Skip to main content

Introduction: How Not to Write the History of the Spanish American Enlightenment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deconstructing the Enlightenment in Spanish America

Abstract

The chapter discusses the general contours of the Spanish American Enlightenment. It outlines local alternatives to the dominant Enlightenment proposed by recent criticism. It challenges the adequacy of the view that Spain’s and Spanish America’s Enlightenments were reform-based, “moderate” Enlightenments cut off from radical, philosophical alternatives. Sharman’s view is that the Spanish American Ilustración bears the trace elements of other, more radical Enlightenments that show up explicitly in certain texts or implicitly in denials of their presence. He lays out the five key questions of the book and the four key assumptions of contemporary scholarship on the Enlightenment. His proposal is that the anxiety of influence can be overcome once it is understood that all Enlightenments have their constitutive tensions, compromises, and contradictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Trabulse (1974, p. 31). My account comes from the opening pages of Trabulse’s book.

  2. 2.

    Karen Stolley (2013) says that the Enlightenment was not a purely secular affair, only then to present a picture of Catalina de Herrera’s life and writings from which the Enlightenment is completely absent, and thus no assessment of a religious Enlightenment possible.

  3. 3.

    I have developed this point at length in relation to Walter Mignolo (Sharman 2013).

  4. 4.

    See Chiaramonte (1982) on the Italian tradition of political economy that influenced Spanish America.

  5. 5.

    This observation was first made by Hamnett (2017, p. 7).

  6. 6.

    See Israel (2001, p. 233, and 2006, pp. 49–50).

  7. 7.

    María Portuondo’s (2009) work on the Portuguese maritime tradition unearths important Iberian contributions to early modern knowledge but concludes that the Hispanic world invented modernity. This is a tic of contemporary scholarship that consists in singling out elements of a complex equation whose other components it seems only dimly aware of.

  8. 8.

    For a good account of some of these “common threads,” see Hamnett’s (2017) “Introduction.”

  9. 9.

    See Rama (1984).

  10. 10.

    See Portillo Valdés (2006).

  11. 11.

    See Catherine Davies et al. (2006).

  12. 12.

    See Van Young (2001).

References

  • Astigarraga, Jesús. 2015. Introduction: Admirer, rougir, imiter—Spain and the European Enlightenment. In The Spanish Enlightenment Revisited, ed. J. Astigarraga, 1–17. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. 2001. How to Write the History of the New World: Histories, Epistemologies, and Identities in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 2009. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Trans. F. C. A. Koelln and J. P. Pettegrove. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaramonte, José Carlos. 1982. La crítica ilustrada de la realidad. Economía y sociedad en el pensamiento argentino e iberoamericano del siglo XVIII. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavijero, Francisco Javier. 1780. Historia antigua de México. http://www.ellibrototal.com/ltotal/?t=1&d=5006.

  • Davies, Catherine, Claire Brewster, and Hilary Owen. 2006. South American Independence: Gender, Politics, Text. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Entin, Gabriel. 2013. El patriotismo americano en el siglo XVIII: ambigüedades de un discurso politico hispano. In Las independencias hispanoamericanas: Un objeto de historia, ed. Véronique Hébrard and Geneviève Verdo, 19–33. Madrid: Casa de Velázquez.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamnett, Brian. 2017. The Enlightenment in Iberia and Ibero-America. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Ruth. 2000. Sceptres and Sciences in the Spains: Four Humanists and the New Philosophy (ca. 1680–1740). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, Jonathan. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1650–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, Ulrich L. 2016. The Catholic Enlightenment: The Forgotten History of a Global Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lladó, Andrés Saumell. n.d. Introducción. In Antonio de Ulloa, Viaje a la América meridional, vol. I. Ed. Andrés Saumell Lladó. Madrid: Dastin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portillo Valdés, José M. 2006. Crisis atlántica. Autonomía e independencia en la crisis de la monarquía hispana. Madrid: Fundación Carolina, Centro de Estudios Hispánicos e Iberoamericanos and Marcial Pons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portuondo, María M. 2009. Cosmography at the Casa, Consejo, and Corte During the Century of Discovery. In Science in the Spanish and Portuguese Empires, 1500–1800, ed. Daniela Bleichmar, 57–77. Stanford: California State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rama, Ángel. 1984. La ciudad letrada. Hanover: Ediciones del Norte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, Juan José. 2006. Science in Latin America: A History. Trans. Bernabé Madrigal. Austin: Texas University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharman, Adam. 2013. Otherwise Engaged: After Hegel and the Philosophy of History. Nottingham: CCCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolley, Karen. 2013. Domesticating Empire: Enlightenment in Latin America. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trabulse, Elías. 1974. Ciencia y religión en el siglo XVII. Mexico: Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Historia de la ciencia en México: Estudios y textos. Vol. 1. Mexico: Conacyt/Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Young, Eric. 2001. The Other Rebellion: Popular Violence, Ideology, and the Mexican Struggle for Independence, 1810–1821. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, Arthur, ed. 1961. Latin America and the Enlightenment. Introd. Federico de Onís. 2nd ed. New York: Great Seal Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Sharman .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharman, A. (2020). Introduction: How Not to Write the History of the Spanish American Enlightenment. In: Deconstructing the Enlightenment in Spanish America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37019-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics