Abstract
The chapter focuses on how school choice processes construct symbolic boundaries between student groups at two high schools in a Swedish urban city. Ash Public is an “immigrant school” on the city’s outskirts, and Beech Ltd. is a white middle-class school in the city center. The study analyzes how the relation between the schools’ student body composition, rumors, and ways of defining values and social characteristics structures the students’ feelings of belonging (or not belonging) to the specific school culture. The study shows that the constructions of “we” and “them” emerge as real obstacles for contacts between the Ash Public and Beech Ltd. students. Although their schools are located in the same city, they seem in many ways to be “worlds apart”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All names of places, schools, and individuals are fictional.
- 2.
The empirical data was collected in 2014 within the Swedish research project Inclusive and competitive? Working in the intersection between social inclusion and marketization in high school (2012–2015), financed by the Swedish Research Council.
- 3.
In upper secondary education in Sweden, there are 18 national programs: six higher education preparatory and 12 vocational. In addition, there are five introductory programs for students who are not eligible for a national program.
References
Alexander, J. C. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, J. C. (2013). Struggling Over the Mode of Incorporation: Backlash Against Multiculturalism in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(4), 531–556.
Asp Onsjö, L., & Holm, A.-S. (2014). Governance by Marks: An Ethnographic Study of School Achievements and Gender. In A. Arnesen, E. Lahelma, E. Öhrn, & L. Lundahl (Eds.), Fair and Competitive? Critical Perspectives on Contemporary Nordic Schooling (pp. 61–81). Tufnell Press.
Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I Heard It on the Grapevine’: Hot Knowledge and School Choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19, 377–400.
Barmark, M., & Lund, S. (2016). How School Choice Leads to Segregation: An Analysis of Structural Boundaries at Play. In E. Harvey (Ed.), Secondary Education: Perspectives, Global Issues and Challenges (pp. 67–86). New York: Nova Publisher.
Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2007). Education and the Commodity Problem: Ethnographic Investigations of Creativity and Performativity in Swedish Schools. London: Tufnell Press.
Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2009). Making Right Choices: An Ethnographic Investigation of Creativity and Performativity in Swedish Schools. Oxford Review of Education, 35(6), 689–704.
Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2011). Twelve Years of Upper-Secondary Education in Sweden: The Beginnings of a Neo-liberal Policy Hegemony? Educational Review, 64(4), 313–327.
Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2019). Equity and Choice for Newly Arrived Migrants. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education. Lessons from Sweden (pp. 33–48). New York: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (1999). Official Knowledge and Pedagogic Identities. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness. London: Continuum.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research and Critique (Rev. ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Böhlmark, A., Holmlund, H., & Lindahl, M. (2015). School Choice and Segregation: Evidence from Sweden. IFAU Working Paper 2015:8.
Bunar, A., & Ambrose, A. (2018). Urban polarisering och marknadens förlorare. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Skolan, marknaden och framtiden (pp. 169–185). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bunar, N. (2008). The Free Schools “Riddle”: Between Traditional Social Democratic, Neoliberal and Multicultural Tenets. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 423–438.
Bunar, N. (2010). The Controlled School Market and Urban Schools in Sweden. Journal of School Choice, 4(1), 47–73.
Dovemark, M. (2013). How Private ‘Everyday Racism’ and Public ‘Racism Denial’ Contribute to Unequal and Discriminatory Educational Experiences. Ethnography and Education, 8(1), 16–30.
Dovemark, M. (2017). Utbildning till salu: konkurrens, differentiering och varumärke. Utbildning & Demokrati, 26(1), 67–86.
Dovemark, M., & Holm, A.-S. (2015). Förortens skola – Möjligheternas skola? Utbildning & Lärande, 9(1), 62–79.
Dovemark, M., & Holm, A.-S. (2017). Pedagogic Identities for Sale. Segregation and Homogenizationin Swedish Upper Secondary School. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 518–532.
Fjellman, A.-M. (2019). School Choice, Space and the Geography of Marketization – Analyses of Educational Restructuring in Upper Secondary Educationin Sweden. Göteborgs Universitet. Acta: Gothenburgesis Universitatis.
Forsberg, H. (2018). Gymnasieval och segregation. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Skolan, marknaden och framtiden (pp. 203–225). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Gudmundsson, G., Beach, D., & Vestel, V. (Eds.). (2013). Youth and Marginalization. Young People from Immigrant Families in Scandinavia. London: Tufnell press.
Harling, M. (2019). School Fairs as the Market Place of Education. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education. Lessons from Sweden (pp. 170–182). New York: Routledge.
Hodkinson, P., & Sparkes, A. C. (1997). Careership: A Sociological Theory of Career Decision Making. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1), 29–44.
Holm, A.-S. (2013). A Sea of Options. Student Perspectives on Market Competition in Upper-secondary Schools in Sweden. Nordic Studies in Education, 33, 284–299.
Holm, A.-S., & Lundahl, L. (2019). A Stimulating Competition at the Swedish Upper Secondary School Market? In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education. Lessons from Sweden (pp. 141–155). New York: Routledge.
Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2011). “Living with the Market Forces”: Principals’ Perceptions of Market Competition in Swedish Upper Secondary School. EducationInquiry, 2(4), 601–617.
Lidström, L., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2014). Maximising Opportunity and Minimizing Risk? Young People’s Upper Secondary School Choices in Swedish Quasi-markets. Young, 22(1), 1–20.
Lindbäck, J., & Sernhede, O. (2013). Divided City – Divided School: Upper Secondary School Students and Urban Space. In G. Gudmundsson, D. Beach, & V. Vestel (Eds.), Youth and Marginalization. Young People from Immigrant Families in Scandinavia (pp. 155–179). London: Tufnell Press.
Lindgren, J. (2010). Spaces of Social Inclusion and Exclusion. A Spatial Approach to Education Restructuring and Identity in Sweden. Education Inquiry, 1(2), 75–95.
Lund, S. (2008). Choice Paths in the Swedish Upper Secondary Education: A Critical Discourse Analysisof Recent Reforms. Journal of Education Policy, 23(6), 633–648.
Lund, S. (2015). School Choice, Ethnic Divisions and Symbolic Boundaries. New York: Palgrave Pivot.
Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational Marketization the Swedish Way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 497–517.
Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2014). Gymnasiet som marknad. Umeå: Boréa.
OECD. (2014). When Is Competition Between Schools Beneficial? PISA in Focus 2014/08. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/PISA-in-Focus-N42-(eng)FINAL.pdf
Öhrn, E. (2011). Class and Ethnicity at Work: Segregation and Conflict in a Swedish Secondary School. Education Inquiry, 2(2), 345–357.
Öhrn, E. (2012). Urban Education and Segregation: The Responses from Young People. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 45–57.
Östh, J., Andersson, E., & Malmberg, Ö. (2013). School Choice and Increasing Performance Difference: A Counterfactual Approach. Urban Studies, 50(2), 407–425.
Reay, D., David, M. E., & Ball, S. J. (2005). Degrees of Choice. Social Class, Race and Gender in Higher Education. London: Trenthams Books Limited.
SFS. (2010:800). The Swedish Education Act. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.
Skolverket. (2012). Likvärdig utbildning i svensk grundskola? En kvantitativ analys av likvärdighet över tid. Rapport374. Stockholm: Fritzes.
Skolverket. (2013). Det svåra valet. Stockholm: Fritzes.
Skolverket. (2018). Analyser av familjebakgrundens betydelse för skolresultaten och skillnader mellan skolor. Stockholm: Fritzes.
Söderström, M., & Uusitalo, R. (2005). School Choice and Segregation: Evidence from an Admission Reform. Working Paper. IFAU (2005:7).
Swedish Research Council. (2011). God Forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådets Rapportserie1: 2011.
Wallström, H. (2018). Gymnasielärares mentorshandlingar. En verksamhetsteoretisk studie om lärararbete i förändring. Göteborg: Acta: Gothenburgesis Universitatis.
Whitty, G. (2001). Education, Social Class and Social Exclusion. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 287–295.
Wikström, C., & Wikström, M. (2005). Grade Inflation and School Competition. An Empirical Analysis Based on the Swedish Upper Secondary Schools. Economics and Education Review, 24(3), 309–322.
Yang Hansen, K., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Causes of Educational Segregation in Sweden – School Choice or Residential Segregation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(1–2), 23–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holm, AS., Dovemark, M. (2020). School Choice, We-Ness and School Culture. In: Lund, S. (eds) Immigrant Incorporation, Education, and the Boundaries of Belonging. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36729-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36729-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36728-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36729-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)