Skip to main content
  • 471 Accesses

Abstract

Workers struggled to improve their working environments and to get better compensation. Employers and workers sometimes resorted to illegal and unethical activities, including threats of and actual violence. Large-scale employers enlisted their political allies to tilt the balance of power in their favor. Despite opposition, the rights of workers expanded during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Although not strictly illegal, using such political influence was certainly dubious. Union workers sometimes made their gains at the expense of non-union workers. Gains in wages were more likely attributable to increasing labor productivity than to union activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Carl Gersuny chronicles employee pilfering in New England textile mills (1976, 144–146).

  2. 2.

    Alan Trachtenberg reported “close to 37,000 strikes, involving 7 million workers on record between 1881 and 1905—provide dramatic indices of turmoil (Trachtenberg 1982, 80).”

  3. 3.

    Coal mine operators in other states had conspired to get railroads to charge higher rates to West Virginia operators (Wheeler 1976, 88).

  4. 4.

    Mother Mary Jones came to West Virginia during one of the strikes. She allegedly exhorted miners to, “Arm yourselves, return home and kill every goddamned mine guard on the creeks, blow up the mines, and drive the damned scabs out of the valley (Lee 1969, 27).” Howard Lee got this quote from a transcribed copy of Jones’ speech retained by the secretary of the West Virginia Coal Operators Association. Given that Ms. Jones’ name is now the title of an esteemed liberal periodical, one wonders how Mother Jones readership would react to knowing that she advocated armed violence with—guns.

  5. 5.

    The safety measures were, in effect, apportioned according to the party, who could better or more conveniently make the decision. Presumably, if transactions costs were low, using a Coasian argument regarding an initial assignment of property rights (or responsibility), an efficient level of safety would be chosen, regardless of whether miners or operators made safety decisions.

  6. 6.

    At one point, Carnegie was proud that he paid his men an average of $1.40 a day compared with the local average of $1.35. In 1898 he paid $13.5 million in wages and reputedly gained $11.5 million in profits (Standiford 2005, 240).

  7. 7.

    Companies issuing scrip often did so at full value; some miners sold their scrip to independent individuals, saloons, and storekeepers. Independent individuals often paid 65 to 85 percent of the face value and then turned around and bought provisions from the company store. Coal mine owners quickly prohibited such transactions (Fishback 1986, 1022).

  8. 8.

    Ford defended his assembly line system, denying that it took skill out of work (Hall 1998, 414; Seabright 2004, 158–59). Ford was blunt in his autobiography: “Without the most rigid discipline we would have the utmost confusion … . There is not much personal contact—the men do their work and go home—a factory is not a drawing room (Ford and Crowther 1923, 111–112).”

  9. 9.

    See Fairris (1995, 498) for arbitrary foremen; Nelson (1982, 335–357); second quote Douglas (1921, 89–107).

  10. 10.

    David Roediger and Philip Foner thought the shorter workday was simply camouflage for the real goal: cutting wages (1989, 245–248; Hunnicutt 1992, 478).

  11. 11.

    Government officials’ and social activists’ belief that they know better than do employers and business owners recurs. Proponents of the minimum wage often assert that employers will benefit from raising the minimum wage; such an argument leaves unanswered the obvious question, “If it is so beneficial, why don’t employers do so voluntarily?”

  12. 12.

    Because convict labor was not voluntary, employers exploiting such labor could be seen as acting unethically, even though their actions were legal. Rebecca McLennan documented how the American judicial system gave “official recognition and implicit approval” to involuntary servitude (McLennan 2008, 109–111, see also 8). The businessmen involved showed scant regard for the humanity under their control, and their ethical behavior surely ranked among the worst examples in modern business ethics (Blackmon 2009, 96, 327, 362–364; McLennan 2008, 122). De Beers Mining Company exploited native people in the gold and diamond fields (Newbury 1987, 17–18, 23).

  13. 13.

    In a sense, the argument is that such employers are exploiting their workers for the workers’ own good.

  14. 14.

    The rising earnings of American women suggest that the father’s earnings may prove to be less important to families in the future; whether fathers will spend their days wandering aimlessly remains to be seen.

  15. 15.

    McKendrick later took to task commentators unwilling to examine the available data, admittedly a difficult endeavor. He revealed his scorn in the memorable statement: “There is a kind of social history which will always dwell lovingly on cancer of the scrotum in climbing boy chimney sweeps, or exploit the quick reaction to stories of the rampant immorality of the mill-hands, of female workers stumbling home ‘blear eyed with drink and beastliness (McKendrick 1974, 170–171).’”

  16. 16.

    This point was made by Kathryn Edin and H. Luke Shaefer: “The decision makers rarely meet the rank and file….Only employers who know their employees personally can exercise the discretion to discern whether someone like Rae [fired for missing a shift, when her transportation proved unavailable], the two-time ‘cashier of the month,’ has missed her shift because she’s shirker or is a valued employee who has hit a rough patch (Edin and Shaefer, $2.00 a Day, 165).”

Bibliography

  • Abramovitz, Mimi. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present (Boston, MA: South End Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. “‘Company Stores’ in the Pennsylvania Mining Districts,” 7(1), January 1896, 162–164, no author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, William J. An Introduction to English Economic History and Theory. Part 1: The Middle Ages (New York, NY: Longmans, Green, 1913). 9th Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, Edward and Kim McQuaid, “Businessman and Bureaucrat: The Evolution of the American Social Welfare System, 1900–1940.” Journal of Economic History 38(1), March 1978, 120–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmon, Douglas. Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II (New York, NY: Anchor Books, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Francine and Lawrence Kahn. “Gender Differences in Pay.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4), Autumn 2000, 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, Glenn A. “Nesday Chemical Company.” Harvard Business Reports 4, 1927, 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, George. “What Did Unions Do in Nineteenth-Century Britain?” Journal of Economic History 48(2), June 1988, 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brozen, Yale. “The Effect of Statutory Minimum Wage Increases on Teen-Age Employment.” Journal of Law & Economics 12(1), April 1969, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Week. “A Big Fast-Growing Market: The Leisured Masses, Part I.” September 12, 1953, 142–143, 145–46, 148, 150, 152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, David and Alan Krueger. “Minimum Wages and Employment: a Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.” American Economic Review 84(4), September 1994, 772–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, Cheryl. “Employees Really Do Waste Time at Work.” Forbes. July 17, 2012. www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2012/07/17/employees-really-do-waste-time-at-work/, viewed January 9, 2016, 9:00am.

  • Cooper, Preston. “What the Card-Krueger Study Tells Us about the Minimum Wage.” Foundation for Economic Education. December 18, 2015. https://fee.org/articles/what-the-card-krueger-study-tells-us-about-the-minimum-wage/, viewed March 5, 2018, 10:25am.

  • Crofton, Stephanie, William Anderson, and Emily Rawe. “Do Higher Real Minimum Wages Lead to More High School Dropouts? Evidence from Maryland Across Races, 1993–2004.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 68(2), April 2009, 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Dorothy. A History of Shopping (London, UK: Routledge & Kegan, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Degler, Carl. At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicey, Albert. Lectures on the Relation between Law & Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century (London: Macmillan, 1914).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donskey, Jordann. “Time Theft: Top 7 Ways Employees Steal Time.” EPAY Systems. September 22, 2014. www.epaysystems.com/time-theft-top-7-ways-employees-steal-time.

  • Douglas, Paul. “Shop Committees: Substitute for, or Supplement to, Trades-Unions? Journal of Political Economy 29(2), February 1921, 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, Kathryn and J.H. Luke Shaefer. $2.00 a day: living on almost nothing in America (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century (New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Robert, Jr. “Evolution of the Japanese System of Employer-Employee Relations, 1868–1945.” Business History Review, XLIV(1), Spring 1970, 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairris, David. “From Exit to Voice in Shopfloor Governance: The Case of Company Unions.” Business History Review 69, Winter 1995, 493–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, Nicholas. The World the Railways Made (London: Pimlico, [1990] 1994]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishback, Price. “Did Coal Miners ‘Owe Their Souls to the Company Store’? Theory and Evidence from the Early 1900s.” Journal of Economic History 46(4), December 1986, 1011–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishback, Price. “The Irony of Reform: Did Large Employers Subvert Workplace Safety Reform, 1869 to 1930?” Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History, edited by Edward Glaeser and Claudia Goldin (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006), 285–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishback, Price and Dieter Lauszus, “The Quality of Services in Company Towns: Sanitation in Coal Towns during the 1920s.” Journal of Economic History 49(1), March 1989, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Henry and Samuel Crowther. My Life and Work (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Company, 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Megan. “Perks and Recreation: In Silicon Valley, a New Breed of Tech Company Tries to Enforce Fun.” The Atlantic, December 2012, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersuny, Carl. “‘A Devil in Petticoats’ and Just Cause: Patterns of Punishment in Two New England Textile Factories.’ Business History Review L(2), Summer 1976, 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, Claudia. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Brian. Morality and the Market Place (London, UK: Hodder and Stoughton, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter. Cities in Civilization (New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Havemann, Ernest. “The Emptiness of Too Much Leisure: Automation and a Shrinking Work Week Bring a Real Threat to All of Us.” Life, February 7, 1964, 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilkey, Judy. Character Is Capital: Success Manuals and Manhood in Gilded Age America (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffner, Joseph Cardinal. Economic Systems and Economic Ethics: Guidelines in Catholic Social Teachings (Cologne, Germany: Ordo Socialis, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, Stewart. The Story of American Railroads (New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunnicutt, Benjamin. “Kellogg’s Six-Hour Day: A Capitalist Vision of Liberation through Managed Work Reduction.” Business History Review 66(2), Summer 1992, 475–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Walter. The Decline of Pleasure (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank. “The Ethics of Competition.” The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays (New York, NY: Harper & Brothers, 1935). 41–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank. “Ethics and Economic Reform. I. The Ethics of Liberalism.” Economica 6(21), Feb. 1939, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovensky, Josh. “It’s Time to Pay Prisoners the Minimum Wage.” New Republic. August 14, 2014. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119083/prison-labor-equal-rights-wages-incarcerated-help-economy, viewed February 12, 2015.

  • Laurie, Bruce. Artisans into Workers: Labor in Nineteenth-Century America (New York, NY: Hill and Wang, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Howard. Bloodletting in Appalachia: The Story of West Virginia’s Four Major Mine Wars and Other Thrilling Incidents of Its Coal Fields (Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, Thomas. “Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4), Fall 2005, 207–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marens, Richard. “What comes around: the early 20th century American roots of legitimating corporate social responsibility.” Organization 20(3), 2013, 454–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, Eugene. “Social Welfare and Business: The Krupp Welfare Program, 1860–1914.” Business History Review XLII(1), Spring 1968, 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, Neil. “Home Demand and Economic Growth: A New View of the Role of Women and Children in the Industrial Revolution.” Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honour of J.H. Plumb, edited by Neil McKendrick (London, UK: Europa Publications, 1974), 152–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, Rebecca. The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, Wanda. Victorian Working Women: an Historical and Literary Study of Women in British Industries and Professions, 1832–1850 (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Daniel. “Company Union Movement, 1900–1937: A Reexamination.” Business History Review 61(3), Autumn 1982, 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbury, Colin. “Technology, Capital, and Consolidation: The Performance of DeBeers Mining Company Limited, 1880–1889.” Business History Review 61, Spring 1987, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, Willis. The Quest for a Living Wage: The History of the Federal Minimum Wage Program (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, William. A Democracy at War (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecci, Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum. 1891. vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersik, Tom. “The Economics of Inmate Labor Force Participation.” Executive Summary. The Center on Crime, Communities & Culture. September 2000. http://www.correction.org/Secondary%20Pages/InmateLabor.html.

  • Roediger, David and Philip Foner. Our Own Time: A History of American Labor and the Working Day (London, UK: Greenwood Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltsman, Michael. “Who Really Employs Minimum-Wage Workers?” Wall Street Journal, October 29, 2013, A13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecter, Anna. “Disabled workers paid just pennies an hour—and it’s legal.” NBC News. June 25, 2013, no page number. http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/25/19062348-disabled-workers-paid-just-pennies-an-hour-and-its-legal, viewed September 22, 2013.

  • Seabright, Paul. The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, Muriel. Cloud by Day: The Story of Coal and Coke and People (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, [1947] 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiells, Martha. “Collective Choice of Working Conditions: Hours in British and U.S. Iron and Steel, 1890–1923.” Journal of Economic History 50(2), June 1990, 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, David. From Hire to Liar: The Role of Deception in the Workplace (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner (Indianapolis, IN: LibertyClassics, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Standiford, Les. Meet You in Hell: Andrew Carnegie, Henry Clay Frick, and the Bitter Partnership that Transformed America (New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Art. “Time Theft Is a Bumpy Road for Employees.” Internal Auditor, February 5, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suffern, Arthur. Conciliation and Arbitration in the Coal Industry of America (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1915).

    Google Scholar 

  • Surdam, David. The Big Leagues Go to Washington: Congress and Sports Antitrust, 1951–1989 (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Time Well Scheduled. Time Theft in the Workplace. n.d. https://timewellscheduled.com/time-theft/.

  • Tooley, Heather. “Personal Internet Usage in the Workplace—A Serious Epidemic.” January 17, 2010, http://voices.yahoo.com/personal-internet-usage-workplace-serious-5284153html?cat=15, viewed June 12, 2013, 3:01pm.

  • Trachtenberg, Alan. The Incorporation of America: Culture and Society in the Gilded Age (New York, NY: Hill and Wang, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ure, Andrew. The Philosophy of Manufacturers: Or, An Exposition of the Scientific, Moral, and Commercial Economy of the Factory System of Great Britain (London, UK: Charles Knight, 1835).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Economic News Release.” 1996. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ebs.t0.5html.

  • Vaughan, Diane. The Challenger Launch Decision (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Nick. “American Samoa Minimum Wage Freeze Approved by Congress.” Huffington Post, July 19, 2012, www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/19/american-samoa-minimum-wage_n_1687975, viewed September 22, 2012.

  • Washington Times. “GOP hits Pelosi’s ‘hypocrisy’ on wage bill.” January 12, 2007, www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/jan/12/20070112-120720-2734r.

  • WBEZ91.5 “Labor laws allow workers with disabilities to earn less than minimum wage.” May 28, 2013. http://www.wbez.org/print/107389.

  • Whaples, Robert. “Winning the Eight-Hour Day, 1909–1919.” Journal of Economic History 50(2), June 1990, 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Hoyt. “Mountaineer Mine Wars: An Analysis of the West Virginia Mine Wars of 1912–13 and 1920–21.” Business History Review L(1), Spring 1976, 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David George Surdam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Surdam, D.G. (2020). Labor Resists. In: Business Ethics from the 19th Century to Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37169-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37169-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37168-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37169-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics