Abstract
What I want to consider in this chapter is whether or not questions that arise from the transhumanist debate are to be kept firmly within a secular, empirical, scientific arena and, if this were the case, is science sufficient in answering those kinds of questions that do arise? If it is not sufficient, then where else might we look for guidance? How far can the boundaries be stretched before they begin to tear? Whilst many transhumanists, our secular transhumanists, are quite prepared to be ‘interdisciplinary’ in their methodology, hence allowing such disciplines as philosophy and, indeed, the ‘arts’, within these boundaries, there is still, alas, some robust resistance to religion which, I believe, is understandable, but also misplaced. The methodology adopted for this book is phenomenological in the sense that an understanding of what it means to be human (and, by implication, transhuman) requires an understanding of human experience that, in itself, cannot be limited to the acquisition of empirical data. Religion, and in this case Islam, offers important insights into this understanding of the human.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Academically speaking, Sheldrake is extremely well-qualified in biological science and his ideas have appeared in a number of prominent scientific publications, but his interest in Indian philosophy especially, which has impacted upon his scientific views, has drawn considerable criticism from the scientific community.
- 2.
Note: All quotes from the Qur’an are from the translation by M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, Oxford University Press, 2005.
Bibliography
Note: All quotes from the Qur’an are from the translation by M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, Oxford University Press, 2005.
Books
Almond, Ian. 2010. A History of Islam in German Thought: From Leibniz to Nietzsche. Oxon: Routledge.
Blackburn, Simon. 1996. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Calvino, Italo. 1988. Six Memos for the Next Millennium. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dawkins, Richard. 2007. The God Delusion. London: Black Swan.
Dummett, Michael. 2010. The Nature and Future of Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Eldredge, Niles. 1982. The Monkey Business: A Scientist Looks at Creationism. New York: Washington Square Press.
Goetz, Stewart, and Charles Taliaferro. 2008. Naturalism. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. Rocks of Ages. New York: Vintage.
Harari, Yuval Noah. 2011. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London: Penguin.
Harris, Sam. 2010. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. London: Transworld.
Heidegger, Martin. 1982. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Hughes, Bettany. 2010. The Hemlock Cup: Socrates, Athens and the Search for the Good Life. London: Jonathan Cape.
Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. 2nd ed. Edited by P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1900. Dreams of a Spirit-Seer. Translated by Emanuel F. Goerwitz. London: Swan Sonnenschein and Co.
———. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mabey, Richard. 2015. Cabaret of Plants: Botany and Imagination. London: Profile Books Ltd.
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pigliucci, Massimo. 2010. Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Plantinga, Alvin. 2011. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plato. 2012. Republic. Translated by Christopher Rowe. London: Penguin.
Quine, W.V. 1981. Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Russell, Matheson. 2006. Husserl: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.
Sheldrake, Rupert. 2012. The Science Delusion: Feeling the Spirit of Enquiry. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Steiner, George. 1989. Martin Heidegger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Swedenborg, Emanuel. 2009. Arcana Coelestia. Vols. 1–12. Translated by John Clowes. West Chester, PA: Swedenborg Foundation.
Swinburne, Richard. 2004. The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taliaferro, Charles. 1994. Consciousness and the Mind of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ward, Keith. 2008. Why There Almost Certain Is a God. Oxford: Lion Book.
Williams, Bernard. 2006. Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Boudry, Maarten, Stefaan Blancke, and Johan Braeckman. 2010. How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Foundations of Science 15 (3): 227–244.
———. 2012. Grist to the Mill of Anti-Evolutionism: The Failed Strategy of Ruling the Supernatural Out of Science by Philosophical Fiat. Science and Education 21: 1151–1165.
Cellucci, Carlo. 2015. Is Philosophy a Humanistic Discipline? Philosophia 43: 259–269.
Chalmers, David. 1995. Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3): 200–219.
Dembski, William. 2002. Kurzweil’s Impoverished Spirituality. In Are We Spiritual Machines? Ray Kurzweil vs. The Critics of Strong AI, ed. J.W. Richards, 98–114. Seattle: The Discovery Institute.
Fishman, Yonatan I., and Maarten Boudry. 2013. Does Science Presuppose Naturalism (or Anything at All)? Science and Education 22 (5): 921–949.
Forrest, Barbara. 2000. Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying the Connection. Philo 3: 7–29.
Law, Stephen. 2017. Scientism! In Science Unlimited? The Challenge of Scientism, ed. Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci, 121–144. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Nagel, Thomas. 1974. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review 83 (4): 435–450.
Plantinga, Alvin. 1996. Science: Augustinian or Duhemian? Faith and Philosophy 13: 369–394.
———. 1997. Methodological Naturalism. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 49: 143–154.
Roy, Rustum. 2005. Scientism and Technology as Religions. Zygon 40 (4): 835–844.
Stilwell, Phil. 2009. The Status of Methodological Naturalism as Justified by Precedent. Studies in Liberal Arts and Sciences 41: 229–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jackson, R. (2020). Secular Transhumanism as Scientism?. In: Muslim and Supermuslim. Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and its Successors. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37093-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37093-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37092-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37093-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)