Skip to main content

The Entity Name Identification in Classification Algorithm: Testing the Advocacy Coalition Framework by Document Analysis (The Case of Russian Civil Society Policy)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1020 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11832))

Abstract

We present a methodology for identification and classification of policy actors. We used network analysis and rule-based named entity recognition on a computational cluster for actor identification, and Chinese whispers algorithm with pre-specified clusters to identify probable coalitions between the identified actors. We test this methodology on the case of Russian policy towards civil society. The theory we have chosen is the Advocacy Coalition Framework, which is a public policy theory aimed at explaining the long-term policy change by understanding how and why people engage in policy-making. One of the key ideas of the theory is that people participate in policy to translate their beliefs into action, and then gather into advocacy coalitions based on the shared “beliefs system.” Identification of actors is one of the most fundamental issues in political science, as it is often the first step in the research process. Another problem of interest is the classification of the actors based on latent characteristics such as shared beliefs. Most of research papers apply qualitative methodology for both of the steps. By applying our methodology, which relies heavily on the quantitative approach, we identify two coalitions – the conformist and the alternative. The leading actors in each coalition correspond with qualitative research in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lasswell, H.: The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sci. 1(1), 3–14 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodin, R., Moran, M., Rein, M.: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. The Oxford Handbooks of Political Science, vol. 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sabatier, P.: An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci. 2–3(21), 129–168 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sabatier, P., Jenkins-Smith, H.: Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. J. Pub. Policy 2(14), 175–203 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dahl, R.: Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. Yale University Press, New Haven (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sabatier, P., Weible, C.: The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier, P.A. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process, pp. 189–223. Westview Press, Boulder (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zaytsev, D.: Fluctuating capacity of policy advice in Russia: testing theory in developing country context. Policy Stud., 1–21 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pierce, J., Hicks, K., Giordono, L., Peterson, H.: Common approaches for studying the advocacy coalition framework: review of methods and exemplary practices. In: European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Oslo, Norway (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weible, C., Sabatier, P., McQueen, K.: Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Stud. J. 37, 121–140 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henry, L., Sundstrom, L.M.: Introduction. In: Evans Jr., A.B., et al. (eds.) Russian Civil Society: A Critical Assessment, pp. 3–10. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crotty, J., Hall, S.M., Ljubownikow, S.: Post-soviet civil society development in the Russian Federation: the impact of the NGO law. Eur. Asia Stud. 66(8), 1253–1269 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson, S.: Civil society in Russia: state-society relations in the post-Yeltsin era. Probl. Post-Communism 58(3), 11–27 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sungurov, A.: The models of interaction of the strcutres of civil society and authorities: Russian experience. Modernizatsia ekonomiki i globalisatzia 3, 500–508 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Way, L.: The real causes of the color revolutions. J. Democracy 19(3), 55–69 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kakabadze, S., Zaytsev, D., Zvaigina, N., Karastelev, V.: Institute of civil participation: verification of the activities of subjects. POLIS. Polit. Res. 3, 88–108 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crotty, J.: Managing civil society: democratisation and the environmental movement in a Russian region. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 36(4), 489–508 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sungurov, A.: Civil society and its development in Russia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., Batagelj, V.: Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software, vol. 46. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Biemann, C.: Chinese whispers: an efficient graph clustering algorithm and its application to natural language processing problems. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing, pp. 73–80. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hagberg, A., Swart, P., Chult, D.S.: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Centrality and prestige. In: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences), pp. 169–219. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478.006

  22. The representative of sex minorities is pleased with the meeting with Lukin (2009). Interfax. http://www.interfax.ru/society/news.asp?id=90683

Download references

Acknowledgment

The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100.’

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikita Talovsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zaytsev, D., Talovsky, N., Kuskova, V., Khvatsky, G. (2019). The Entity Name Identification in Classification Algorithm: Testing the Advocacy Coalition Framework by Document Analysis (The Case of Russian Civil Society Policy). In: van der Aalst, W., et al. Analysis of Images, Social Networks and Texts. AIST 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11832. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37334-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37334-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37333-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37334-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics