Skip to main content

Corporate Governance Concerns and Bankability Issues of the Intangible Assets: More Guarantees with Less Collateral?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Valuation of Digital Intangibles
  • 1575 Accesses

Abstract

The bankability of intangible assets represents a dominant aspect of the investment and valuation process. Intangibles create scalable value, levered by debt and serviced by incremental EBITDA and cash flows. However, they intrinsically incorporate information asymmetries and may so discourage debt but are a vital component of cash-generating value, so representing a key factor for debt servicing, with paradoxical effects (more guarantees with less collateral?). Ability to improve cash flows emerges as a key feature of value-enhancing intangibles, bypassing their lack of collateral value. Corporate governance concerns, unless softened, exacerbate bankability issues and make fair appraisal more difficult to carry on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Selected References

  • Abell, M. (2009). Mixed know-how and patent licensing agreement. In D. Campbell & R. Proksch (Eds.), International Business Transactions (pp. 5–20). Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (2000). Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2747–2766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleszczyk, A., De George, E. T., Aytekin, E., & Vasvari, F. P. (2020, January). Debt financing and balance-sheet collateral: Evidence from fair-value adjustments. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3032580.

  • Al-Najjar, B., & Elgammal, M. M. (2013). Innovation and credit ratings, does it matter? UK evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 20(5), 428–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, D. (2004). IC valuation and measurement: Classifying the state of the art. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 230–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson, S. (2011). Disclosure of non-financial information in the annual report: A management-team perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeyens, K., & Manigart, S. (2006). Who gets private equity? The role of debt capacity, growth and intangible assets (Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2006-24). Available at http://ideas.repec.org/p/vlg/vlgwps/2006-24.html.

  • Ballester, M., Garcia-Ayuso, M., & Livnat, J. (2003). The economic value of the R&D intangible asset. European Accounting Review, 12(4), 605–633. Available at http://3ws-contabilidad.ua.es/trabajos/2024.pdf.

  • Black, F. (1986). Noise. Journal of Finance, 41(3), 529–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973, May–June). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 637–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boujelben, S., & Fedhila, H. (2011). The effects of intangible investments on future OCF. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., Jarrel, G. A., & Kim, E. H. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 857–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. J. (1990, July). Latent assets. The Journal of Finance, 709–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoles, Y. R. (2010). Towards the convergence of accounting treatment for intangible assets. Intangible Capital, 6(2), 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degryse, H., De Goeij, P., & Kappert, P. (2012). The impact of firm and industry characteristics on small firm’s capital structure. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 431–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galai, D., & Masulis, R., (1976, January–March). The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1982). Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In J. McCall (Ed.), The economics of information and uncertainty. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Meca, M., Parra, I., Larran, M., & Martinez, I. (2005). The explanatory factors of intellectual capital disclosure to financial analysts. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 63–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Parra, M., Simo, P., Sallan, J. M., & Mundet, J. (2009). Intangible liabilities: Beyond models of intellectual assets. Management Decision, 47(5), 819–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M. (2013). Not all sunshine and roses: Discovering intellectual liabilities “in action”. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M., & Marasca, M. (2011). Construction and valuation of intellectual capital: A case study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. (1984, March). Investment incentives, debt and warrants. Journal of Financial Economics, 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1990, June). Capital structure and the informational role of debt. The Journal of Finance, 321–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1986, May). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–306. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/jensenmeckling.

  • Kristandl, G., & Bontis, N. (2007). The impact of voluntary disclosure on cost of equity capital estimates in a temporal setting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4), 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagrost, C., Martin, D., Dubois, C., & Quazzotti, S. (2010). Intellectual property valuation: How to approach the selection of an appropriate valuation method. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(4), 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H., & Pyle, D. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Macia, A. J., & Moeller, T. (2018, June 4). Intangible assets and capital structure. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2514551.

  • Long, M., & Malitz, I. (1985). Investment patterns and financial leverage. In B. M. Friedman (Ed.), Corporate capital structure in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maditinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., Tsairidis, C., & Theriou, G. (2011). The impact of intellectual capital on firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metha, A. D., & Madhani, P. M. (2008). Intangible assets—An introduction. The Accounting World, 8(9), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Visconti, R. (2012). Exclusive patents and trademarks and subsequent uneasy transaction comparability: Some transfer pricing implications. Intertax, 40(3), 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Visconti, R. (2013). Evaluating know-how for transfer price benchmarking. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moro Visconti, R. (2019). Combining network theory with corporate governance: Converging models for connected stakeholders. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(1), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, J., Bukh, P. N., & Marr, B. (2004). Reporting on intellectual capital: Why, what and how? Measuring Business Excellence, 8(1), 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C. (1977, November). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w1396.pdf?new_window=1.

  • Oestreicher, A. (2011). Valuation issues in transfer pricing of intangibles: Comments on the scoping of an OECD project. Intertax, 39(3), 126–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roslender, R., & Fincham, R. (2001). Thinking critically about intellectual capital accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(4), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salinas, G., & Ambler, T. (2009). A taxonomy of brand valuation practice: Methodologies and purposes. Journal of Brand Management, 17(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. P. (2013). On the intricacies of cash flow corporate valuation. Advances in Management, 6(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., & Kansal, M. (2011). Voluntary disclosures of intellectual capital: An empirical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. W., & Warner, J. (1979). On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2), 117–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988, March). The Determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valladares Soler, L. E., & Cuello De Oro, C. D. J. (2007). Evaluating the scope of IC in firms’ value. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 470–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanacker, T. R., & Manigart, S. (2010). Pecking order and debt capacity considerations for high-growth companies seeking financing. Small Business Economics, 35(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., & Yeung, C. K. A. (2012). Firm growth type and capital structure persistence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3427–3443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Moro Visconti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moro Visconti, R. (2020). Corporate Governance Concerns and Bankability Issues of the Intangible Assets: More Guarantees with Less Collateral?. In: The Valuation of Digital Intangibles. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36918-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36918-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36917-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36918-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics