Skip to main content

Applying Business Architecture Principles with Domain-Specific Ontology for ACM Modelling: A Building Construction Project Example

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 362))

Abstract

Adaptive Case Management (ACM) empowers knowledge workers of any industry by utilizing their experience in the execution of business cases. It is designed to handle non-repetitive processes, where the course of actions has to be decided for each case individually, based on the assessment of the current situation. ACM uses domain-specific data and the analysis of rules to provide the relevant information at the right time to the business users. This supports their actions and decision making but does not dictate predefined workflows that are difficult or even impossible to define for knowledge-intensive work and prevent users from efficiently achieving their goals. Solutions for ACM implementations need to focus on business requirements to support business users rather than limit them by extending existing tools such as content management systems, BPM-based software suites, or collaboration tools with ad hoc development that all lack the ability to adapt flexibly to business level changes without requiring significant IT development efforts. To tackle these challenges, this paper proposes a novel approach by applying business architecture concepts for the definition of ACM applications in combination with domain-specific ontologies and business rules. Business domain analysts describe with the domain-specific ontology the complete value stream with its goals, activities and rules which use a formalized natural business language. The resulting business information model is mapped to an underlying data model and instantly enacted during case execution so that adaptations get immediately available to the business users. The behavioral business rules guide business users to guarantee case compliance which facilitates an easy and rapid adaptation of business applications. We apply this approach to a real life example from the construction industry where several parties from different trades have to collaborate in heterogeneous environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACORD reference architecture, November 2018. https://www.acord.org/standards-architecture/reference-architecture

  2. Aggarwal, A.: Industry reference blueprint for insurance, January 2015. http://www.referenceblueprint.com/

  3. Business Architecture Guild: A Guide to the Business Architecture Body of Knowledge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Business Architecture Guild: The Business Architecture Quick Guide. Meghan-Kiffer Press, The Netherlands (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandic, I., Music, D., Leitner, P., Dustdar, S.: VieSLAF framework: enabling adaptive and versatile SLA-management. In: Altmann, J., Buyya, R., Rana, O.F. (eds.) Grid Economics and Business Models, pp. 60–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03864-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Czepa, C., Tran, H., Zdun, U., Tran, T.T.K., Weiss, E., Ruhsam, C.: Ontology-based behavioral constraint authoring. In: 2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW). http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/4754/

  7. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Emeakaroha, V.C., Brandic, I., Maurer, M., Dustdar, S.: Low level metrics to high level SLAs - LoM2HiS framework: bridging the gap between monitored metrics and SLA parameters in cloud environments. In: 2010 International Conference on High Performance Computing Simulation, pp. 48–54, June 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCS.2010.5547150

  9. Gómez-López, M.T., Parody, L., Gasca, R.M., Rinderle-Ma, S., et al.: Prognosing the compliance of declarative business processes using event trace robustness. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2014 Conferences, pp. 327–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45563-0_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutiérrez, A.M., Cassales Marquezan, C., Resinas, M., Metzger, A., Ruiz-Cortés, A., Pohl, K.: Extending WS-agreement to support automated conformity check on transport and logistics service agreements. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 567–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45005-1_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, T.T.T., Ruhsam, C., Pucher, M.J., Kobler, M., Mendling, J.: Towards a pattern recognition approach for transferring knowledge in ACM. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops and Demonstrations, EDOCW 2014, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 134–138. IEEE Computer Society (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2014.28

  12. Kim, T.T.T., Weiss, E., Ruhsam, C., Czepa, C., Tran, H., Zdun, U.: Enabling flexibility of business processes using compliance rules: the case of mobiliar. In: vom Brocke, J., Mendling, J. (eds.) Business Process Management Cases. Management for Professionals, pp. 91–109. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58307-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. López, H.A., Debois, S., Hildebrandt, T.T., Marquard, M.: The process highlighter: from texts to declarative processes and back. In: Proceedings of the Dissertation Award, Demonstration, and Industrial Track at BPM 2018, Sydney, Australia, 9–14 September 2018, pp. 66–70 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marquezan, C.C., Metzger, A., Franklin, R., Pohl, K.: Runtime management of multi-level SLAs for transport and logistics services. In: Franch, X., Ghose, A.K., Lewis, G.A., Bhiri, S. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing, pp. 560–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45391-9_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin, J.: The Great Transition: Using the Seven Disciplines of Enterprise Engineering to Align People, Technology, and Strategy. Oxford Early Christian Studies, AMACOM (1995). https://books.google.at/books?id=fFJ4QgAACAAJ

  16. Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Swenson, K.D.: Adaptive case management: overview and research challenges. In: 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics, pp. 264–269, July 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2013.44

  17. Open Group: Value Streams. Technical report, The Open Group Architecture Forum Business Architecture Work Stream, January 2017. https://publications.opengroup.org/g170

  18. Papyrus Converse ACM Platform. https://www.isis-papyrus.com/e15/pages/business-apps/papyrus-converse.html. Accessed 21 May 2019

  19. Ross Jr., R.G.: Business Rule Concepts. Business Rule Solutions, Incorporated (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swenson, K.D.: Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way that Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2010). http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcatorgall&q=9780929652122

  21. Tran, T., et al.: An ontology-based approach for defining compliance rules by knowledge workers in adaptive case management. In: 5th International Workshop on Adaptive Case Management and Other Non-workflow Approaches to BPM (AdaptiveCM 2016), 20th IEEE International Enterprise Computing Workshops (EDOCW 2016), September 2016. http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/4753/

  22. Tran, T., Weiss, E., Ruhsam, C., Czepa, C., Tran, H., Zdun, U.: Embracing process compliance and flexibility through behavioral consistency checking in ACM: a repair service management case. In: 4th International Workshop on Adaptive Case Management and Other Non-workflow Approaches to BPM (AdaptiveCM 2015), Business Process Management Workshops 2015, August 2015. http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/4409/

  23. Tran, T., Weiss, E., Ruhsam, C., Czepa, C., Tran, H., Zdun, U.: Enabling flexibility of business processes by compliance rules: a case study from the insurance industry. In: 13th International Conference on Business Process Management 2015, Industry Track, August 2015. http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/4399/

  24. Tran, T.T.K., Pucher, M.J., Mendling, J., Ruhsam, C.: Setup and maintenance factors of ACM systems. In: Demey, Y.T., Panetto, H. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops, pp. 172–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41033-8_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) within project BIMSavesEnergy (grant agreement number 861710) where ISIS Papyrus delivers the business architecture enhanced ACM methodology and CES and AIT the construction industry and energy domain-specific aspects, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Manuel Gutiérrez Fernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gutiérrez Fernández, A.M. et al. (2019). Applying Business Architecture Principles with Domain-Specific Ontology for ACM Modelling: A Building Construction Project Example. In: Di Francescomarino, C., Dijkman, R., Zdun, U. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 362. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37453-2_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37452-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37453-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics