Abstract
According to Feyerabend (1970a) most scientific theories are not consistent with all known facts (p. 43). Consequently, if we tell students to accept only those theories which are consistent with the available and accepted facts, we shall be left without any theory. To solve this dilemma, Feyerabend suggested a change in methodology by admitting counterinduction, namely accepting unsupported hypotheses. According to Kalman (2019b): “Counterinduction is the process by which one theory or idea is used to effect change in its rival.” Furthermore, all scientists working in a field of knowledge do not necessarily agree with respect to all “observations”, “experimental results” and “theories.” Such views may be considered as “apocalyptic” by some and Feyerabend himself as the worst enemy of science, who still paid the following tribute to science, “Science gives us theories of high beauty and sophistication. Modern science has developed mathematical structures which exceed anything that has existed so far in coherence and generality” (Feyerabend, 1970a, p. 42).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aarriassecq, I., & Greca, I. M. (2007). Approaches to the teaching of special relativity theory in high school and university textbooks. Science & Education, 16(1), 65–86.
Abrams, G. S., & Perl, M. L. (1979). Measurement of the branching fraction for tau ➔ rho nu. Physics Review Letters, 43, 1555–1558.
Achinstein, P. (1987). Scientific discovery and Maxwell’s kinetic theory. Philosophy of Science, 54, 409–434.
Arabatzis, T., & Gavroglu, K. (2015). That the Michelson-Morley experiment paved the way for the special theory of relativity. In R. L. Numbers & K. Kampourakis (Eds.), Newton’s apple and other myths about science (pp. 149–156). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bensaude-Vincent, B. (1986). Mendeleev’s periodic system of chemical elements. British Journal for the History of Science, 19, 3–17.
Bodner, G. & Pardue, H. (1989). Chemistry: An experimental science. New York: Wiley.
Bohr, N. (1913). On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Part I. Philosophical Magazine, 26(series 6), 1–25.
Bray, W. C., & Branch, G. E. K. (1913). Valence and tautomerism. Journal of American Chemical Society, 35, 1440–1447.
Brito, A., Rodríguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2005). A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 84–111.
Brush, S. G. (1976). The kind of motion we call heat: A history of the kinetic theory of gases in the 19th century. New York: North-Holland.
Brush, S. G. (1996). The reception of Mendeleev’s periodic law in America and Britain. Isis, 87, 595–628.
Brush, S. G. (2000). Thomas Kuhn as a historian of science. Science & Education, 9, 39–58.
Cavalli-Sforza, M., Goggi, G., Mantovani, G. C., Piazzoli, A., Rossini, B., Scannicchio, D., et al. (1976). Anomalous production of high-energy muons in e+e- collisions at 4.8 GeV. Physics Review Letters, 36, 558–561.
Clark, P. (1976). Atomism and thermodynamics. In C. Howson (Ed.), Method and appraisal in the physical sciences: The critical background to modern science, 1800–1905 (pp. 41–105). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Presss.
Clausius, R. (1857). On the nature of the motion we call heat. Philosophical Magazine, 14, 108–127.
Cooper, L. N. (1970). An introduction to the meaning and structure of physics (short edn). New York: Harper & Row.
Cowan, C. L., et al. (1956). Detection of the free neutrino: A confirmation. Science, 124, 103–104.
Crease, R. M. (2002). Critical point: The most beautiful experiment. Physics World, 15(9), 19–20.
Crowther, J. G. (1910). Proceedings of the Royal Society (Vol. lxxxiv). London: Royal Society.
Darrigol, O. (2009). A simplified genesis of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 151–166.
Davisson, C., & Germer, L. H. (1927). Diffraction of electrons by a crystal of Nickel. Physical Review, 30(6), 705–740.
De Broglie, L. (1922). Journal de Physique, 3 (Series VI), 422.
De Broglie, L. (1923a). Ondes et quanta. Comptes Rendus, 177, 507–510, 548–550, 630–632.
De Broglie, L. (1923b). Waves and quanta. Nature, 112, 540.
De Broglie, L. (1924). A tentative theory of light quanta. Philosophical Magazine, 47(Series 6), 446–458.
De Milt, C. (1951). The congress at Karlsruhe. Journal of Chemical Education, 28, 421–425.
Dickerson, R., Gray, H., Darensbourg, M. & Darensbourg, D. (1984). Chemical principles (4th ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Duhem, P. (1914). The aim and structure of physical theory (2nd ed., & P. P. Wiener, Trans.). New York: Atheneum (First published in 1905).
Einstein, A. (1905). Über einen erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuristischen gesichtspunkt. Annalen de Physik, 17, 132–148.
Einstein, A. (1916). Zur quantentheorie der strahlung. Zürich Mitteilungen, 18, 47–62.
Feldman, G. J., & Perl, M. L. (1977). Inclusive anomalous muon production in e+e- annihilation. Physics Review Letters, 38, 117–120.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1970a). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. IV, pp. 17–130). Mineapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1970b). Problems of empiricism, Part II. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), The nature and function of scientific theories (pp. 275–353). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1970c). Consolations for the specialist. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 197–230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1970d). Classical empiricism. In R. E. Butts & J. W. Davis (Eds.), The methodological heritage of Newton (pp. 150–170). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975a). Against method. Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. Londond: New Left Books.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1993). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge (3rd Rev and enlarged edn). New York: Verso.
Feyerabend, P. K. (2011). The tyranny of science. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press (Based on Trent lectures delivered in 1992).
Garber, E., Brush, S. G., & Everitt, C. W. F. (Eds.). (1986). Maxwell on molecules and gases. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gavroglu, K. (2000). Controversies and the becoming of physical chemistry. In P. Machamer, M. Pera, & A. Baltas (Eds.), Scientific controversies: Philosophical and historical perspectives (pp. 177–198). New York: Oxford University Press.
Geiger, H., & Marsden, E. (1909). On a diffuse reflection of the alpha particles. In Proceedings of the Royal Society (Vol. lxxxii). London: Royal Society.
Giere, R. N. (2006a). Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giere, R. N. (2006b). Perspectival pluralism. In S. H. Kellert, H. E. Longino, & C. K. Waters (Eds.), Scientific pluralism (pp. 26–41). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Goldberg, D. (2001). Fundamentals of chemistry (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gordin, M. D. (2004). A well-ordered thing: Dmitrii Mendeleev and the shadow of the periodic table. New York: Basic Books.
Grosser, M. (1962). The discovery of Neptune. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Reprint, New York: Dover, 1979).
Halliday, D. & Resnick, R. (1981). Fundamentals of Physics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, N. R. (1964). On the structure of physical knowledge. In S. Elam (Ed.), Education and the structure of knowledge (pp. 148–187). Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
Hecht, E. (2003). Physics: Algebra/Trig (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
Heilbron, J. L. (1981b). Historical studies in the theory of atomic structure. New York: Arno Press.
Heilbron, J. L., & Kuhn, T. (1969). The genesis of the Bohr atom. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 1, 211–290.
Hertz, H. (1883). Versuche über die Glimmentladung. Annalen der Physik, 19, 782–816.
Hertz, H. (1887). Ueber einen Einfluss des Ultravioletten Lichtes auf die Elektrische Entladung. Annalen der Physik, 31, 983–1000.
Hill, J. & Petrucci, R. (1999). General chemistry: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Holton, G. (1969a). Einstein and “crucial” experiments. American Journal of Physics, 37(10), 968–982.
Holton, G. (1969b). Einstein, Michelson and the “crucial” experiment. Isis, 60, 133–197.
Holton, G. (1978a). Subelectrons, presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft dispute. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 9, 161–224.
Holton, G. (1978b). On the educational philosophy of the Project Physics Course. In G. Holton (Ed.), The scientific imagination (pp. 294–298). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holton, G. (1986). The advancement of science and its burdens. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Holton, G. (1992). Ernst Mach and the fortunes of positivism in America. Isis, 83, 27–60.
Holton, G. (1993). Science and anti-science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holton, G. (1999). R.A. Millikan’s struggle with the meaning of Planck’s constant. Physics in Perspective, 1, 231–237.
Holton, G. (2000). Personal communication, September 25.
Holton, G. (2014a). The neglected mandate: Teaching science as part of our culture. Science & Education, 23, 1875–1877.
Holton, G. (2014b). Personal communication, August 3, italics in the original.
Holtzclaw, H.F., & Robinson, W.R. (1988). General chemistry (8th ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath
Jammer, M. (1966). The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Joesten, M., Johnston, D., Netterville, J. & Wood, J. (1991). World of chemistry. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Kalman, C. S. (2019b). Personal communication to author, February 26, reproduced with permission.
Kitchener, R. F. (1993). Piaget’s epistemic subject and science education: Epistemological versus psychological issues. Science & Education, 2, 137–148.
Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Klassen, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, 37, 31–62.
Kohler, R. E. (1971). The origin of Lewis’s theory of the shared pair bond. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3, 343–376.
Kragh, H. (1999). Quantum generations: A history of physics in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krane, K. S. (1996). Modern physics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–195). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, R., Laudan, L., & Donovan, A. (1988). Testing theories of scientific change. In A. Donovan, L. Laudan, & R. Laudan (Eds.), Scrutinizing science: Empirical studies of scientific change (pp. 3–44). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Lewis, G. N. (1916). The atom and the molecule. Journal of American Chemical Society, 38, 762–785.
Lewis, G. N. (1919). Letter to Robert Millikan (Reproduced in Kohler, 1971).
Lewis, G. N. (1923). Valence and the structure of atoms and molecules. New York: Chemical Catalog.
Lorentz, H. A. (1895). Versuch einer theorie de electrischen und optischen erscheinunungen in bewegten Körpern (collected papers, vol. 5). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
Lippincott, W.T., Garrett, A. & Verhoek, F. (1968). Chemistry: A study of matter (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Margenau, H. (1950). The nature of physical reality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Matthews, M. R. (1987). Experiment as the objectification of theory: Galileo’s revolution. In Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 289–298). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Maxwell, J. C. (1860). Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases. Philosophical Magazine, 19, 19–32 (Reproduced in Scientific Papers, 1965, pp. 377–409, New York: Dover).
Mayo, D. G. (1988). Brownian motion and the appraisal of theories. In A. Donovan, L. Laudan, & R. Laudan (Eds.), Scrutinizing science: Empirical studies of scientific change (pp. 219–243). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
McMullin, E. (1985). Galilean idealization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 16, 247–273.
McMurry, J. & Fay, R. (2001). Chemistry (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Medicus, H. A. (1974). Fifty years of matter waves. Physics Today, 27, 38–45.
Mendeleev, D. (1869). Ueber die beziehungen der eigenschaften zu den atom gewichten der elemente. Zeitschrift für Chemie, 12, 405–406.
Mendeleev, D. (1879). The periodic law of the chemical elements. The Chemical News, 40, No. 1042.
Mendeleev, D. (1889). The periodic law of the chemical elements. Journal of the Chemical Society, 55, 634–656 (Faraday lecture, delivered on 4 June 1889).
Mendeleev, D. (1897). The principles of chemistry (2nd English ed., trans. of 6th Russian ed.). New York: American Home Library Company.
Michelson, A. A. (1927). Studies in optics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Michelson, A. A., & Morley, E. W. (1887). On the relative motion of the earth and the luminiferous ether. American Journal of Science, 34(3rd series), 333–345.
Miller, D. C. (1925). Science, 61, 617.
Miller, D. C. (1933). The ether-drift experiment and the determination of the absolute motion of the earth. Review of Modern Physics, 5, 204–242.
Millikan, R. A. (1913). On the elementary electrical charge and the Avogadro constant. Physical Review, 2, 109–143.
Millikan, R. A. (1916). A direct photoelectric determination of Planck’s “h”. Physical Review, 7, 355–388.
Moore, J.W., Stanitski, C.L. & Jurs, P. C. (2002). Chemistry: The molecular science. Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
Moseley, H. G. J. (1913). High frequency spectra of the elements. Philosophical Magazine, 26, 1025–1034.
Moseley, H. G. J. (1914). High frequency spectra of the elements. Part II. Philosophical Magazine, 27, 703–713.
Motterlini, M. (1999). Ed. For and against method: Including Lakatos’s lectures on scientific method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend correspondence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Niaz, M. (1993). If Piaget’s epistemic subject is dead, shall we bury the scientific methodology of idealization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 809–812.
Niaz, M. (2000a). A rational reconstruction of the kinetic molecular theory of gases based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Instructional Science, 28, 23–50.
Niaz, M. (2000b). The oil drop experiment: A rational reconstruction of the Millikan-Ehrenhaft controversy and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 480–508.
Niaz, M. (2001). A rational reconstruction of the origin of the covalent bond and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 623–641.
Niaz, M. (2005). An appraisal of the controversial nature of the oil-drop experiment: Is closure possible? British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 56, 681–702.
Niaz, M. (2012). From ‘science in the making’ to understanding the nature of science: An overview for science educators. New York: Routledge.
Niaz, M. (2015). That the Millikan oil-drop experiment was simple and straightforward. In R. L. Numbers & K. Kampourakis (Eds.), Newton’s apple and other myths about science (pp. 157–163). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Niaz, M. (2016). Chemistry education and contributions from history and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Niaz, M. (2017). Relationship between domain-specific and domain-general aspects of nature of science in science textbooks. In C. V. McDonald & F. Abd-El-Khalick (Eds.), Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks (pp. 61–78). New York: Routledge.
Niaz, M., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Benarroch, A., Cardellini, L., Laburu, C. E., Marín, N., et al. (2003). Constructivism: Defense or a continual critical appraisal — A response to Gil-Pérez, et al. Science & Education, 12(8), 787–797.
Niaz, M., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., & Metz, D. (2010). Reconstruction of the history of the photoelectric effect and its implications for general physics textbooks. Science Education, 94, 903–931.
Niaz, M., & Luiggi, M. (2014). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of the periodic table. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Niaz, M., & Marcano, C. (2012). Reconstruction of wave-particle duality and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Niaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011). Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Niaz, M., & Rivas, M. (2016). Students’ understanding of research methodology in the context of dynamics of scientific progress. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Niaz, M., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2001). Do we have to introduce history and philosophy of science or is it already “inside” chemistry? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 159–164.
Niaz, M., Rodríguez, M. A., & Brito, A. (2004). An appraisal of Mendeleev’s contribution to the development of the periodic table. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 35, 271–282.
Nola, R. (1997). Constructivism in science and science education: A philosophical critique. Science & Education, 6, 55–83.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949.
Olenick, R. P., Apostol, T. M., & Goodstein, D. L. (1985). Beyond the mechanical universe. From electricity to modern physics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ospina, J. (2010). Efecto fotoeléctrico: Una reconstrucción racional basada en la historia y filosofía de la ciencia y sus implicaciones para los textos de química general. Master of Science Thesis (chemistry education), Cumaná, Venezuela: Universidad de Oriente.
Pais, A. (1982). “Subtle is the Lord …” The science and the life of Albert Einstein. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Perl, M. L. (1997). Reflections on the discovery of the Tau Lepton. In G. Ekspong (Ed.), Nobel lectures, physics 1991–1995 (pp. 168–195). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. (Nobel prize acceptance speech delivered on December 8, 1995).
Perl, M. L. (2004). The discovery of the Tau Lepton and the changes in elementary-particle physics in forty years. Physics in Perspective, 6, 401–427.
Perl, M. L. (2007). A contrarian view of how to develop creativity in science and engineering. Paper presented at The Eighth Olympiad of the Mind, The National Academies, Washington, DC, November (SLAC-PUB-12850).
Perl, M. L., Abrams, G. S., Boyarski, A. M., Breidenbach, M., Briggs, D. D., Bulos, F., et al. (1975). Evidence for anomalous lepton production in e+-e- annihilation. Physics Review Letters, 35, 1489–1492.
Perrin, J. (1923). Atoms (D. L. Hammick, Trans.). London: Constable.
PLUTO-Collaboration, et al. (1977). Anomalous muon production e+e- annihilations as evidence for heavy leptons. Physics Letters B, 68, 297–300.
Polanyi, M. (1964). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper & Row (First published 1958 by the University of Chicago Press).
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.
Popper, K. R. (1963a). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ramsay, W. (1897). An undiscovered gas (address to the Section of Chemical Sciences of the British Association). Nature, 56, 378–382.
Ramsay, W., & Travers, M. W. (1901). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 197, 47.
Reines, F. (1997). The neutrino: From poltergeist to particle. In G. Ekspong (Ed.), Nobel lectures, physics, 1991–1995 (pp. 202–221). Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co..
Rodebush, W. H. (1928). The electron theory of valence. Chemical Review, 5, 509–531.
Rodríguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2004). A reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for general physics textbooks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 409–424.
Rucker, W. A., & Kelvin, L. (1895). Contribution to untitled comments. Chemical News, 71(1836), 62.
Rutherford, E. (1911). The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine, 21, 669–688.
Rutherford, E. (1915). The constitution of matter and the evolution of the elements. In Address to the annual meeting of the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 167–202). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
Sandin, T. R. (1989). Modern physics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Sears, F.W., Zemansky, M.W. & Young, H.D. (1991). College Physics (7th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Segal, B. (1989). Chemistry: Experiment and theory ( 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Serway, R. A. (1996). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics (4th ed., Spanish). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shankland, R. S. (1963). Conversations with Albert Einstein. American Journal of Physics, 31, 47–57.
Shankland, R. S. (1964). The Michelson-Morley experiment. American Journal of Physics, 32, 23.
Shapere, D. (1977). Scientific theories and their domains. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed., pp. 518–565). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Sisler, H., Dresdner, R. & Mooney, W. (1980). Chemistry: A systematic approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smart, W. M. (1946). John Couch Adams and the discovery of Neptune. Nature, 158, 648–652.
Thomson, J. J. (1897). Cathode rays. Philosophical Magazine, 44, 293–316.
Thomson, J. J. (1907). The corpuscular theory of matter. London: Constable.
Thomson, J. J. (1914). The forces between atoms and chemical affinity. Philosophical Magazine, 27, 757–789.
Van Spronsen, J. (1969). The periodic system of chemical elements. A history of the first hundred years. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1968). Conceptual foundations of scientific thought: An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Macmillan.
Weisberg, M. (2007). Who is a modeler? British Joural for the Philosophy of Science, 58, 207–233.
Wheaton, B. R. (1983). The tiger and the shark: Empirical roots of wave-particle dualism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D. (1983). Rutherford: Simple genius. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niaz, M. (2020). Feyerabend’s Counterinduction and Science Textbooks. In: Feyerabend’s Epistemological Anarchism. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36858-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36859-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)