Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Improving Accessible Digital Practices in Higher Education pp 21–44Cite as

Higher Education, Information and Communication Technologies and Students with Disabilities: An Overview of the Current Situation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter provides context for the issues discussed throughout the book to justify why the issue of students with disabilities using technology to support their studies in higher education continues to be both important and problematic. To do this, the chapter: (1) reviews current statistics regarding enrollment and success of students with disabilities in higher education; (2) examines the role and prevailing use of information and communication technologies in higher education; (3) considers the potential of the next wave of new ICTs; (4) illuminates with examples the many good, bad and terrible practices related to ICTs experienced by students in higher education; and (5) discusses the implications for future research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This section is based on Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J., & Scapin, R. (2014). Digital technology, learning, and postsecondary students with disabilities: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(4), 369–379.

  2. 2.

    This section is based on Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., King, L., Barile, M., Havel, A., Mimouni, Z., Chauvin, A., Budd, J., Raymond, O., Juhel, J.-C., & Asuncion, J. (2013). Information and communication technology profiles of college students with learning disabilities and adequate and very poor readers. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 176–188.

  3. 3.

    http://www.adaptech.org

  4. 4.

    http://www.adaptech.org/en/downloads

  5. 5.

    Ed-ICT International Network Symposia. http://ed-ict.com/workshops/

References

  • Ableser, J., & Moore, C. (2018, September 10). Universal Design for Learning and digital accessibility: Compatible partners or a conflicted marriage? Educause Review. Resource document. EDUCAUSE. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/9/universal-design-for-learning-and-digital-accessibility-compatiblepartners-or-a-conflicted-marriage#fnr2

  • Achecker. (2011). Web accessibility checker. https://achecker.ca/checker/index.php. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.

  • Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 higher education edition. Resource document. The New Media Consortium. http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf

  • Advance HE. (2018, September). Equality and higher education: Students statistical report 2018. Resource document. Advance HE. https://www.ecu.ac.uk/publications/equality-higher-education-statistical-report-2018/

  • Alahmadi, T., & Drew, S. (2017). Accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university websites in world, Oceania, and Arab categories for home, admission, and course description webpages. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 21(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., et al. (2019). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 higher education edition. Resource document. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf?la=en&hash=C8E8D444AF372E705FA1BF9D4FF0DD4CC6F0FDD1

  • Arim, R. (2017, February 15). A profile of persons with disabilities among Canadians aged 15 years or older, 2012. Resource document. Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 89-654-X. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2015001-eng.pdf

  • Asuncion, J. V., Budd, J., Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., Barile, M., & Amsel, R. (2012). Social media use by students with disabilities. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 16(1), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D. (2008, March). Digital does not equal accessible. Presentation for NERCOMP (EDUCAUSE), Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. D., Weinberg, L. A., & Brodwin, M. G. (2015). Universal design for learning and instruction: Perspectives of students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptionality Education International, 25(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. C., & Pomerantz, J. (2017, October). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2017. Resource document. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2017/10/studentitstudy2017.pdf

  • Burgstahler, S. (2015). Universal design of instruction: From principles to practice. In S. E. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (2nd ed., pp. 31–64). Boston: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, A. P., & Desrochers, D. M. (2003). Preparing students for the knowledge economy: What school counselors need to know [special issue]. Professional School Counseling, 6(4), 228–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. Resource document. CAST. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

  • Chmilar, L., & Anton, C. (2018). Mobile learning: Device ownership, usage, and perspectives of post-secondary students with and without disabilities. The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, 6, 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Concordia University Student Hub. (n.d.). Request course packs in alternate formats. Resource document. Concordia University. https://www.concordia.ca/students/accessibility/e-text-service/requesting-course-packs-in-alternate-formats.html

  • Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., et al. (1995, December 7). The principles of universal design. Version 1.1. Resource document. TRACE. http://web.archive.org/web/19991008040849/http://trace.wisc.edu/text/univdesn/ud_princ/ud_princ.html

  • Cooper, M. (2014). Meeting the needs of disabled students in online distance education – An institutional case study from the Open University, UK. Distance Education in China, 2014(12), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravero, C. (2017). Socially responsible public procurement and set-asides: A comparative analysis of the US, Canada and the EU. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 8, 174–192. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DaDeppo, L. M. (2009). Integration factors related to the academic success and intent to persist of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00286.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. L., Schelly, C. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of universal design for learning intervention in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagan, M. K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Zimmerman, H. B., Aragon, M. C., Whang Sayson, H., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2017). The American freshman: National norms fall 2016. Los Angeles: Resource document. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. https://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/TheAmericanFreshman2016.pdf

  • EDUCAUSE. (2019). Continuing to look to the horizon. Resource document. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2019/4/2019-horizon-report

  • Feldman, D., Danieli, L., Lahav, Y., & Haimovich, S. (2007). Accessibility of the society in Israel at the beginning of the 21st century. The organization for Equality for People with Disabilities, Israeli Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M. J., Moreira, F., Pereira, C. S., & Durão, N. (2015). The role of mobile technologies in the teaching/learning process improvement in Portugal. Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Spain, 4600–4610. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287644975_THE_ROLE_OF_MOBILE_TECHNOLOGIES_IN_THE_TEACHINGLEARNING_PROCESS_IMPROVEMENT_IN_PORTUGAL, http://repositorio.uportu.pt/jspui/bitstream/11328/1352/1/ICERI_2015_2150_vFinal.pdf. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.

  • Fichten, C., Havel, A., Jorgensen, M., King, L., & Harvison, M. (2019). If you can’t beat them, join them: using students’ personal mobile devices in class. Academic Matters. Resource document. Dawson College. https://www.dawsoncollege.qc.ca/academic-matters/issues/2019-02/

  • Fichten, C., Jorgensen, M., Havel, A., King, L., Lussier, A., Asuncion, J., et al. (2018). Information and communication technologies: Views of Canadian college students and “excellent” professors. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J., Barile, M., Généreux, C., Fossey, M., Judd, D., et al. (2001). Technology integration for students with disabilities: Empirically based recommendations for faculty. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 7(2–3), 185–221. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.7.2.185.3869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J., & Scapin, R. (2014). Digital technology, learning, and postsecondary students with disabilities: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(4), 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Wolforth, J., Barile, M., Budd, J., Martiniello, N., & Amsel, R. (2012). Information and communication technology related needs of college and university students with disabilities. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 323–344. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., et al. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: An exploratory study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Havel, A., King, L., Jorgensen, M., Budd, J., Asuncion, J., et al. (2018). Are you in or out? Canadian students who register for disability-related services in junior/community colleges versus those who do not. Journal of Education and Human Development, 7(1), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v7n1a19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Heiman, T., Havel, A., Jorgensen, M., Budd, J., & King, L. (2016). Sustainability of disability-related services in Canada – Israel: Will the real universal design please stand up? Exceptionality Education International, 26(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., King, L., Barile, M., Havel, A., Mimouni, Z., et al. (2013). Information and communication technology profiles of college students with learning disabilities and adequate and very poor readers. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 176-188. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n1p176.

  • Getzel, E. E., & Thoma, C. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728808317658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, F. (2016, December). For some, active learning can be a nightmare. Resource document. ASEE PRISM. http://www.asee-prism.org/last-word-dec-4/

  • Government of Canada. (2018, October 22). Canadian Human Rights Commission. Resource document. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/human-rights-commission.html

  • Greenbaum, D. (2014, September). Use text-to speech functions for better proofreading. Resource document. Lifehacker. http://lifehacker.com/use-text-to-speech-functions-for-betterproofreading-1629329673

  • Heiman, T., Olenik-Shemesh, D., Kaspi-Tsahor, D., & Regev-Nevo, M. (2018). Proceedings of the Ed-ICT International Network Israel Symposium: In Search of New Designs. The Open University of Israel. Resource Document. Ed-ICT. http://ed-ict.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ProceedingsEd-ICTIsraelSymposium.pdf

  • Herbert, J. T., Hong, B. S. S., Byun, S.-Y., Welsh, W., Kurz, C. A., & Atkinson, H. A. (2014). Persistence and graduation of college students seeking disability support services. Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(1), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, A., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2017). Integrating mobile technology in higher education instruction [translation]. Academic Teaching, 6, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois State University Media Relations. (2012, July 3). SMART Boards for visually impaired. Report: The Illinois State University Faculty-Staff Newsletter. Resource document. The Illinois State University. http://mediarelations.illinoisstate.edu/report/1213/july3/smartboards.asp

  • Jones, B., Williams, N., & Rudinger, B. (2018). Designing and implementing an assistive technology lab for post-secondary education. Education Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, M., Fichten, C., King, L., & Havel, A. (2018). Proceedings of the Ed-ICT International Network Montreal Symposium: Stakeholder Perspectives. Resource document. Montréal, Québec: Adaptech Research Network. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580147

  • Jorgensen, M., Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., Budd, J., Barile, M., Asuncion, J., et al. (2015). Employment realities of recent junior/community college and university graduates and premature leavers with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Community, and Rehabilitation, 14(1). Resource document. IJDCR. http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL14_01/articles/jorgenson.shtml

  • Jorgensen, S., Fichten, C. S., Havel, A., Lamb, D., James, C., & Barile, M. (2003). Students with and without disabilities at Dawson College graduate at the same rate. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 25(2-3), 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, S., Fichten, C. S., Havel, A., Lamb, D., James, C., & Barile, M. (2005). Academic performance of college students with and without disabilities: An archival study. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 39(2), 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspi-Tsahor, D., Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2018, October). Support the transition of people with disabilities to post-compulsory education (PCE) and from PCE to employment. Paper presented at the 4th Ed-ICT International Network Symposium, Hagen, Germany. http://ed-ict.com/workshops/hagen/programme/. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.

  • Kenney, M. J., Jain, N. R., Meeks, L. M., Laird-Metke, E., Hori, J., & McGough, J. D. (2016). Learning in the digital age: Assistive technology and electronic access. In L. M. Meeks & N. R. Jain (Eds.), The guide to assisting students with disabilities: Equal access in health science and professional education (pp. 119–140). New York: Springer Publishing Company, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, E. W., Wells, R. S., Ostiguy, B. J., Manly, C. A., & Lauterbach, A. A. (2016). Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31, pp. 91–156). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, W., Wessel, R. D., & Markle, L. (2018). Persistence to graduation for students with disabilities: Implications for performance-based outcomes. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(4), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116632534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasry, N., Dugdale, M., & Charles, E. (2014). Just in time to flip your classroom. The Physics Teacher, 52(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4849151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, A. R., Murray, C., & Gerdes, H. (2011). College faculty and inclusive instruction: Self-reported attitudes and actions pertaining to universal design. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 250–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2018, June). My vision for the future of the assistive technology in education. Resource document. The Edvocate. https://www.theedadvocate.org/vision-future-assistive-technology-education/

  • Ma, J., Pender, M., & Welch, M. (2016). Education pays 2016: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Resource document. The College Board. https://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/education-pays-2016-full-report.pdf

  • McGuire, J. M. (2011). Inclusive college teaching: Universal design for instruction and diverse learners. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 1(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v1i1.80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. M., Scott, S. S., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: The paradigm, its principles, and products for enhancing instructional access. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 17(1), 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities (Ontario). (2012). Update on students with disabilities. Postsecondary Education Division of Ontario. Presentation at the University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Educational Association of Disabled Students (NEADS). (2012). Enhancing accessibility in higher education institutions: A guide for disability service providers. Resource document. NEADS. www.neads.ca/en/norc/eag/eag_en.pdf

  • Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Knokey, A. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSE 2009-3017). Resource document. National Center for Special Education Research, U.S. Department of Education. http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf

  • Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A.-M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., & Wei, X. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Resource document. National Center for Special Education Research. http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2011_09_02/nlts2_report_2011_09_02_complete.pdf

  • Policy Connect. (2018, September). Accessible virtual learning environments: Making the most of the new regulations. Resource document. Policy Connect. https://www.policyconnect.org.uk/sites/site_pc/files/report/1134/fieldreportdownload/appgatreport09-18final.pdf

  • Rosenbaum, J. E. (2018). Disabilities and degrees: Identifying health impairments that predict lower chances of college enrollment and graduation in a nationally representative sample. Community College Review, 46(2), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552118762630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Surkes, M. A., et al. (2014). The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications. Computers & Education, 72, 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. (2013, May 16). Settlement expands UC Berkeley library service to disabled. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/?detailStory=settlement-expands-uc-berkeley-library-service-to-disabled. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.

  • Seale, J. (2006). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seale, J. K. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2012). Social media in higher education. In A. Gladman (Ed.), The Europa world of learning (62nd ed., pp. 3–7). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A., Gold, D., & Wolffe, K. (2007). Employment-related experiences of youths who are visually impaired: How are these youths faring? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2015 (51st Ed.) (NCES 2016-014). Resource document. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570993.pdf

  • Summers, E., & Brauner, D. (2012, November 6). Viewing the smart board on an iPad. http://support.sas.com/misc/accessibility/education/ios/smartboard.html. Accessed 26 Sep 2019.

  • Tarawneh, H., Tarawneh, M., & Alzboun, F. (2011). Enhancing the quality of e-learning systems via multimedia learning tools. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 8(6), 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R., Fichten, C., Budd, J., Havel, A., & Asuncion, J. (2015). Blending universal design, e-learning, and information and communication technologies. In S. E. Burgstahler (Ed.), Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (2nd ed., pp. 275–284). Boston: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M., & Downs, S. (2010). Walking the walk: Modeling social model and universal design in the disabilities office. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 23(1), 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviranus, J. (2019). Learning to learn differently in higher education. Paper presented at the accesXchange Conference, Montréal, Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCAS. (2018). Disabled students’ allowances. Resource document. UCAS. https://www.ucas.com/student-finance-england/disabled-students-allowances

  • University of Washington. (2017). Symposium one: Effective models, frameworks, and approaches. Proceedings from the Ed-ICT International Network: Disabled students, ICT, post-compulsory education & employment: In search of new solutions. Resource document. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. http://ed-ict.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Symposium-Effective_models_frameworks_and_approaches_0.pdf

  • Vanderheiden, G. C. (1993). Accessible design: A handbook for more universal product design. Madison, WI: Trace Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel, R. D., Jones, J. A., Markle, L., & Westfall, C. (2009). Retention and graduation of students with disabilities: Facilitating student success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(3), 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dawson College and McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Catherine Fichten

  2. The Open University, Ra’anana, Israel

    Dorit Olenik-Shemesh

  3. Adaptech Research Network, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Jennison Asuncion & Mary Jorgensen

  4. The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    Chetz Colwell

Authors
  1. Catherine Fichten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dorit Olenik-Shemesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennison Asuncion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mary Jorgensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chetz Colwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Fichten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Wellness, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    Jane Seale

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fichten, C., Olenik-Shemesh, D., Asuncion, J., Jorgensen, M., Colwell, C. (2020). Higher Education, Information and Communication Technologies and Students with Disabilities: An Overview of the Current Situation. In: Seale, J. (eds) Improving Accessible Digital Practices in Higher Education. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37125-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37124-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37125-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation