Skip to main content

A Content-Agnostic Praxis for Transdisciplinary Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Technology Beyond Content

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe a novel transdisciplinary undergraduate program that is focused on developing students’ praxis to address problems across disciplinary boundaries and provide a means to interrogate discipline-specific content, epistemologies, and research methodologies they might encounter across those spaces. We argue that undergraduate educators have the potential to inculcate students’ praxis to effect social innovation across disciplinary boundaries by facilitating engagement with three interrelated processes: habits of mind, ways of knowing, and the adoption of a transdisciplinary, content-agnostic skillset. We describe each set of processes, along with core transdisciplinary skills and ways of knowing, building towards a content-agnostic instructional design approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashby, I., Exer, M., & Varner, D. (2020). Developing cross-cutting competencies for a transdisciplinary world: An extension of Bloom’s Taxonomy. In B. Hokanson et al. (Eds.), Educational technology beyond content: A new focus for learning. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, I., Exter, M., Matei, S., & Evans, J. (2016). Lifelong learning starts at school: Competency-based badge systems within the transdisciplinary experience at Purdue Polytechnic. In L. Muilenburg & Z. Berge (Eds.), Digital badges in education: Trends, issues, and cases. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exter, M., Ashby, I., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Using digital badges in competency-based degree programs. Invited Presentation for ACODE workshop, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exter, M., Caskurlu, S., Ashby, I., & Dionne, R. (2016). Designing and assessing competencies in a new transdisciplinary studies in technology program. 2016 International AECT Conference, Las Vegas, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exter, M., Dionne, R., & Lukasik, C. (2015). Design of a learner-centered seminar-/studio-based polytechnic institute. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology (pp. 139–154). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16504-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Exter, M. E., Ashby, I., Gray, C. M., Wilder, D., & Krause, T. (2017, June). Systematically integrating liberal education in a transdisciplinary design studio environment. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/28901

  • Freire, P. (1970/2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M. (2013). Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 12(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.12.2.195_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M., El Debs, L. D., Exter, M., & Krause, T. S. (2016, June). Instructional strategies for incorporating empathy in transdisciplinary technology education. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Engineering Ethics Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25746

  • Gray, C. M., Exter, M. E., & Krause, T. (2017, June). Moving towards individual competence from group work in transdisciplinary education. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Design in Engineering Education Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/28691

  • Gray, C. M., & Fernandez, T. M. (2018). When world(view)s collide: Contested epistemologies and ontologies in transdisciplinary education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2B), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen, I., Battarbee, K., & Mattelmäki, T. (2003). Empathic design, user experience in product design. Helsinki, Finland: IT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Purdue Polytechnic. (2018). Transdisciplinary studies in technology. Retrieved September 7, 2018 from https://polytechnic.purdue.edu/degrees/transdisciplinary-studies-technology

  • Rogers, Y. (2004). New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 87–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & McDonagh, D. (2013). Empathic design: Research strategies. Australasian Medical Journal, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2013.1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2016). Reflection and professional identity development in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9380-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Epps, A., Ashby, I., Gray, C. M., & Exter, M. (2016, June). Supporting student attainment and management of competencies in a transdisciplinary degree program. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Multidisciplinary Engineering Division. Washington, DC: ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25977

  • Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional way of being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, C., Terras, M., & Nyhan, J. (2012). Digital humanities in practice. London: Facet Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deena Varner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Varner, D., Gray, C.M., Exter, M.E. (2020). A Content-Agnostic Praxis for Transdisciplinary Education. In: Hokanson, B., Clinton, G., Tawfik, A.A., Grincewicz, A., Schmidt, M. (eds) Educational Technology Beyond Content. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37254-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37254-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37253-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37254-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics