Abstract
Nowadays, many organizations or groups of persons must carry out group work effectively. Groupware typically provides a shared workspace, which is displayed through shared user interfaces by group members, with appropriate resources to accomplish a common task. Consequently, an adequate design and development of groupware requires that the shared user interfaces offer a high level of usability for the users’ interaction and the utilization of the shared resources. In this paper, a groupware usability evaluation methodology, specifically for the shared user interfaces, is proposed. This methodology provides an evaluation instrument that collects the users’ perceptions through four dimensions—effectiveness, efficiency, learnability and satisfaction—In addition, the gap theory of quality service, and a fuzzy linguistic approach using aggregation operators—which operate directly with words—are applied. Accordingly, the methodology shows to be a significant, innovative contribution to the research area on groupware usability evaluation. A case study to validate methodology, is presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ellis, C.A., Gibs, S.J., Rein, G.L.: Groupware: some issues and experiences. Commun. ACM 34–1, 39–58 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1145/99977.99987
Pearrow, M.: Web Site Usability Handbook. Charles River Media, Rockland (2000)
Anzures-García, M., Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Hornos, M., Paderewski, P.: Facilitating the development of collaborative applications with the MVC architectural pattern. In: Chapter 15, Software Engineering: Methods, Modeling, and Teaching, vol. 4, pp. 268–290 (2017)
International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee of Ergonomics. 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO No. 9241–11)
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge, Mass (1993)
Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53, 789–817 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007
Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Fernández-Luna, J.M.: A usability evaluation methodology of digital library. In: The Seventh International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management (eKNOW 2015), Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 22–27 (2015)
Baker, K., Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C.: Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In: CSCW 2002, pp. 96–105 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/587078.587093
Nielsen, J., Robert, L.M.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/259963.260531
Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation user interfaces. In: CHI, pp. 249–256. ACM (1990). https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
Nielsen, J.: Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In: CHI 1992, pp. 372–380. ACM (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142834
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: Groupware walkthrough: adding context to groupware usability evaluation. In: CHI 2002, pp. 455–462. ACM Press (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503458
Polson, P., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., Wharton, C.: Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 36, 741–773 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N
Antunes, P., Ferreira, A., Pino, J.A.: Analyzing shared workspaces design with human-performance models. In: Dimitriadis, Y.A., Zigurs, I., Gómez-Sánchez, E. (eds.) CRIWG 2006. LNCS, vol. 4154, pp. 62–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11853862_6
Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Comm. ACM 23–7, 396–410 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1145/358886.358895
Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., Andersen, H.: Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: CSCW 1994, pp. 429–439. ACM Press (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193065
Haynes, S., Purao, S., Skattebo, A.: Situating evaluation in scenarios of use. In: CSCW 2004, pp. 92–101. ACM Press (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031624
Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, New York (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.1996.544582
Vizcaíno, A., Martinez, M., Aranda, G., Piattini, M.: Evaluating collaborative applications from a knowledge management approach. In: WETICE 2005, pp. 221–225. IEEE (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/wetice.2005.36
Van der Veer, G., van Welie, M.: Task based groupware design: putting theory into practice. In: DIS20000: Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems, New York City, New York, USA, pp. 326–337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347781
Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10–4, 281–311 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/966930.966932
Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: The mechanics of collaboration: developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces. In: WETICE 2000, pp. 98–103. IEEE (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/enabl.2000.883711
Antunes, P., Costa, C.J.: Perceived value: a low-cost approach to evaluate meetingware. In: Favela, J., Decouchant, D. (eds.) CRIWG 2003. LNCS, vol. 2806, pp. 109–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_10
Huis in’t Veld, M., Andriessen, J., Verburg, R.: E-magine: the development of an evaluation method to assess groupware applications. In: WETICE 2003, pp. 153–164 (2003)
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 64, 12–40 (1988)
Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 79, 175–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00162-X
Heradio, R., Cabrerizo, F.J., Fernández-Amorós, D., Herrera, M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of library 2.0 functionalities. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 33, 642–654 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.04.001
Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part III. Inf. Sciences 9–1, 43–80 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
Anzures-García, M., Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Hornos, M.J., Paderewski, P.: A workflow ontology to support knowledge management in a group’s organizational structure. Int. J. Comp. Sci. Appl. 22–1, 163–178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-22-1-2781
Anzures-García, M., Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Hornos, M.J., Paderewski, P.: Tutorial function groupware based on a workflow ontology and a directed acyclic graph. IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 16–1, 294–300 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2018.8291487
Bojórquez, A., López, L., Hernández, M.E., Jiménez, E.: Utilización del alfa de Cronbach para validar la confiabilidad de un instrumento de medición de satisfacción del estudiante en el uso del software Minitab. In: Innovation in Engineering, Technological and Ed. for Competitiveness and Prosperity, pp. 14–16 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Anzures-García, M. (2019). A Groupware Usability-Oriented Evaluation Methodology Based on a Fuzzy Linguistic Approach. In: Ruiz, P., Agredo-Delgado, V. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCI-COLLAB 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1114. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37386-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37386-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37385-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37386-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)