Advertisement

The Errors Clausewitz Made About Culture in War (and How a Clausewitzian Approach Can Solve Them)

Chapter
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

Arguments aimed at undermining Clausewitz’s theories as too “state-centric” have carried the false idea that he excluded war’s cultural aspects from his analysis. In reality, Clausewitz wrote many thoughts on how different peoples fight, as well as the societal factors that affect morale among the troops and the population. This paper argues that Clausewitz did not understate the role of culture at all, but actually overstated it, falling at times outright into stereotyping. Luckily, despite these faults in his writings, he nonetheless bequeathed a rational tool to frame our notion of culture’s role in war in his famed “Wondrous Trinity.” Improving our overall grasp of Clausewitz through the lens of dialectical reasoning facilitates the task of extracting a cultural theory of war from his magnus opus that can be useful especially in fighting insurgencies whose claims to power are built on cultural re-appropriation and anti-colonialism.

Keywords

War theory Insurgency Cultural intelligence Military strategy 

References

  1. Avrich, P. (1968). Russian Anarchists and the Civil War. Russian Review, 27(3), 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakunin, M. (1953). Stateless socialism: Anarchism. In G. P. Maximoff (Ed.), The political philosophy of Bakunin. New York: The Free Press. Retrieved on May 18, 2016, https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bakunin/works/various/soc-anar.htm.Google Scholar
  3. Bassford, C. (2007). The primacy of policy and the ‘trinity’ in Clausewitz’s mature thought. In H. Strachan & A. Herberg-Rothe (Eds.), Clausewitz and the twenty-first century (pp. 74–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clausewitz, C. (1843). The campaign of 1812 (Ellesmere, Trans.). London: John Murray Publishers, 1843. Retrieved on May 17, 2019, https://www.clausewitz.com/readings/1812/Clausewitz-CampaignOf1812inRussia-EllesmereTranslation.pdf
  5. Clausewitz, C. (2004). On war. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
  6. Clausewitz, C. (2015). Clausewitz on small war (C. Daase, & J. Davis, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cormier, Y. (2016). War as paradox: Clausewitz and Hegel on fighting doctrines and ethics. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Government of Peru, Ministry of Defense. (2005). Libro blanco de la defensa nacional. Retrieved on December 15, 2018, https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/157095/Peru%202005_spanish.pdf
  9. Guibert, J. A. H. d. (1805). Essai géneral de tactique. Paris: Magimel.Google Scholar
  10. Herberg-Rothe, A. (2011). Clausewitz’s concept of the state. In A. Herberg-Rothe, J. W. Honig, & D. Moran (Eds.), Clausewitz, the state and war (pp. 17–28). Stuttgart/New York: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  11. Heuser, B. (2002). Reading Clausewitz. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  12. Jomini, A.-H. (1841). Précis de l’art de la guerre. Bruxelles: Librairie Militaire de JB PetiT.Google Scholar
  13. Kaldor, M. (2001). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Keegan, J. (1993). A history of warfare. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  15. Pape, R. (2003). The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paret, P. (1985). Clausewitz and the state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paret, P. (2014). Clausewitz in his time: Essays in the cultural and intellectual history of thinking about war. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  18. Rapoport, A. (1968). Introduction to On War, translated by J.J. Graham. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Préposiet, J. (2002). Histoire de l’anarchisme. Paris: Tallandier.Google Scholar
  20. Said, Edward. (2001, October 4). The clash of ignorance. The Nation.Google Scholar
  21. Scheipers, S. (2018). On small war: Carl von Clausewitz and people’s war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strachan, H., & Herberg-Rothe, A. (Eds.). (2007). Clausewitz and the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, L. (2006). Shining path: Guerrilla war in Peru’s northern highlands, 1980–1997. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  24. von Bülow, A. H. D. (1799). Geist des neuern Kriegssystems hergeleitet aus dem Grundsatze einer Basis der Operationen auch für Laien in der Kriegskunst faßlich vorgetragen von einem ehemaligen preußischen Offizier. Benjamin Gottlieb Hofmann: Hamburg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Conference of Defence Associations InstituteRoyal Military College of CanadaKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations