Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Organizational Mindset of Entrepreneurship pp 79–100Cite as

Exploring the Effects of Learning Organization on Innovative Work Behaviors of White-Collar Workers: Sample from Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1065 Accesses

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to determine the effects of seven different learning organization types—such as continuous learning, inquiry and dialog, team learning, embedded systems, empowerment, system connection, sharing systems, strategic leadership on innovative work behaviors of white-collar employees who work in different companies. In order to test these effects, an inquiry was conducted on the employees who were the labor of Turkey’s top 500 industrial companies determined by Istanbul Chamber of Industry. Data obtained from 526 participants were used in the analysis of the research. As a result of the correlation analysis, significant and positive relations were determined between all components of learning organization and IWB. Regression analysis was performed to reveal the effects of learning organizations on IWB. According to the results, it has been identified that only continuous learning (0.479, p < 0.000) and strategic leadership (0.381, p < 0.000) have statistically significant and positive effects on innovative behavior. Whereas, it was found that all the other subdimensions of learning organization (inquiry and dialog, team learning, embedded systems, empowerment, system connection, sharing systems) do not have statistically significant effects on the innovative work behaviors of employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard Business School Backround Note, pp. 196–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, S. H., & Goransson, L. (1997). Transformational and adaptive learning within the learning organization: A framework for research and application. The Learning Organization, 4(3), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awang, A. H., Sapie, N. M., Hussain, M. Y., Ishak, S., & Yusaof, R. (2014). Organizational learning and work environment: A formation of innovative work behavior at Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). In ICICKM 2014 11th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning Sydney (pp. 30–39), Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an ecology of mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. K., & O’Brien, M. J. (1994). The building blocks of the learning organization. Training, 31(6), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 432–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazeal, D. V., & Herbert, T. T. (1999). The genesis of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadwallader, S., Jarvis, C. B., Bitner, M. J., & Ostrom, A. L. (2010). Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, G., Mobley, S., & Marshall, L. (1994). Grasping the learning organization. Training & Development, 48(6), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavus, M. F., & Bicer, M. (2016). Relationship between organizational ethical climate and innovative behavior: An example from Turkey. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(10), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, A., & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S. (1994). The learning organization. Work Study, 43(8), 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. E. (1997). Two questions which opened the door to organizational growth. Journal of Workplace Learning, 9(4), 116–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J. P. J. (2006). Individual innovation: The connection between leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior. Paper provided by EIM business and policy research in its series scales research reports with number R200604. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from http://www.entrepreneurship-sme.eu/pdf-ez/R20 0604.pdf

  • De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation (pp. 1–27). Zoetermeer-Netherlands: Scientific analysis of entrepreneurship and SMEs.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulaimi, M. F., Ling, F. Y., & Bajracharya, A. (2003). Organizational motivation and inter-organizational interaction in construction innovation in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A., & Moingeon, B. (1998). From organizational learning to the learning organization. Management Learning, 29(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Er-Ming, X., & Han, Z. (2008). Organizational learning and innovation: Research based on different ownership identity. In 15th International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 10–12 September (pp. 921–926), CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshlaghy, A. T., & Maatofi, A. (2011). Learning orientation, innovation and performance: Evidence from small-sized business firms in Iran. European Journal of Social Sciences, 19(1), 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzamel, M., Lilley, S., & Willmott, H. (1994). The ‘new organization’ and the ‘new managerial work’. European Management Journal, 12(4), 454–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (1978). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, T. (1997). The learning organization: A review and evaluation. The Learning Organization, 4(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, P., & Whiting, P. (1997). Success factors in learning organizations: An empirical study. Industrial and Commercial Training, 29(2), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. W. (1963). Self-renewal: The individual and the innovative society. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, M. A., Marsick, V. J., Van Buren, M. E., Spiro, M. S., & Senge, P. (1996). Learning organizations come alive. Training & Development, 50(12), 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griego, O. V., Geroy, G. D., & Wright, P. C. (2000). Predictors of learning organizations: A human resource development practitioner’s perspective. The Learning Organization, 7(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (1993). Human resource management: Issues & strategies. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H., Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1998). Dynamics manufacturing: Creating the learning organization. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. In S. T. Fiske, D. L. Schachter, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 569–598). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, W. D. (1995). The learning organization: Some reflections on organizational renewal. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16(8), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, M. (2000). Managerial perceptions of barriers to becoming a ‘learning organization’. The Learning Organization, 7(3), 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoke, L. B., Sturko, P. A., Wood, N. B., & Wu, L. J. (2012). Are academic departments perceived as learning organizations? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(4), 436–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., Shea, C. M., & Higgins, C. A. (2005). Champions of product innovations: Defining, developing, and validating a measure of champion behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 641–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. The Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iles, P. (1994). Developing learning environments: Challenges for theory, research and practice. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(3), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. E., & Bate, J. D. (2013). The power of strategy innovation: A new way of linking creativity and strategic planning to discover great business opportunities. New York: AMACOM Division of American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. (2005). What campuses need to know about organizational learning and the learning organization. New Directions for Higher Education, 131, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: Introduction. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 1–9). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, G. L. (1969). Organizational renewal. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, M. (1997). Creating a learning environment. Human Resources Professional, 10, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz, R., Friedman, V. J., & Popper, M. (2007). Demystifying organizational learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, M. J. (1996). Building the learning organization: A systems approach to quantum improvement and global success. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1999). Facilitating learning in organizations: Making learning count. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, K. (1995). Acquiring knowledge and skills for twenty-first century supervision. Management Development Review, 8(5), 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monica Hu, M. L., Horng, J. S., & Sun, Y. H. C. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (1993). Learning organization. In valuing the learning organization. Paper presented at the Ernst & Young National Professional Development Group, McLean, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, L., & Nadler, Z. (1994). Designing training programs: The critical events model (2nd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1/2), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, F. (2000). Maximizing innovation in the workplace: The development of a new model and measurement tool. Training Journal, 8, 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1988). Learning company project: A report on work under-taken October 1987 to April 1988. Sheffield: The Training Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1991). The learning company: A strategy for sustainable development. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadani, V., & Gërguri, S. (2011). Innovations: Principles and strategies. Strategic Change, 20(3–4), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadani, V., Gërguri, S., Rexhepi, G., & Abduli, S. (2013). Innovation and economic development: The case of FYR of Macedonia. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 15(3), 324–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, J., Park, T., & Lee, D. H. (2010). Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation. Technovation, 30, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T., Clemson, B., & Keating, C. (1997). Development of high performance organizational learning units. The Learning Organization, 4(5), 228–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (1998). Creating a learning organization in higher education. Industrial and Commercial Training, 30(1), 16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackmann, S. A., Eggenhofer-Rehart, P. M., & Friesl, M. (2009). Sustainable change: Long-term efforts toward developing a learning organization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(4), 521–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Xanthopoulou, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The gain spiral of resources and work engagement: Sustaining a positive worklife. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 118–131). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1975). Deutero-learning in organizations: Learning for. Organizational Gynamics, 4(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (1994). Are champions different from non-champions? Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 397–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Škerlavaj, M., Song, J. H., & Lee, Y. (2010). Organizational learning culture, innovative culture and innovations in South Korean firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6390–6403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. H., Lim, D. H., Kang, I. G., & Kim, W. (2014). Team performance in learning organizations: Mediating effect of employee engagement. The Learning Organization, 21(5), 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stata, R., & Almond, P. (1989). Organizational learning: The key to management innovation. The Training and Development Sourcebook, 2, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinarski-Peretz, H., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Linking care felt to engagement in innovative behaviors in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological conditions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899–8908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1996). In action: Creating the learning organization. Arlington, TX: ASTD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. (1997). Dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire [survey]. Warwick, RI: Partners for the Learning Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J., O’Cass, A., & Julian, C. (2006). Does industry matter? Examining the role of industry structure and organizational learning in innovation and brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 59, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, P. (1994). The concept of the learning organization. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4, 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M., Tannenbaum, R., Griffin, P. Y., & Quade, K. (2003). Organization development at work: Conversations on the values, applications, and future of OD (Vol. 22). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. W., Song, J. H., Lim, D. H., & Joo, B. K. (2010). Structural determinants of team performance: The mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge. Human Resource Development International, 13(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. D. (2012). How to promote innovative behavior at work? The role of justice and support within organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 220–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vocational School of Tourism and Hotel Management, Kilis 7 Aralık University, Kilis, Turkey

    Biçer Mehmet

Authors
  1. Biçer Mehmet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biçer Mehmet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. South-East European University, Tetovo, North Macedonia

    Veland Ramadani

  2. International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Ramo Palalić

  3. Montpellier Research in Management, Montpellier Business School, Montpellier, France

    Léo-Paul Dana

  4. Entrepreneurship Northwest, Boise, ID, USA

    Norris Krueger

  5. University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

    Andrea Caputo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mehmet, B. (2020). Exploring the Effects of Learning Organization on Innovative Work Behaviors of White-Collar Workers: Sample from Turkey. In: Ramadani, V., Palalić, R., Dana, LP., Krueger, N., Caputo, A. (eds) Organizational Mindset of Entrepreneurship. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36951-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation