Abstract
In this chapter the author attempts to show the feminist interpretation of various phenomena proper to security studies. She seeks to demonstrate that the presentation of security issues in political science is still dominated by the so-called male skew, which perceives the history of political violence as being “his,” not “her” story. The chapter highlights this issue by referring to armed conflicts and the problem of the resexualization of violence. Women are excluded, overlooked, and/or relegated to the role of passive security objects, most often as victims in this narrative. In criticizing this approach, the author calls for the use of the feminist lens. She also demonstrates gender specificity in the analysis of the security issues—and particularly of threats. She assumes than it can contribute to the development of studies on security and on political violence and thus, to increase the resilience of the state.
Security is a chimera
Greer (1970, p. 341)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
United Nations (1991). For contemporary statistics see the website of the United Nations High-Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), http://unhcr.gov. Accessed on 2 April 2018.
- 3.
“To make sense of today’s complex world, we need to understand that many decisions have not only gendered consequences but gendered causes—that is, causes flowing form presumptions or fears about femininity or masculinity” (Enloe 2007, p. 17).
References
Abu-Lughod, L. (2002). Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 783–790.
Addams, J., Balch, E. G., & Hamilton, A. (1916). Women at the Hague: The international congress of women and its results. New York: Macmillan.
Aggestam, K., Bergman-Rosamond, A., & Kronsell, A. (2019). Theorizing feminist foreign policy. International Relations, 33(1), 23–39.
Alison, M. (2004). Women as agents of political violence: Gendering security. Security Dialogue, 35(4), 437–463.
Alpern, S. B. (1998). Amazons of Black Sparta: The women warriors of Dahomey. New York: New York University Press.
Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1989). Introduction. In N. Yuval-Davis & F. Anthias (Eds.), J. Campling (consultant ed.), Woman—nation—state (pp. 1–15). London: Macmillan.
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.
Aristotle. (2002). Polityka (L. Piotrowicz, Trans. and Ed., K. Grzybowski, Foreword). Warsaw: De Agostini/Altaya.
Askin, K. D. (1999). Sexual violence in decisions and indictments of the Yugoslav and Rwandan tribunals: Current status. The American Journal of International Law, 93(1), 97–123.
Bachofen, J. J. (1897). Das Mutterrecht: Eine Untersuchung über die Gynaikokratie der alten Welt nach ihrer religiösen und rechtlichen Natur (2nd ed.). Basel: Schwabe.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.
Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (Eds.). (1994). Human aggression (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove: Books/Cole.
bell hooks [Watkins. G.]. (2013). Teoria feministyczna: od marginesu do centrum (E. Majewska, Trans.) (pp. 34–39). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej [Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, Pluto Press, 2nd edition, London 2000].
Berger, M. T., & Guidroz, K. (Eds.). (2009). The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy trough race, class and gender. Durgam, NC: University of North Carolina.
Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(3), 422–447.
Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon.
Brock-Utne, B. (1985). Educating for peace: A feminist perspective. New York: Pergamon Press.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will, men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Shuster.
Brownmiller, S. (1982). Wewnętrzny wróg. In T. Hołówka (Ed.), Nikt nie rodzi się kobietą (Selection, translation and introduction T. Hołówka) (p. 284). Warsaw: Czytelnik [fragment of “The Enemy Within”, in S. Stambler, ed., Women’s liberation blueprint for the future, Ace: New York 1970].
Bulbeck, C. (1998). Re-orienting western feminisms: Women’s diversity in a postcolonial world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burguieres, M. K. (1990). Feminist approaches to peace: Another step for peace studies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(1), 1–18.
Burton, R. F. (1996). Mission to Gelele, King of Dahomey. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Chant, S. (2008). The ‘feminization of poverty’ and the ‘feminization’ of anti-poverty programmes: Room for revision. Journal of Development Studies, 44(2), 165–197.
Chowdhry, G., & Nair, S. (Eds.). (2002). Power, postcolonialism and international relations: Reading race, gender and class. London: Routledge.
Cockburn, C. (2004). The continuum of violence: A gender perspective on war and peace. In W. Giles & J. Hyndman (Eds.), Sites of violence: Gender and conflict zones (pp. 24–44). Los Angeles: University of California.
Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Czaputowicz, J. (2012). Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe. Współczesne koncepcje. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
D’Amico, F. (1998). Feminist perspectives on women warriors. In L. A. Lorentzen & J. Turpin (Eds.), The women and war reader (pp. 119–125). New York: New York University Press.
Dabbs, J. M., & Morris, R. (1990). Testosterone, social class and antisocial behaviour in a sample of 4,462 men. Psychological Science, 1(3), 209–211.
De Pauw, L. G. (1998). Battle cries and lullabies: Women in war from prehistory to the present. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Derrida, J. (1980). La carte postale de Socrate à Freud et au-delà. Paris: Flammarion.
Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman hating. New York: Plume.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330.
Elshtain, J. B. (1987). Women and war. New York: Basic Books.
Engels, F. (1886). Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staates. Im Anschluss an L. H. Morgan’s Forschungen (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: J. H. W. Dietz.
Enloe, C. (1983). Does khaki become you? The militarization of women’s lives. Boston: South End Press.
Enloe, C. (2007). Globalization & militarism: Feminists make the link. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Falk, R., Kim, S. S., Mendlovitz, S. H., & Mcnemar, D. (1991). The United Nations and a just world order. Boulder: Westview Press.
Foucault, M. (1984). L’usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.
Frodi, A., Macaulay, J., & Thome, P. R. (1977). Are women always less aggressive than men? A review of the experimental literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 634–660.
Gasztold, A. (2017). A feminist approach to security studies. Przegląd Politologiczny, 3, 179–189.
Gasztold, A. (2018). Studia nad bezpieczeństwem w ujęciu feministycznym. Studia Politologiczne, 47, 316–333.
Gilligan, C. (1995). Moral orientation and moral development. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics (pp. 31–46). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Goldstein, J. S. (2001). War and gender: How gender shapes the war system and vice versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greer, G. (1970). The female eunuch. New York: Bantam Books.
Harding, S. (1986). The science questions in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hayden, R. M. (2000). Rape and rape avoidance in ethno-national conflicts: Sexual violence in liminalized states. American Anthropologist, 102(1), 27–41.
Hekman, S. J. (1990). Gender and knowledge: Elements of the postmodern feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hołówka, T. (1982). Intorduction. In T. Hołówka (Ed.), Nikt nie rodzi Kobietą się (Selection, translation and introduction T. Hołówka) (pp. 5–21). Warsaw: Czytelnik.
Humm, M. (1993). Słownik teorii feminizmu (B. Umińska & J. Mikos, Trans.). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.
Hyży, E. (2003). Kobieta, ciało, tożsamość: teorie podmiotu w filozofii feministycznej końca XX wieku. Cracow: Universitas.
Jones, A. (1996). Does the ‘gender’ make the world go round? Feminist critiques of international relations. Review of International Studies, 22(4), 405–425.
Jones, A. (2006). Genocide: A comprehensive introduction. New York: Routledge.
Lange, L. (2003). Woman is not a rational animal: On Aristotle’s biology of reproduction. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (2nd ed., pp. 1–15). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Lipsitz Bem, S. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lolber, J. (1992). In S. A. Farrell (Ed.), The social construction of gender. Newbury Park: Sage.
Loomba, A. (2005). Colonializm/postcolonialism. London: Routledge (1991).
Majchrzyk, Z. (2009). Kiedy kobieta zabija: motywy, osobowość, relacja sprawca-ofiara, strategie obronne. Opinia sądowo-psychologiczna stanu silnego wzburzenia. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
Malinowska, E. (Ed.). (2011). Społeczne konteksty i dylematy realizacji ról płciowych. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(3), 353–363.
McLeod, J. (2010). Beginning postcolonialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mead, M. (1949). Male and female: A study of the sexes in a changing world. New York: William Morrow.
Millett, K. (2005). Theory of sexual politics. In A. E. Cudd & R. O. Andreasen (Eds.), Feminist theory: A philosophical anthology (pp. 37–59). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Miluska, J. (1995). Przeksztatłcenia ról płciowych a szanse kobiet. In J. Miluska & E. Pakszys (Eds.), Humanistyka i Płeć I: Studia kobiece z psychologii, filozofii i historii (pp. 19–38). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Mitchell, J. (1974). Psychoanalysis and feminism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Moghadam, V. M. (2005). Peacebuilding and reconstruction with women: Reflections on Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine. Development, 48(3), 63–72.
Moghissi, H. (1991). Feminism and Islamic fundamentalism: The limits of postmodern analysis. London: Zed Books.
Moon, K. (1997). Sex among allies: Military prostitution in US-Korea relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.
Münkler, H. (2002). Die neuen Kriege. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag.
No authors. (2002, May). Licence to rape: The Burmese military regime’s use of sexual violence the ongoing war in Shan state. Chiang Mai: The Shan Human Rights Foundation, The Shan Women’s Action Network.
O’Reilly, M. (2018). Gender agency in war & peace—Gender justice and women’s activism in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ortner, S. B. (1974). Is female to male as ‘nature’ to ‘culture’? In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Women, culture and society (pp. 68–87). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pakszys, E. (1995). Płeć a rozwój nauki; problemy epistemologii feministycznej. In J. Miluska & E. Pakszys (Eds.), Studia kobiece z psychologii, filozofii i historii (pp. 85–98). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Peach, L. J. (1993). Women at war: The ethics of women in combat. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pedwell, C. (2010). Feminism, culture and embodied practice: The rhetorics of comparison. New York: Routledge.
Peterson, V. S., & Runyan, A. S. (1999). Global gender issues (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westviev.
Pettman, J. J. (1996). Worlding women: A feminist international politics. London: Routledge (e book 2005).
Pratt, M., & Werchick, L. (2004, March 18). Sexual terrorism: Rape as a weapon of war in eastern democratic Republic of Congo—An assessment of programmatic responses to sexual violence in North Kivu, South Kivu, Maniema, and Oriental Provinces. January 9–16, 2004 (USAID/DCHA Assessment Report). Retrieved April 2, 2018, from http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadk346.pdf
Prügl, E. (1999). The global construction of gender: Home-based work in the political economy of the 20th century. New York: Columbia University Press.
Razack, S. H. (2008). Casting out. The eviction of Muslims from western law & politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Reardon, B. (1985). Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers College Press.
Rich, A. C. (1990). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Societies, 5(4), 631–660.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. (2011). Retrieved November 8, 2018, from https://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/EA9AEFF7-5752-4F84-BE94-0A655EB30E16/0/Rome_Statute_English.pdf
Różalska, A. M. (2016). Feministki postkolonialne wobec wojny z terroryzmem po 11 września 2001 roku. In I. Desparak & I. Kuźma (Eds.), Kobiety niepokorne: reformatorki – buntowniczki – rewolucjonistki (pp. 139–150). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Ruddick, S. (1980). Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies, 6(2), 342–367.
Ruddick, S. (1989). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. New York: Ballantine Books.
Ruddick, S. (1998). ‘Woman of peace’. A feminist construction. In L. A. Lorentzen & J. Turpin (Eds.), The women and war reader (pp. 216–223). New York: New York University Press.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of battered women’s movement. Boston: South End Press.
Seifert, R. (1994). War and rape: A preliminary analysis. In A. Stiglmayer (Ed.), Mass rape: The war against women in Bosnia-Herzegovina (pp. 54–72). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Shepherd, L. J. (2010). Feminist security studies. In R. A. Denemark (Ed.), The international studies encyclopaedia. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell/Blackwell Reference Online.
Skjelsbæk, I. (1997). Gendered battlefields: A gender analysis of peace and conflict. PRIO Report 6/1997. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute (PRIO). Retrieved June 7, 2017, from https://www.prio.org/utility/DownloadFile.ashx?id=478&type=publicationfile
Skjelsbæk, I. (2006). Victim and survivor: Narrated social identities of women who experienced rape during the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Feminism & Psychology, 16(4), 373–403.
Solanas, V. (1968). SCUM manifesto. New York: Olympia Press.
Stiehm, J. (1983). Women and men’s war. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Stump, J. L., & Dixit, P. (2013). Critical terrorism studies: An introduction to research methods. London: Routledge.
Sylvester, C. (1994). Feminist theory and international relations in a postmodern era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (1993, Autumn). Women’s culture and lesbian feminist activism: A reconsideration of cultural feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Societies, 19(1), 32–61.
Tickner, J. A. (1997a). You just don’t understand: Troubled engagements between feminists and IR theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632.
Tickner, J. A. (1997b). Re-visioning security. In K. Booth & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theory today (pp. 175–197). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Tickner, J. A., & Sjoberg, L. (2007). Feminism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & P. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (pp. 185–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tiger, L. (1969). Men in groups. London: Nelson.
Tripp, A. M. (2002). Challenges in transnational feminist mobilization. In M. Marx-Ferree & A. M. Tripp (Eds.), Global feminism: Transnational women’s activism, organizing and human rights (pp. 296–312). New York: New York University Press.
United Nations. (1991). The world’s women: Trends and statistics 1970–1990. New York: United Nations.
United Nations. (2017). The feminization of poverty, UN women. New York. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/followup/session/presskit/fs1.htm
Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18(1), 19–23.
Walt, S. M. (1991). The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 219–239.
Wharton, A. P. (2007). The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research. Oxford: Willey.
Whitworth, S. (2005). Militarized masculinities and the politics of peacekeeping. In K. Booth (Ed.), Critical security studies and world politics (pp. 89–109). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Wibben, A. T. R. (2011). Feminist security studies: A narrative approach. London: Routledge.
Young, I. M. (2003). The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29(1), 1–25.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gasztold, A. (2020). Feminism and the Question of Security. In: Feminist Perspectives on Terrorism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37234-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37234-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37233-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37234-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)