Skip to main content

Democracy, Communities and Interdependence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automation and Human Solidarity
  • 306 Accesses

Abstract

Collective activities, such as most music and sport, require co-ordination because they highlight individuals’ interdependence. Sustainability and economic security are undermined by growing inequalities of income and status; liberal democracy needs to be underpinned by bonds of community and association to resist populist authoritarianism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham, K.G. and Kearney, M.S. (2018), ‘Explaining the Decline in Employment-to-Population Ratio: A Review of the Evidence’, Working Paper 24333, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D.H. and Dorn, D. (2013), ‘The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarisation of the US Labor Market’, American Economic Review, 103(5), pp. 1553–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L.M. (2016), Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bastani, A. (2019), Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1843), ‘Constitutional Code’, in J. Bowring (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Edinburgh: Tait, vol. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, G.M., Jaimovich, N. and Siu, H.E. (2017), ‘Disappearing Routine Jobs: Who, How, and Why?’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 91(September), pp. 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1961), Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C.B. (2019), The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haagh, L. (2019), The Case for Universal Basic Income, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B. (1996), A Theory of Poverty and Social Exclusion, Cambridge: Polity, (republished by Rawat Publications, New Delhi, India, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B. (2010), Why the Third Way Failed: Economics, Morality and the Origins of the Big Society, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., James, S., Kay, H. and Redley, M. (1992), Trapped in Poverty?: Labour-Market Decisions in Low-Income Households, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2010), Ill Fares the Land: A Treatise on our Present Discontents, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F. and Murnane, R.J. (2004), The New Division of Labor: How Computers are Creating the Next Job Market, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P.H. (2004), Growing Public, The Story: Public Spending and Social and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981), After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malleson, T. (2014), After Occupy: Economic Democracy for the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marske, C. (1990), Communities of Fate: Readings in the Social Organization of Risk, Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1859), ‘On Liberty’, in Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government, London: Dent, (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1861), ‘Principles of Political Economy, with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy’, in J.M. Robson (ed.), Collected Works, Oxford: Oxford University Press, vols. 2 and 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2017), How Did We Get into This Mess? Politics, Economy, Nature, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2018), ‘Populists are on the Rise but this can be a Moment for Progressives Too’, The Guardian, 10 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, A. (2019), The Demons of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1991), The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for Twenty-First Century Capitalism, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selbourne, D. (2019), The Free Society in Crisis, London: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson, N. (2018), The Finance Curse: How Global Finance is Making Us All Poorer, Oxford: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.J.P. (1955), Bismarck: The Man and the Statesman, London: Hamilton, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de (1836–1839), Democracy in America, London: Collins, (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bill Jordan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jordan, B. (2020). Democracy, Communities and Interdependence. In: Automation and Human Solidarity. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36959-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36959-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36958-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36959-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics