Skip to main content

Comparing Sensors for Feature Extraction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of UASG 2019 (UASG 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 51))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 636 Accesses

Abstract

The extraction of features from coarse resolution satellite imagery is reliable for regional scale of the area, primarily, and applicable to a relatively smaller area to some extent. Very high-resolution (VHR) satellite imagery from space borne data is useful for small-scale regions. However, the price is very costly and depends on the cloud cover. The data required during the rainy season for flood studies cannot be used at all. On the other hand, aerial borne data is emerging to replace the space borne data due to easier accessibility, availability and also for a better resolution. The conventional methods to extract features itself have challenges and limitations due to pixel-based classification. The high spectral variability within classes reduces the accuracy of VHR image in pixel-based classification. Therefore, we used the object-based image analysis (OBIA) techniques in the study for overcoming such conventional difficulties. In order to compare the classification with a different source of data throughout the study, we have demonstrated the comparison of image classification using different sources of data for feature extraction. In this study, we used Unarmed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) data of Chingrajpara slum area in the state of Chhattisgarh, India having various morphological features. Firstly, we segmented the images of the study area to enhance the classification accuracy to compare with the results of space borne data of Mumbai slum area in the state of Maharashtra, India. We applied in different source of data to extract the features of formal buildings, vegetation, roads and informal settlements subjected to the availability of features in the subset. The result of the classification using UAV data is comparatively better and getting more than 90% accuracy as compared to the accuracy results of space borne data. Since the accuracy has been depending upon location-specific, the sensors having better classification accuracy can be suggested for further classification having same specified features in other locations. Furthermore, the results can be used for monitoring and rapid digitization purposes in digital repository and for disaster risk reduction, especially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UNISDR (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. Sendai, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  2. NIDM (2013) National workshop on Uttarakhand disaster 2013: lessons learnt

    Google Scholar 

  3. NIDM (2014) Toolkit for urban planning in disaster management. New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandez Galarreta J (2014) Urban structural damage assessment using object-oriented analysis and semantic reasoning. ITC—Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xue J, Su B (2017) Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications. J Sens 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feng Q, Liu J, Gong J (2015) UAV remote sensing for urban vegetation mapping using random forest and texture analysis. Remote Sens 7(1):1074–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martha TR, Kerle N, van Westen CJ, Jetten V, Kumar KV (2011) Segment optimization and data-driven thresholding for knowledge-based landslide detection by object-based image analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 49(12):4928–4943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ardila JP, Bijker W, Tolpekin VA, Stein A (2012) Context-sensitive extraction of tree crown objects in urban areas using VHR satellite images. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 15:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kohli D, Warwadekar P, Kerle N, Sliuzas R, Stein A (2013) Transferability of object-oriented image analysis methods for slum identification. Remote Sens 5(9):4209–4228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Naorem V, Kuffer M, Verplanke J, Kohli D (2016) Robustness of rule sets using VHR imagery to detect informal settlements—a case of Mumbai, India. In: GEOBIA 2016: solutions and synergies

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jain K (2019) Urban slum dataset for Chingrajpara slum area. Chhattisgarh

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schelfaut K, Pannemans B, van der Craats I, Krywkow J, Mysiak J, Cools J (2011) Bringing flood resilience into practice: the FREEMAN project. Environ Sci Policy 14(7):825–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidelsohn K, Voss M, Krüger D (2018) Urban disaster resilience and security. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ajibade I, McBean G, Bezner-Kerr R (2013) Urban flooding in Lagos, Nigeria: patterns of vulnerability and resilience among women. Glob Environ Change 23(6):1714–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Etinay N, Egbu C, Murray V (2018) Building urban resilience for disaster risk management and disaster risk reduction. Procedia Eng 212(2017):575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Witt E, Lill I (2018) Methodologies of contemporary disaster resilience research. Procedia Eng 212:970–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to especially thank research scholars from the Geomatics Department for their support and valuable inputs. We also acknowledge Dr. Kamal Jain for providing UAV data in this paper. Last but not the least, we would also like to thank Computer Lab, CoEDMM, IIT Roorkee for enabling us to perform the analysis for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vickyson Naorem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Naorem, V., Jain, K., Mukherjee, M., Abhishek, K. (2020). Comparing Sensors for Feature Extraction. In: Jain, K., Khoshelham, K., Zhu, X., Tiwari, A. (eds) Proceedings of UASG 2019. UASG 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37393-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37393-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37392-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37393-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics