Skip to main content

The Spanish Case: The Benefits of a National Coordination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 153 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Series on Public Policy ((ISPP))

Abstract

Chapter 4 “The Spanish Case: The Benefits of a National Coordination” is about Cohesion Policy implementation in Spain from 1989 to the present day. It explores the way in which the European policy was molded according to the domestic preferences and the legacies historically rooted in the issue of regional development, by analyzing how the three investigated challenges (institutional, strategic, and administrative) had been addressed during the different programming cycles, as well as the possible benefits and/or criticalities that they had implicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even if formally elaborated, the fourth DP (1976–1979) was never applied since it coincided with the years of the Spanish transition into democracy after the death of the Generalissimo.

References

  • Andalusia Region. (2000). Piano Operativo Regionale Andalusia 2000–2006. Siviglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andalusia Region. (2003). Evaluación intermedia del Programa Operativo Integrado de Andalucía 2000–2006. Universidad de Málaga, Universidad de Almería e Universidad de Sevilla, Siviglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applica, IsmeriEuropa. (2010b). Expert Evaluation Network Delivering Policy Analysis on the Performance of Cohesion Policy 2007–2013. Task 2: Country Report on Achievements of Cohesion Policy Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applica, IsmeriEuropa, Wiiw (2010). Ex Post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes 2000–2006 Financed by the European Regional Development Fund in Objective 1 and 2 Regions – Working Package 1: Coordination, Analysis and Synthesis Task 4: Development and Achievements in Member States. Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arraujo. (1988). Transición y cambio en la política regional española. Madrid: Ministerio de Hacienda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Jones, R. (2000). Has EU Regional Policy Empowered the Regions? A Study of Spain and the United Kingdom. Regional & Federal Studies, 10(3), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baklanoff, E. N. (1976). The Economic Transformation of Spain: Systemic Change and Accelerated Growth, 1959–1973. World Development, 4(9), 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (1990, November 15). Annual Report on the Implementation of the Reform of the Structural Funds 1989, COM (90) 516 final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (1991, December 4). Annual Report on the Implementation of the Reform of the Structural Funds 1990, COM (91) 400 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (1992, October 27). Annual Report on the Implementation of the Reform of the Structural Funds 1991, COM (92) 1975 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (1994c). Quadro comunitario di sostegno per lo sviluppo e l’adeguamento strutturale delle Regioni in ritardo di sviluppo (Obiettivo no 1) 1994–1999, Spain, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (1995, March 20). Fifth Annual Report on the Implementation of the Regorm of the Structural Funds 1993, COM (1995) 30 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (1997, October 30). Eight Annual Report of the Structural Funds 1996, Brussels, COM(97) 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (2001, May 7). Comuncazione della Commissione al Consiglio, al Parlamento Europeo, al Comitato Economico e Sociale e al Comitato delle Regioni – I Risultati della Programmazione dei Fondi Strutturali per il periodo 2000/2006 (Obiettivo 1), Bruxelles, COM(2001) 378 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (2002, October 10). Thirtheenth Annual Report on the Structural Funds 2001, Brussels, COM(2002)591 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC. (2013a, July 10). Evaluation of the Main Achievements of Cohesion Policy Programmes and Projects over the Longer Term in 15 Selected Regions (From 1989–1993 Programming Period to the Present), 2011.CE.16.B.AT.015. Case Study Andalucia. Retrieved November 28, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/eval2007/cohesion_achievements/andalucia.pdf.

  • CEC. (2013b). Evaluation of the Main Achievements of Cohesion Policy Programmes and Projects Over the Longer Term in 15 Selected Regions (From 1989–1993 Programming Period to the Present), 2011.CE.16.B.AT.015. Case Study Galicia. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/eval2007/cohesion_achievements/galicia.pdf.

  • CEC. (2014). Investment for Jobs and Growth. Promoting Development and Good Governance in EU Regions and Cities. Sixth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Retrieved July, 27, 2019, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cohesion_report.

  • CEET – ECOTEC Research & Consulting Ltd. (2002a). Member State Report Objective 1 Evaluation 1994–1999 Spain, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEET – ECOTEC Research & Consulting Ltd. (2002b). Ex-Post Evaluation of Objective 1 1994–1999. A Final Report to the Directorate General for Regional Policy, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Roura, J. R. (2010a). Spain as a Case-Study: Regional Problems and Policies. In J. R. Cuadrado-Roura (Ed.), Regional Policy, Economic Growth and Convergence. Lessons from the Spanish Case (pp. 3–18). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Roura, J. R. (2010b). Regional Economy and Policy in Spain (1960–1975). In J. R. Cuadrado-Roura (Ed.), Regional Policy, Economic Growth and Convergence. Lessons from the Spanish Case (pp. 19–51). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ECORYS et al. (2006). Strategic Evaluation on Transport Investment Priorities Under Structural and Cohesion Funds for the Programming Period 2007–2013. No 2005 CE.16.AT-014. Synthesis Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, M. (2013). Cohesion Policy and Its Components: Past, Present and Future. WP8 Task 2: Cohesion Policy Lessons From Earlier EU/EC Enlargements. Spain Case Study Report. European Policies Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes Quintana. (1984). La situación económica española. Boletín de Información, 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzàles, M. J. (1978). Los economistas en el preludio de la planificación indicativa. Intestigaciones Económicas, May-August (6), 121–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebbert, N. (1982). Regional Policy in Spain. Geoforum, 13(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (1998). New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancha-Navarro, T., & Cuadrado, R. (1999). Los servicios y el ciclo económico español. Economistas, 2(ARIO), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancha-Navarro, T., & Garrido-Yserte, R. (2010). The Evolution of Spanish Regional Policy, 1977–2008. In J. R. Cuadrado-Roura (Ed.), Regional Policy, Economic Growth and Convergence (pp. 53–79). Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medhurst, K. N. (1973). Government in Spain. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mella Marquez. (1993). Las areas deprimidas de España, Estudios de la Fundación Fondo para la Investigación Económica y Social. Obra Social de la Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morata, F. (2004). Gobernanza multinivel en la Unión Europea. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morata, F., & Muñoz, X. (1996). Vying for European Funds: Territorial Restructuring in Spain. In L. Hooghe (Ed.), Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-level Governance (pp. 195–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morata, F., & Popartan, L. (2008). Spain. In M. Baun & D. Marek (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy After Enlargement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota, F., & Noferini, A. (2010). Evidence from Structural Funds Implementation in Two Spanish Regions. In S. Milio (Ed.), From Policy to Implementation in the European Union: The Challenge of a Mulit-Level Governance System. London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. G. (1971). In the Twilight of the Franco Era. Foreign Affairs Quarterly Review, 49(2), 343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Gorostiza, J. L., & Jiménez, L. (2009). Spanish Economists Facing Indicative Planning in the 1960s. Storia del Pensiero Economico, 77–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. (1975). Regional Development Policy and Planning in Spani. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, M. (2004). European Regional Policy. The Impact of Structural Transfers and the Partnership Principle since the 1988 Reform. Purdue: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svimez. (1996). Rapporto 1996 sui Mezzogiorni d’Europa. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tondl, G. (1998). EU Regional Policy in the Southern Periphery: Lessons for the Future. South European Society and Politics, 3(1), 93–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viñas, R. (2009). The European Union’s Drive Towards Public Policy Evaluation. The Case of Spain. Evaluation, 15(14), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuill, D., et al. (1990). European Regional Incentives. London: Bowker Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuill, D., Méndez, C., & Wishlade, F. (2006). EU Cohesion Policy 2007–2013 and the Implications for Spain, Who Gets What, When and How? European Policy Research Paper, Number 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaratiegui, J. M. (2015). Indicative Planning in Spain (1964–1975). International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 5(2), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Casula, M. (2020). The Spanish Case: The Benefits of a National Coordination. In: Economic Growth and Cohesion Policy Implementation in Italy and Spain. International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36998-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics