Abstract
This chapter explores the potential for the development of new learning opportunities in higher education, through students being conceptualised not as consumers, recipients or commodities, but rather as co-researchers and co-producers of knowledge. It discusses the implications of new forms of networked knowledge enabled by the emergence of semantic web and linked data technologies, and the reconceptualisation of the Internet as a ‘global data space’. These approaches have the potential to allow students to engage critically with existing data and data practices, generate new data and, perhaps more significantly, to participate in local or global knowledge networks. These activities involve not only the development of specific techno-literacies, but also broader critical digital literacies of which we offer examples and propose a number of dimensions. A critical digital literacies perspective, particularly when combined with the idea of students as co-researchers and co-producers, provides a basis for student to undertake critical and politicised inquiry as part of a broader reframing of the purposes of higher education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
R. Alquati, Per Fare Conricerca (Calusca Edizione, Torino, 1993)
R. Barnett, Learning for an unknown future. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 31(1), 65–77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642841
H. Batatia, K. Hakkarainen, A. Mørch, Tacit knowledge and trialogical learning: towards a conceptual framework for designing innovative tools, in Collaborative Knowledge Creation, ed. by A. Moen, A. Mørch, S. Paavola, (Sense, Rotterdam, 2012)
P. Brooks, Dancing with the Web: students bring meaning to the semantic web. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 21(2), 189–212 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2012.697400
D. Buckingham, Defining digital literacy: what do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic J. Digit. Lit.10, 21–34 (2015).
J. Calzada Prado, M.Á. Marzal, Incorporating data literacy into information literacy programs: core competencies and contents. Libri 63(2) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0010
P. Carmichael, Not just about gadgets: time, innovation and change in the design of learning technologies. E-Learn. Digit. Media 12(3–4), 279–294 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753015571052
P. Carmichael, K. Litherland, Transversality and innovation: prospects for technology-enhanced learning in times of crisis, in Surviving Economic Crises through Education, ed. by D. Cole, (Peter Lang, New York, 2012)
P. Carmichael, M. Tscholl, Cases, simulacra and semantic web technologies. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 29(1), 31–42 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00459.x
H. Cleaver, Reading Capital Politically (University of Texas Press, Austin, 1979)
H. Cleaver, Self-valorization in Mariarosa Dalla Costa’s “Women and the Subversion of the Community” (2011), Retrieved from https://la.utexas.edu/users/hcleaver/357k/HMCDallaCostaSelfvalorization2.htm
M. Conde, Activism mobilising science. Ecol. Econ. 105, 67–77 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.012
L. Czerniewicz, Inequality as higher education goes online, in Networked Learning, ed. by N. B. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2018), pp. 95–106
M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, Celebrating the tenth networked learning conference: looking back and moving forward, in Networked Learning, (Springer International, Cham, 2018), pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74857-3_1
D. De Roure, The future of scholarly communications. Insights 27(3), 233–238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.171
N.B. Dohn, Implications for networked learning of the ‘practice’ side of social practice theories - a tacit-knowledge perspective, in The Design, Experience and Practice of Networked Learning, ed. by V. Hodgson, de Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2014), pp. 29–49
N.B. Dohn, J.-A. Sime, S. Cranmer, T. Ryberg, M. de Laat, Reflections and challenges in networked learning, in Networked Learning, ed. by N. B. Dohn, S. Cranmer, J.-A. Sime, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2018), pp. 187–212
N. Dyer-Witheford, Cyber-Marx: Cycles and Circuits of Struggle in High-technology Capitalism (University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL, 1999)
N. Dyer-Witheford, Cognitive capitalism and the contested campus, in Engineering Culture: On the Author as (Digital) Producer, ed. by G. Cox, J. Krysa, (Autonomedia, New York, 2005), pp. 71–93
R. Edwards, F. Tracy, K. Jordan, Mobilities, moorings and boundary making in developing semantic technologies in educational practices. Res. Learn. Technol. 19(3), 219–232 (2011)
J. Gillen, D. Barton, Digital Literacies (London Knowledge Lab/TLRP, London, 2010)
P. Gilster, Digital Literacy (Wiley Computer, New York, 1997)
P. Goodyear, L. Carvalho, N.B. Dohn, Artefacts and activities in the analysis of learning networks, in Research, Boundaries, and Policy in Networked Learning, ed. by T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, M. de Laat, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 93–110
A. Gorz, Detruire l’université. Les Temps Modernes 285, 1553–1558 (1970)
L. Gourlay, M. Oliver, Beyond ‘the social’: digital literacies as sociomaterial practice, in Literacy in the Digital University: Critical Perspectives on Learning, Scholarship and Technology, ed. by R. Goodfellow, M. Lea, (Routledge, Abington, 2013)
L. Gourlay, M. Oliver, It’s not all about the learner: reframing students’ digital literacy as sociomaterial practice, in Research, Boundaries, and Policy in Networked Learning, ed. by S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 77–92
A. Haider, A. Mohandesi, Workers’ inquiry: a genealogy. Viewpoints 3 (2013). Retrieved from https://www.viewpointmag.com/2013/09/27/workers-inquiry-a-genealogy/
K. Hakkarainen, T. Palonen, S. Paavola, E. Lehtinen, Communities of Networked Expertise: Professional and Educational Perspectives (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004)
M. Healey, A. Jenkins, Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry (Higher Education Academy, York, 2009)
T. Heath, C. Bizer, Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global data Space. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 1(1), 1–136 (2011)
V. Hodgson, D. McConnell, L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, in The Theory, Practice and Pedagogy of Networked Learning, ed. by L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, D. McConnell, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2012), pp. 291–306
D. Huynh, D. Karger, R. Miller, Exhibit: lightweight structured data publishing. Proceedings from WWW ‘07: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Alberta, Canada New York, NY, USA, 2007
I. Illich, Deschooling Society (Marion Boyars, London, 1971)
I. Illich, The Right to Useful Unemployment and its Professional Enemies (Marion Boyars, London, 1978)
M. Jaakkola, Teacher Heutagogy in the Network Society: a framework for critical reflection, in Critical Learning in Digital Networks, ed. by P. Jandrić, D. Boras, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2015), pp. 163–178
P. Jandrić, The methodological challenge of networked learning: (post)disciplinarity and critical emancipation, in Research, Boundaries, and Policy in Networked Learning, ed. by T. Ryberg, C. Sinclair, S. Bayne, M. de Laat, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 165–182
C. Jones, Networked Learning: a Paradigm for the Age of Digital Networks (Springer, Dordrecht, 2015)
K. Jordan, H. Griffiths, K. Johnstone, An interactive timeline of plant evolution - a HEA Bioscience case study (2010), Retrieved from http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/casestudies/jordan.pdf
S. Koseoglu, A. Koutropoulos, Teaching Presence in MOOCs: Perspectives and Learning Design Strategies. Proceedings from Networked Learning Conference 2016, Lancaster, 9-11 May 2016
G. Kress, The profound shift of digital literacies, in Digital Literacies, ed. by J. Gillen, D. Barton, (London Knowledge Lab/TLRP, London, 2010), pp. 6–7
C. Lankshear, D. Knobel, Digital Literacies: concepts, policies and practices (Peter Lang, New York, 2008)
K. Litherland, G. Forrester, Undergraduates as co-producers of a history of education timeline. Proceedings from BERA Conference, Brighton, 3–5, September 2013
J.-F. Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1984)
E.B. Mandinach, E.S. Gummer, A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educ. Res. 42(1), 30–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12459803
A. Martinez-Garcia, F. Tracy, M. Tscholl, S. Morris, P. Carmichael, Case based learning, pedagogical innovation and semantic web technologies. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 5(2), 104–116 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2011.34
P. McLaren, P. Jandrić, The critical challenge of networked learning: using information technologies in the service of humanity, in Critical Learning in Digital Networks, ed. by P. Jandrić, D. Boras, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2015), pp. 199–226
S. Milan, Data activism as the new frontier of media activism, in Media Activism in the Digital Age: Charting an Evolving Field of Research, ed. by G. Yang, V. Pickard, (Routledge, Abingdon, 2016)
S. Milan, L. Van der Velden, The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digit. Cult. Soc. 2(2), 57–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
S. Morris, Semantic Web Use Cases and Case Studies: Using the Semantic Web to Enhance the Teaching of Dance (2012), Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/LJMU/LJMU.pdf
M. Neary, Student as producer: a pedagogy for the avant-garde? Learn. Exch. 1(1) (2010). Retrieved from http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/4186/
M. Neary, Student as producer: an institution of the common? [or how to recover communist/revolutionary science]. Enhancing Learn. Soc. Sci. 4(3), 1–16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2012.04030003
M. Neary, A. Hagyard, Pedagogy of excess: an alternative political economy of student life, in The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, (Routledge, Abingdon, 2010), pp. 209–244
M. Neary, J. Winn, The student as producer: reinventing the student experience in higher education, in The Future of Higher Education: Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience, ed. by L. Bell, H. Stevenson, M. Neary, (Continuum, London, 2009), pp. 192–210
M. Neary, J. Winn, Beyond public and private: a framework for co-operative higher education. Open Libr. Humanit. 3(2), 1–36 (2017). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.195
M. Neary, G. Saunders, A. Hagyard, D. Derricott, Research-engaged Teaching: an institutional strategy (Higher Education Academy, York, 2014)
A. Negri, From the Factory to the Metropolis (Polity Press, Cambridge, 2018)
S. Paavola, L. Lipponen, K. Hakkarainen, Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(4), 557–576 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004557
L. Pangrazio, N. Selwyn, ‘Personal data literacies’: a critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media Soc. 21(2), 419–437 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
C.K. Pereira, S.W.M. Siqueira, B.P. Nunes, S. Dietze, Linked data in education: a survey and a synthesis of actual research and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 11(3), 400–412 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2017.2787659
J. Raffaghelli, Open Data for Learning: A case study in Higher Education. Proceedings from European Distance and E-Learning Network, Genoa, 17–20 June 2018
G. Roggero, The autonomy of the living knowledge in the metropolis-university. Transversal, 2007(5) (2007). Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/0707/roggero/en
G. Roggero, The Production of Living Knowledge: The Crisis of the University and the Transformation of Labour in Europe and North America (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2011)
A. Sfard, On two metaphors for learning and on the dangers of choosing just one. Educ. Res. 27(2), 4–13 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
F. Tracy, P. Carmichael, Disrupting the dissertation: linked data, enhanced publication and algorithmic culture. E-Learn. Digit. Media 14(3), 164–182 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017731356
A. Wardrop, D. Withers (eds.), The Para-Academic Handbook (Hammer-On Press, Bristol, 2014)
B. Williamson, Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. J. Educ. Policy 31(2), 123–141 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758
S. Wright, Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism (Pluto Press, London, 2002)
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a grant from the UK ESRC/EPSRC Teaching Enhanced Learning Programme (http://www.tlrp.org/tel/) under research award RES-139-25-0403A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carmichael, P., Tracy, F. (2020). Networks of Knowledge, Students as Producers, and Politicised Inquiry. In: Dohn, N., Jandrić, P., Ryberg, T., de Laat, M. (eds) Mobility, Data and Learner Agency in Networked Learning. Research in Networked Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36911-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36911-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36910-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36911-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)