume Linear Model” to ensure that the optimization model is a linear programming problem and all the decision variables are non-negative. Then, we click solve to get our answer. Refer Fig. 4a, b for further understanding.

    Fig. 4
    figure 4figure 4

    a Initiating the solver function in the Excel and incorporating the constraints, decision variables, and objective function. b Incorporating linearity and non-negativity in the optimization model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roy, S.N., Sengupta, T. (2020). Impact of IoT on the Healthcare Producers: Epitomizing Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery Process. In: Raj, P., Chatterjee, J., Kumar, A., Balamurugan, B. (eds) Internet of Things Use Cases for the Healthcare Industry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37526-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37526-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37525-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37526-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics