Advertisement

Anthropology in the Bunker: Teaching Transcultural War at the US Naval War College

Chapter
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

The military’s interest in anthropology follows predictable cycles in the US: anthropology holds interest when the military must fight land wars against adversaries from a different culture. In off-cycles, anthropology reverts back to the special operations community and survives as an academic subject in the world of professional military education (PME). In the US, PME institutions exist as a kind of reservoir for the concept of culture and for the discipline of anthropology. PME institutions keep the concept of culture alive within the military domain by retaining a smattering of anthropology in their curriculum. Under these conditions, a professor teaching anthropology to military personnel must focus on anthropology’s professional relevance, offering insights that might be applied to operational problems. This chapter describes my haphazard journey in developing an anthropology course for senior military personnel. I describe some of epistemological benefits offered by an anthropological approach (e.g., ‘ground up’ perspective, de-naturalization of taken-for-granted cultural norms, and subjective thinking), and my discovery of the limitations of anthropology and military history for theorizing about transcultural war. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the central question that emerged from the course: What happens when two ‘culturally distant’ societies go to war, each having their own norms and ideas regarding the organized deployment of military force?

Keywords

Military Anthropology Transcultural war Professional military education US Navy 

References

  1. Abler, T. (1992). Scalping, torture, cannibalism and rape: An ethnohistorical analysis of conflicting cultural values in war. Anthropologica, 34(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  3. Air War College. (2019). Faculty biographies. http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/tf_biographies.aspx
  4. Arndt, J. (2010). Treacherous savages and merciless barbarians: Knowledge, discourse and violence during the cape frontier wars, 1834 – 1853. Journal of Military History, 74(3), 709–735.Google Scholar
  5. Asad, T. (Ed.). (1973). Anthropology and the colonial encounter. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  6. Axtell, J. (1982). The European and the Indian: Essays in the ethnohistory of colonial North America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bashkow, I. (2004). A Neo-Boasian conception of cultural boundaries. American Anthropologist, 106(3), 433–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belich, J. (2015). The New Zealand wars and the victorian interpretation of racial conflict. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Black, J. (2000). War and the world: Military power and the fate of continents, 1450–2000. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Black, J. (1999). War and the world, 1450-2000. Journal of Military History, 63(3), 669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2009, July 15). Officer professional military education policy, 1800.01D. Washington, DC: CJCSGoogle Scholar
  12. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2015, May 29). Officer professional military education policy, 1800.01D. Washington, DC: CJCSGoogle Scholar
  13. Cumings, B. (2004). North Korea: Another country. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  14. Defense Manpower Data Center. (2019). DoD personnel workforce report. Retrieved from https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/dwp/dwp_reports.jsp
  15. Department of Defense. (2005, November). Directive 3000.05, military support for stability, security, transition, and reconstruction (SSTR) operations. Washington, DC: DOD.Google Scholar
  16. Devereux, G., & Loeb, E. (1943). Antagonistic acculturation. American Sociological Review, 8(2), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dohrenwend, B., & Smith, R. (1962). Toward a theory of acculturation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 18(1), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edgerton, R. (1965). Some dimensions of disillusionment in culture contact. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 21(3), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Embree, J. (1946). Micronesia: The Navy and democracy. Far Eastern Survey, 15(11), 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman, A. (1991). Formation of violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferguson, R. B., & Whitehead, N. (Eds.). (2000a). War in the tribal zone: Expanding states and indigenous warfare. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ferguson, R. B., & Whitehead, N. (2000b). The violent edge of empire. In R. B. Ferguson & N. Whitehead (Eds.), War in the tribal zone: Expanding states and indigenous warfare. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ferguson, R. B. (2000). A savage encounter: Western contact and the Yanomami war complex. In R. B. Ferguson & N. Whitehead (Eds.), War in the tribal zone: Expanding states and indigenous warfare. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  24. Freedberg Jr, S. (2012, July 02). Army makes case for funding culture skills beyond COIN. Breaking Defense. http://breakingdefense.com/2012/07/army-makes-case-for-culture-skills-beyond-coin/
  25. Foster, G. (1960). Culture and conquest. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
  26. Fry, D. (2007). Beyond war: The human potential for peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gat, A. (2008). War in human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Goodwin, G. (1971). Western Apache raiding and warfare. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gorer, G. (1943). The special case of Japan. Public Opinion Quarterly, 7(4), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross, D. (1975). Protein capture and cultural development in the Amazon Basin. American Anthropologist, 77(3), 526–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, M. (1971). Culture, man and nature. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  32. Harris, M. (2001). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. New York: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hartland, E. S. (1893). Report on folk-tale research, 1892. Folklore, 4(1), 80–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herskovits, M. (1938). Acculturation: The study of culture contact. New York: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
  35. Hirsch, A. (1988). The collision of military cultures in seventeenth-century New England. Journal of American History, 74(4), 1187–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoffman, F., & Davies, M. (2013, June 10). Joint force 2020 and the human domain: Time for a new conceptual framework? Small Wars Journal. http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/joint-force-2020-and-the-human-domain-time-for-a-new-conceptual-framework
  37. Judson, J. (2018, October 9). From multi-domain battle to multi-domain operations: Army evolves its guiding concept. Defense News.Google Scholar
  38. Kahn, J. (1989). Culture: Demise or resurrection? Critique of Anthropology, 9(2), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keegan, J. (1994). History of warfare. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  40. Keeley, L. (1997). War before civilization: The myth of the peaceful savage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kortüm, H. H. (Ed.). (2006). Transcultural wars from the middle age to the 21st century. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  42. Le Blanc, S. (2004). Constant battles: Why we fight. London: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  43. Little, A. (2001). “Shoot that rogue, for he hath an englishman’s coat on!”: Cultural cross-dressing on the New England frontier, 1620-1760. New England Quarterly, 74(2), 238–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mair, L. (1934). The study of culture contact as a practical problem. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 7(4), 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marine Corps University. (2019). Faculty directory. https://www.usmcu.edu/About-MCU/Faculty/Faculty-and-Staff-Directory/
  46. McFate, M. (2018). Military anthropology: Soldiers, scholars and subjects at the margins of empire. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McHugh, J. M. (2013, October 28). Memorandum on designation of PKSOI as the US Army’s lead as joint proponent for peacekeeping and stability operations.Google Scholar
  48. Meggers, B. J. (1971). Amazonia: Man and culture in a counterfeit paradise. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  49. Obama, B. (2010, December 16). Remarks on the strategy in Afghanistan. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/17/world/asia/17afghan-text.html
  50. Parker, G. (2007). Military revolution: Military innovation and the rise of the west. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 36(1), 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rivers, W. H. R. (1914). History of Melanesian society. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Scales, R. (2006, July 1) Clausewitz and world war IV. Armed Forces Journal. http://armedforcesjournal.com/clausewitz-and-world-war-iv/
  54. Scheper-Hughes, N., & Bourgois, P. (2003). Violence in war and peace: An anthology. New York: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Shelton, A. (1965). Anthropological “values” and culture change: A note. American Anthropologist, 67(1), 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Silliman, S. (2008). The “old west” in the Middle East: U.S. military metaphors in real and imagined Indian country. American Anthropologist, 110(2), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slobodin, R. (1997). W. H. R. Rivers: Pioneer anthropologist and psychiatrist of the “ghost road” (2nd ed.). Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Teske, R., Jr., & Nelson, B. (1974). Acculturation and assimilation: A clarification. American Ethnologist, 1(2), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turney-High, H. (1949). Primitive war: Its practices and concepts. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  60. Useem, J. (1945a). American pattern of military government in Micronesia. American Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Useem, J. (1945b). Governing the occupied areas of the South Pacific: War time lessons and peace time proposals. Applied Anthropology, 4(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
  62. US Army War College Deputy Provost. (2018, 7 December). [email]Google Scholar
  63. US Joint Special Operations University Public Affairs Office. (2018, December 19). [telephone communication]Google Scholar
  64. US National Defense University Director of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment. (2019, February 1). [email]Google Scholar
  65. US Naval Postgraduate School Public Affairs Office. (2018, December 19). [telephone communication]Google Scholar
  66. US Naval War College Associate Provost. (2018, December, 19). [email]Google Scholar
  67. US Special Operations Command. (2015, August 3). Operating in the human domain. Tampa: USSOCOMGoogle Scholar
  68. Wagner, G. (1936). The study of culture contact and the determination of policy. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 9(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wells, D., & Wilson, S. (Eds.). (1999). Russo-Japanese war in cultural perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. White House. (2017). National security strategy. Washington, DC: White House.Google Scholar
  71. Wolf, E. (1972). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.US Naval War CollegeNewportUSA

Personalised recommendations