Advertisement

The Fate of Traditional Enlightenment in the West

Chapter
  • 2.8k Downloads

Abstract

This chapter traces the ongoing transformation of the traditional Buddhist enlightenment ideal in convert Western Buddhist communities due to its conflict with deeply held Western beliefs concerning human well-being and flourishing. One way to resolve the tensions between enlightenment and eudaimonia would be to “domesticate” enlightenment by blending those aspects of it that are consonant with modern Western belief with compatible aspects of eudaimonia. This new resulting ideal, “eudaimonic enlightenment,” could serve as the new end-goal of modern Western Buddhist practice. The chapter proposes a ten-attribute model of eudaimonic enlightenment that illustrates what such a blended ideal might look like. It then concludes by demonstrating that more than being a mere thought experiment, this blended ideal is already reflected in the contemporary rhetoric of many Western Secular Buddhist, Insight Meditation, and Zen Buddhist communities.

References

  1. Batchelor, Stephen. Buddhism Without Beliefs. New York: Riverhead, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. Batchelor, Stephen. Confession of a Buddhist Atheist. New York: Spiegel and Grau, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Batchelor, Stephen. “A Secular Buddhism,” Journal of Global Buddhism 13 (2012): 87–107.Google Scholar
  4. Batchelor, Stephen. After Buddhism: Rethinking the Dharma for a Secular Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Batchelor, Stephen. Secular Buddhism: Imagining the Dharma in an Uncertain World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Dōgen, Eihei. Treasury of the True Dharma Eye: Zen Master Dogen’s Shobo Genzo, translated by Tanahashi, Kazuaki. Boston: Shambhala, 2016.Google Scholar
  7. Ford, James Ishmael. “What is Enlightenment? Zen and the Nature of Awakening,” Monkey Mind: Easily Distracted (blog), December 31, 2017. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/monkeymind/2017/12/enlightenment-zen-nature-awakening.html
  8. Gendlin, Eugene. A Process Model (Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
  9. Gleig, Ann. American Dharma: Buddhism Beyond Modernity New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keown, Damien. The Nature of Buddhist Ethics. New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. Kornfield, Jack. A Path with Heart: A Guide Through the Perils and Promises of Spiritual Life. New York: Bantam, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. Maturana, Humberto and Francisco Varela. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living Dordrecht, Holland; Boston: D. Reidel, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ted Meissner, “If Secular Buddhists Don’t Believe in Rebirth, Then What Motivates them to Practice,” Secular Buddhist Association FAQ [webpage], http://secularbuddhism.org/faq/.
  14. Port, Dosho. Two Kinds of Buddhists? Unrolling the Traditionalist and Modernist Distinction, Wild Fox Zen (blog), September 18, 2017. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildfoxzen/2017/09/two-kinds-of-buddhists-unrolling-the-traditionalist-and-modernist-distinction.html
  15. Russell, Daniel. Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. “The Dart” (Part of the Vedanāsaṃyutta), in The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya, Vol. 1 & 2, trans. Bhikkhu Bodhi. Boston: Wisdom, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. New York: Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.White PlainsUSA

Personalised recommendations