Skip to main content

Stand-Up Comedy and Mental Health: Critiquing the Troubled Stand-Up Stereotype

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dark Side of Stand-Up Comedy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Comedy ((PSCOM))

Abstract

In “Stand-Up Comedy and Mental Health: Critiquing the Troubled Stand-Up Stereotype,” philosopher and amateur stand-up comedian Sheila Lintott analyzes the nature and critically evaluates the evidence for the stereotype that stand-up comedians are an extraordinarily troubled lot, arguing that the evidence does not support the truth of the stereotype. In addition, this chapter explores the roots of the stereotype in the mad genius stereotype familiar since at least the time of Plato; considers reasons for its perpetuation among the public, academia, and stand-ups themselves; and surveys the negative consequences of the troubled stand-up stereotype, including a tendency to downplay the role the working conditions, climate, and culture of stand-up comedy plays in creating or exacerbating any mental health, social, and addiction challenges faced by comedians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It’s also worth noting that a larger cultural debate over education, namely, over what and who should educate the youth, was at play. Plato was engaged, that is, in a debate over curriculum: should education be delivered by artists focused on art, for example, Ion on the writings of Homer, or by philosophers on philosophy, for example, well, the teachings of Socrates and Plato? Although remnants of this debate are played out today, the stakes for philosophers are lower because the terms are different—the question, in the United States at least, is whether the arts should be included in education and philosophy as central to education isn’t even on the table.

References

Download references

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank the editors of this volume, Eric Shouse and Patrice Oppliger, for their encouragement, assistance, support, and extraordinary patience throughout the development of this manuscript. I am also grateful to Monica Lintott for generously reading and providing feedback and suggestions on an earlier version and to the audience at the Art, Aesthetics, and Medical and Health Humanities Conference at University of Kent, February 2020, especially Stella Bolaki, for lively discussion and novel insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheila Lintott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lintott, S. (2020). Stand-Up Comedy and Mental Health: Critiquing the Troubled Stand-Up Stereotype. In: Oppliger, P.A., Shouse, E. (eds) The Dark Side of Stand-Up Comedy. Palgrave Studies in Comedy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37214-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics