Abstract
During development, children form beliefs or mindsets about their intelligence and ability. Those who believe that ability or intelligence is something a person is born with and that it cannot be changed have an entity theory of intelligence or fixed mindset. Those who believe intelligence and ability are malleable and can change over time are said to have an incremental theory of intelligence or growth mindset. These mindsets impact how children perceive learning, how they face challenges, and how they deal with success and failure. Children with a growth mindset believe that they can change their intelligence or ability through hard work, practice, effort, and using the right strategies. In this chapter, we will focus on students’ beliefs about their intelligence, ability, and effort and how to intervene to promote a growth mindset in order to increase student engagement, particularly cognitive engagement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.
Aronson, J., Cohen, G., McColskey, W., & Montrosse, B. (2009). Reducing stereotype threat in classrooms: A review of social-psychological intervention studies on improving the achievement of Black students. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy enhancing and suppressing teaching behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 261–278.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Brooks, R., Brooks, S., Goldstein, S. (2012). The power of mindsets: Nurturing engagement, motivation, and resilience in students. In Christenson, S. L., Reschly Army L., & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 541–562). New York, NY: Springer.
Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 8664–8668.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
Elliot, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662.
Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33 52.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.
Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mindset interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793.
Schmidt, J. A., Shumow, L., & Kackar-Cam, H. Z. (2015). Teacher effects in outcomes of a growth mindset intervention in seventh grade science classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(2), 17–32.
Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., Pollard, E., & Romey, E. (2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 92–101.
Zeng, G., Hou, H., & Peng, K. (2016). Effect of growth mindset on school engagement and psychological well-being of Chinese primary and middle school students: The mediating role of resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1873.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pohl, A.J., Nelson, J.A.G. (2020). Promoting Growth Mindset to Foster Cognitive Engagement. In: Reschly, A.L., Pohl, A.J., Christenson, S.L. (eds) Student Engagement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37284-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37285-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)