Skip to main content

A Groupware Usability-Oriented Evaluation Methodology Based on a Fuzzy Linguistic Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI-COLLAB 2019)

Abstract

Nowadays, many organizations or groups of persons must carry out group work effectively. Groupware typically provides a shared workspace, which is displayed through shared user interfaces by group members, with appropriate resources to accomplish a common task. Consequently, an adequate design and development of groupware requires that the shared user interfaces offer a high level of usability for the users’ interaction and the utilization of the shared resources. In this paper, a groupware usability evaluation methodology, specifically for the shared user interfaces, is proposed. This methodology provides an evaluation instrument that collects the users’ perceptions through four dimensions—effectiveness, efficiency, learnability and satisfaction—In addition, the gap theory of quality service, and a fuzzy linguistic approach using aggregation operators—which operate directly with words—are applied. Accordingly, the methodology shows to be a significant, innovative contribution to the research area on groupware usability evaluation. A case study to validate methodology, is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ellis, C.A., Gibs, S.J., Rein, G.L.: Groupware: some issues and experiences. Commun. ACM 34–1, 39–58 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1145/99977.99987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearrow, M.: Web Site Usability Handbook. Charles River Media, Rockland (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anzures-García, M., Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Hornos, M., Paderewski, P.: Facilitating the development of collaborative applications with the MVC architectural pattern. In: Chapter 15, Software Engineering: Methods, Modeling, and Teaching, vol. 4, pp. 268–290 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee of Ergonomics. 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO No. 9241–11)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge, Mass (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability evaluation methods for the web: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53, 789–817 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Fernández-Luna, J.M.: A usability evaluation methodology of digital library. In: The Seventh International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management (eKNOW 2015), Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 22–27 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, K., Greenberg, S., Gutwin, C.: Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In: CSCW 2002, pp. 96–105 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/587078.587093

  9. Nielsen, J., Robert, L.M.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/259963.260531

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation user interfaces. In: CHI, pp. 249–256. ACM (1990). https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281

  11. Nielsen, J.: Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In: CHI 1992, pp. 372–380. ACM (1992). https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142834

  12. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: Groupware walkthrough: adding context to groupware usability evaluation. In: CHI 2002, pp. 455–462. ACM Press (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503458

  13. Polson, P., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., Wharton, C.: Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 36, 741–773 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Antunes, P., Ferreira, A., Pino, J.A.: Analyzing shared workspaces design with human-performance models. In: Dimitriadis, Y.A., Zigurs, I., Gómez-Sánchez, E. (eds.) CRIWG 2006. LNCS, vol. 4154, pp. 62–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11853862_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Comm. ACM 23–7, 396–410 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1145/358886.358895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., Andersen, H.: Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: CSCW 1994, pp. 429–439. ACM Press (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193065

  17. Haynes, S., Purao, S., Skattebo, A.: Situating evaluation in scenarios of use. In: CSCW 2004, pp. 92–101. ACM Press (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031624

  18. Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, New York (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.1996.544582

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Vizcaíno, A., Martinez, M., Aranda, G., Piattini, M.: Evaluating collaborative applications from a knowledge management approach. In: WETICE 2005, pp. 221–225. IEEE (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/wetice.2005.36

  20. Van der Veer, G., van Welie, M.: Task based groupware design: putting theory into practice. In: DIS20000: Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems, New York City, New York, USA, pp. 326–337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347781

  21. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10–4, 281–311 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/966930.966932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: The mechanics of collaboration: developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces. In: WETICE 2000, pp. 98–103. IEEE (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/enabl.2000.883711

  24. Antunes, P., Costa, C.J.: Perceived value: a low-cost approach to evaluate meetingware. In: Favela, J., Decouchant, D. (eds.) CRIWG 2003. LNCS, vol. 2806, pp. 109–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Huis in’t Veld, M., Andriessen, J., Verburg, R.: E-magine: the development of an evaluation method to assess groupware applications. In: WETICE 2003, pp. 153–164 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 64, 12–40 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 79, 175–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00162-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Heradio, R., Cabrerizo, F.J., Fernández-Amorós, D., Herrera, M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of library 2.0 functionalities. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 33, 642–654 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part III. Inf. Sciences 9–1, 43–80 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Anzures-García, M., Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Hornos, M.J., Paderewski, P.: A workflow ontology to support knowledge management in a group’s organizational structure. Int. J. Comp. Sci. Appl. 22–1, 163–178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-22-1-2781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Anzures-García, M., Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Hornos, M.J., Paderewski, P.: Tutorial function groupware based on a workflow ontology and a directed acyclic graph. IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 16–1, 294–300 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2018.8291487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bojórquez, A., López, L., Hernández, M.E., Jiménez, E.: Utilización del alfa de Cronbach para validar la confiabilidad de un instrumento de medición de satisfacción del estudiante en el uso del software Minitab. In: Innovation in Engineering, Technological and Ed. for Competitiveness and Prosperity, pp. 14–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luz A. Sánchez-Gálvez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sánchez-Gálvez, L.A., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Anzures-García, M. (2019). A Groupware Usability-Oriented Evaluation Methodology Based on a Fuzzy Linguistic Approach. In: Ruiz, P., Agredo-Delgado, V. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCI-COLLAB 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1114. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37386-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37386-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37385-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37386-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics