Skip to main content

Sharing as Cultural Preexistence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 745 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

Participating in social life and sharing spaces, activities, or resources within a community are ancient constituents of the living traditions all around the world. This chapter describes, with an in-depth analysis, 12 historical typologies of shared living, distributed on the five continents. The cases highlight (1) the influence of the ethnographic characteristics in the physical and social structure of the communities and (2) the importance of the communitarian dimensions for the survival of the groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 1919, Walter Grophius defined architecture as the clear expression of the noblest thoughts of men, of their fervor, of their humanity, of their faith, and of their religion.

  2. 2.

    In the case of the construction of the Tiburtino area, a neighborhood in Rome, through a project by Quaroni and Ridolfi, architecture also becomes a representation of society. The residential districts built by INA-Casa over the years after World War II are perhaps the only design outcome of the so-called “realistic architecture”: informal and composed of a typological mix, more suitable for the rural villages that the people who would have been given new homes came from.

  3. 3.

    We must hold tight to the Greek concept of citizenship. In particular, we refer to the social thought of Aristotle that, as Maurice Le Bel highlights, excluded slaves (actually the greatest number of people living in the cities) [3].

  4. 4.

    We will see that the sharing of meals is an extremely important element in forming a sense of community, including in contemporary co-housing.

  5. 5.

    Considered the main planner of the fifth century, the plants at Miletus, Thurii, Rhodes and Piraeus are attributed to him. He is considered famous not just for the orthogonal systems of his projects (which were already present in the Greek urbanism) but for a new reduced dimension of the blocks and streets, all with the same size.

  6. 6.

    Protagoras (490–c. 420 BC) is one of the best-known sophists.

  7. 7.

    François-Marie-Charles Fourier (1772–1837).

  8. 8.

    In English, “defense of civil rights.”

  9. 9.

    In English, “harmony.”

  10. 10.

    This is a very strong social vision that will be picked up by some communities in the Israeli kibbutz, or in some cases by intentional communities of co-housing and eco-villages.

  11. 11.

    It is interesting to note that many of the utopian visions, from the Sforzinda by Francesco di Giorgio to the City of the Sun by Tommaso Campanella, prefer to confront “tabula rasa” contexts, like islands in the sea or places immersed in more or less vague plains—utopian visions that, to better express their concept of society, flee the existing reality, thereby evading that fundamental step that would indicate the processes of transformation of the society.

  12. 12.

    “Wind and water”: a tradition that allowed man to find the right equilibrium with nature and with environmental forces.

  13. 13.

    This is even more significant if we consider what the document produced by UNESCO reports: “The Tulous, although providing communal housing and reinforcing the structure of clans, were, until the twentieth century, mostly built and owned by one powerful individual” [10].

  14. 14.

    Sculpted words to celebrate the establishment of the kibbutz “Degania,” in the north of Israel.

  15. 15.

    Eighty percent of the population lives in the north and south of Israel [11].

References

  1. G. De Carlo, Sulla progettazione partecipata, in Avventure urbane. Progettare la città con gli abitanti, ed. By M. Scavi (Elèuthera, Milan, 2002), pp. 244–248

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Trabattoni, L’abitare incerto. Gli spazi collettivi all’interno delle residenze ad alta densità. Doctoral Thesis. University of Pavia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Le Bel, Natural law in the Greek period, in Natural Law Institute Proceedings, ed. By M. Le Bel, E. Levy, G.H. Gerould, H.A. Rommen, R.N. Wilkin, vol. 2 (Natural Law Institute Proceedings, Notre Dame, 1949)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Reale, A History of Ancient Philosophy, III, Systems of the Hellenist Age (State University New York U.P, New York, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Greco, La città greca antica: istituzioni, società e forme urbane (Donzelli Editore, Roma, 1999), p. 9

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Romano, Come progettavano i piani regolatori nella città greca e romana. Resource document. Estetica della città (2011). Retrieved from http://www.esteticadellacitta.it/pdf/cittaantiche.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019

  7. S. Crotti, G. Bertelli, M. Reggio, D. Vanetti, Abaco Degli Edifici nel Parco del Ticino (Alinea Editrice, Firenze, 2008), pp. 12–31

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Servier, Histoire de l’utopie (Editions Gallimard, Paris, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Fourier, La Théorie de l’unité universelle a paru primitivement sous le tire de Traité de l’association domestique-agricole, ou attraction industrielle (Anthropos, Paris, 1841)

    Google Scholar 

  10. UNESCO Advisory Body Evaluation, Advisory body evaluation (ICOMOS). Fujian Tulou (China) (2008). Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1113/documents/. Accessed 11 January 2019

  11. A. Pavin, The Kibbutz Movement, Facts and Figures 2006 (Yad Tabenkin, Ramat Efal, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Frattini, In Israele è finita l’era dei kibbutz. Nessun rappresentante nel prossimo parlamento. Corriere della Sera (2013), p. 21

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Oliver, Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture (Elsevier, Oxford, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Gideon, Earth-Sheltered Dwellings in Tunisia: Ancient Lessons for Modern Design (Associated University Presses, Cranbury, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Hill, W. Woodland, Subterranean settlements in Southern Tunisia: environmental and cultural controls on morphology, community dynamics and sustainability. Geography 88(1), 23–39 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. I. Bentley, Individualism or community? Private enterprise housing and the council estate, in Dunroamin: The Suburban Semi and Its Enemies, ed. By P. Oliver, I. Davis, I. Bentley (Barrie & Jenkins, London, 1982), pp. 104–121

    Google Scholar 

  17. C.I. Ejizu, African traditional religions and the promotion of community-living in Africa. Resource document. African Traditions Electronic Encyclopedia (2017). Retrieved from https://traditions-afripedia.fandom.com/wiki/African_Traditional_Religions_And_The_Promotion_Of_Community-Living_In_Africa

  18. S. Umali, Repackaging “traditional” architecture of the African Village in Zimbabwe. Urban and architectural heritage conservation within sustainability, in Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation Within Sustainability, ed. By K. Hmood (Intechopen, London, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Laburn-Peart, Precolonial towns of Southern Africa. Integrating the teaching of planning history and urban morphology. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 21, 267–273 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Nutini, With apologies to Dr. Caso. Am. Anthropol. 63, 1100–1101 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Lockhart, The Nahuas After the Conquest: A Social and Cultural History of the Indians of Central Mexico, Sixteenth Through Eighteenth Centuries (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Nutini, P. Carrasco, J. Taggart, Essays on Mexican Kinship (University of Pittsburgh Press, London, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Aguilar-Moreno, Handbook to Life in the Aztec World (Oxford University Press, New York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Van Zantwijk, The Aztec Arrangement. The Social History of Pre-Spanish Mexico (University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M.E. Smith, The Aztecs, 2nd edn. (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. W.L. Merrill, M. Heras Quezada, Rarámuri personhood and ethnicity: another perspective. Am. Ethnol. 24(2), 302–306 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. W.L. Merrill, Raramuri Souls: Knowledge and Social Process in Northern Mexico (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Milliken, The Yanomami are great observers of nature. Survival International (2019). Retrieved from https://www.survivalinternational.org/articles/3162-yanomami-botanical-knowledge. Accessed 15 May 2019

  29. M. Kawharu, Environment as a marae locale, in Kaitiaki: Maori and the Environment, ed. By R. Selby, P. Moore, M. Mulholland (Huia, Wellington, 2010), pp. 221–239

    Google Scholar 

  30. M.R. Austin, A description of the Maori Marae, in The Mutual Interaction Of People and Their Built Environment, ed. By A. Raport (Mouton Publishers, The Hague, 1976), pp. 230–241

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Tapsell, Marae and tribal identity in urban Aotearoa/New Zealand. Pac. Stud. 25(1/2), 141–171 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Amoamo, T.T. Ōpōtiki, The complementary of history and art in Tutamure meeting-house, Omarumutu Marae, Opotiki. J. Polyn. Soc. 93(1), 5–38 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giorgi, E. (2020). Sharing as Cultural Preexistence. In: The Co-Housing Phenomenon. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37097-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics