Abstract
This chapter reports on a study of two cohorts on a postgraduate course in educational technology. Networked learners work in groups of 5–6 to complete a series of complex learning tasks that require them to build and steward a ‘digital habitat’ (Wenger et al.: Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities. Portland, CPSquare, 2009): a configuration of informational, technological and social resources that help group members meet their shared learning needs. The records of the groups’ online discussions are analysed to reveal how learners make a series of ongoing judgements and validations to negotiate and collectively construct the digital habitat and the practices they need to effectively use it. These practices emerge from a nexus of practice in which various flows of information and power intersect, and practices emerge as a consequence of both the power asserted by the institution and tutor, and also from student resistance to this power, in the sense proposed by Michel Foucault. The power inherent in the assessment regime gives the emerging practices a visibility that is essential to learning in this setting. While these small groups should not be idealised as decision-making fora, they remain social sites in which students can learn to build and steward a digital habitat.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
D. Ayling, E. Flagg, Getting Stuck in: Learners Participation in an Online Community of Practice. New Zealand Association for Cooperative Education 2012 Conference Proceedings, pp. 31–37, 2012
S. Brookfield, The Power of Critical Theory for Adult Learning and Teaching (Open University Press, Maidenhead, 2005)
A. Davidson, I. Gulka, A. Valle, C. Castonguay, Technology stewarding as a medium to develop and sustain niche online communities, in Educational, Psychological, and Behavioral Considerations in Niche Online Communities, ed. by V. Venkatesh, J. Wallin, C. Castro, E. Lewis, (IGI Global, Hershey, 2014), pp. 228–247
N.B. Dohn, Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 4, 343–363 (2009)
D.A. Druckenmiller, D. Mittleman, A Design Theory for Digital Habitats: Building Virtual Communities of Practice. 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2015), https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.75
M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Penguin, London, 1977)
N. Fraser, Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy, in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. by C. Calhoun, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992), pp. 109–142
J. Gastil, Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making and Communication (New Society, Philadelphia, 1993)
S. Gherardi, D. Nicolini, F. Odella, Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations: the notion of situated curriculum. Manag. Learn. 29(3), 273–297 (1998)
M.R. Gibbs, G. Wadley, S. Ng, Using ‘Simple’ Technology to Support Geographically Distributed Communities of Practice. IEEE 2012 Conference on Technology and Society in Asia, 2012
J. Gillen, D. Barton, Digital Literacies: A research Briefing by the Technology Enhanced Learning Phase of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme (London Knowledge Lab, London, 2010). http://www.tlrp.org/docs/DigitalLiteracies.pdf
P. Goodyear, L. Carvalho, N.B. Dohn, Artefacts and activities in the analysis of learning networks, in Research, Boundaries and Policy in Networked Learning, ed. by T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, M. de Laat, (Springer, New York, 2016), pp. 93–110
L. Gourlay, M. Oliver, It’s not all about the learner: reframing students’ digital literacy as sociomaterial practice, in Research, Boundaries and Policy in Networked Learning, ed. by T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, M. de Laat, (Springer, New York, 2016), pp. 77–92
J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Reason and the Rationalization of Society, vol 1 (Heinemann, London, 1984)
V. Hodgson, M. Reynolds, Consensus, difference and ‘multiple communities’ in networked learning. Stud. High. Educ. 30(1), 11–24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507052000307768
A. Hui, T. Schatzki, E. Shove, The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners (Routledge, London, 2017)
G. Kendall, G. Wickham, Using Foucault’s Methods (Sage, London, 1999)
D. Laurillard, Rethinking University Teaching, 2nd edn. (Routledge, London, 2002)
R. Luckin, Redesigning Learning Contexts (Routledge, London, 2010)
G. Parchoma, Traces of cognition as a distributed phenomenon in networked learning, in Networked Learning: Reflections and Challenges, ed. by N. B. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J. Sime, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, (Springer, New York, 2018), pp. 23–38
L. Perriton, M. Reynolds, ‘Here be dragons’: approaching difficult group issues in networked learning, in The Design, Experience and Practice of Networked Learning, ed. by V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, (Springer, New York, 2014), pp. 109–126
C. Rossitto, C. Bogdan, K. Severinson-Eklundh, Understanding constellations of technologies in use in a collaborative nomadic setting. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 23, 137–161 (2014)
C. Sauvagnac, P. Falzon, Collaboration and underlying issues or the surprises of cooperative dialogues. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 5, 251–266 (1996)
J.C. Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1990)
S. Timmis, G. Williams, Transitioning across networked, workplace and educational boundaries: Shifting identities and chronotopic movements, in Research, Boundaries and Policy in Networked Learning, ed. by T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, M. de Laat, (Springer, New York, 2016), pp. 111–124
L. Webster, A. Whitworth, Distance learning and alterity: facilitating the experience of variation and professional information practice. J. Inf. Lit. 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.11645/11.2.2231
E. Wenger, N. White, J. Smith, Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities (Portland, CPSquare, 2009)
A. Whitworth, Radical Information Literacy: Reclaiming the political heart of the IL movement (Chandos, Oxford, 2014)
Acknowledgements
Thanks also to Professor Helen Gunter for her input to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whitworth, A., Webster, L. (2020). Stewarding and Power in Networked Learning. In: Dohn, N., Jandrić, P., Ryberg, T., de Laat, M. (eds) Mobility, Data and Learner Agency in Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36911-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36911-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36910-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36911-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)