Skip to main content

Abstract

The chapter focuses on how school choice processes construct symbolic boundaries between student groups at two high schools in a Swedish urban city. Ash Public is an “immigrant school” on the city’s outskirts, and Beech Ltd. is a white middle-class school in the city center. The study analyzes how the relation between the schools’ student body composition, rumors, and ways of defining values and social characteristics structures the students’ feelings of belonging (or not belonging) to the specific school culture. The study shows that the constructions of “we” and “them” emerge as real obstacles for contacts between the Ash Public and Beech Ltd. students. Although their schools are located in the same city, they seem in many ways to be “worlds apart”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All names of places, schools, and individuals are fictional.

  2. 2.

    The empirical data was collected in 2014 within the Swedish research project Inclusive and competitive? Working in the intersection between social inclusion and marketization in high school (2012–2015), financed by the Swedish Research Council.

  3. 3.

    In upper secondary education in Sweden, there are 18 national programs: six higher education preparatory and 12 vocational. In addition, there are five introductory programs for students who are not eligible for a national program.

References

  • Alexander, J. C. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (2013). Struggling Over the Mode of Incorporation: Backlash Against Multiculturalism in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(4), 531–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asp Onsjö, L., & Holm, A.-S. (2014). Governance by Marks: An Ethnographic Study of School Achievements and Gender. In A. Arnesen, E. Lahelma, E. Öhrn, & L. Lundahl (Eds.), Fair and Competitive? Critical Perspectives on Contemporary Nordic Schooling (pp. 61–81). Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I Heard It on the Grapevine’: Hot Knowledge and School Choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19, 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barmark, M., & Lund, S. (2016). How School Choice Leads to Segregation: An Analysis of Structural Boundaries at Play. In E. Harvey (Ed.), Secondary Education: Perspectives, Global Issues and Challenges (pp. 67–86). New York: Nova Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2007). Education and the Commodity Problem: Ethnographic Investigations of Creativity and Performativity in Swedish Schools. London: Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2009). Making Right Choices: An Ethnographic Investigation of Creativity and Performativity in Swedish Schools. Oxford Review of Education, 35(6), 689–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2011). Twelve Years of Upper-Secondary Education in Sweden: The Beginnings of a Neo-liberal Policy Hegemony? Educational Review, 64(4), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D., & Dovemark, M. (2019). Equity and Choice for Newly Arrived Migrants. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education. Lessons from Sweden (pp. 33–48). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1999). Official Knowledge and Pedagogic Identities. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research and Critique (Rev. ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhlmark, A., Holmlund, H., & Lindahl, M. (2015). School Choice and Segregation: Evidence from Sweden. IFAU Working Paper 2015:8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunar, A., & Ambrose, A. (2018). Urban polarisering och marknadens förlorare. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Skolan, marknaden och framtiden (pp. 169–185). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunar, N. (2008). The Free Schools “Riddle”: Between Traditional Social Democratic, Neoliberal and Multicultural Tenets. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunar, N. (2010). The Controlled School Market and Urban Schools in Sweden. Journal of School Choice, 4(1), 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovemark, M. (2013). How Private ‘Everyday Racism’ and Public ‘Racism Denial’ Contribute to Unequal and Discriminatory Educational Experiences. Ethnography and Education, 8(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovemark, M. (2017). Utbildning till salu: konkurrens, differentiering och varumärke. Utbildning & Demokrati, 26(1), 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovemark, M., & Holm, A.-S. (2015). Förortens skola – Möjligheternas skola? Utbildning & Lärande, 9(1), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovemark, M., & Holm, A.-S. (2017). Pedagogic Identities for Sale. Segregation and Homogenizationin Swedish Upper Secondary School. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 518–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjellman, A.-M. (2019). School Choice, Space and the Geography of Marketization – Analyses of Educational Restructuring in Upper Secondary Educationin Sweden. Göteborgs Universitet. Acta: Gothenburgesis Universitatis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, H. (2018). Gymnasieval och segregation. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Skolan, marknaden och framtiden (pp. 203–225). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson, G., Beach, D., & Vestel, V. (Eds.). (2013). Youth and Marginalization. Young People from Immigrant Families in Scandinavia. London: Tufnell press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harling, M. (2019). School Fairs as the Market Place of Education. In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education. Lessons from Sweden (pp. 170–182). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, P., & Sparkes, A. C. (1997). Careership: A Sociological Theory of Career Decision Making. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, A.-S. (2013). A Sea of Options. Student Perspectives on Market Competition in Upper-secondary Schools in Sweden. Nordic Studies in Education, 33, 284–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, A.-S., & Lundahl, L. (2019). A Stimulating Competition at the Swedish Upper Secondary School Market? In M. Dalstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education. Lessons from Sweden (pp. 141–155). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2011). “Living with the Market Forces”: Principals’ Perceptions of Market Competition in Swedish Upper Secondary School. EducationInquiry, 2(4), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidström, L., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2014). Maximising Opportunity and Minimizing Risk? Young People’s Upper Secondary School Choices in Swedish Quasi-markets. Young, 22(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbäck, J., & Sernhede, O. (2013). Divided City – Divided School: Upper Secondary School Students and Urban Space. In G. Gudmundsson, D. Beach, & V. Vestel (Eds.), Youth and Marginalization. Young People from Immigrant Families in Scandinavia (pp. 155–179). London: Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, J. (2010). Spaces of Social Inclusion and Exclusion. A Spatial Approach to Education Restructuring and Identity in Sweden. Education Inquiry, 1(2), 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, S. (2008). Choice Paths in the Swedish Upper Secondary Education: A Critical Discourse Analysisof Recent Reforms. Journal of Education Policy, 23(6), 633–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, S. (2015). School Choice, Ethnic Divisions and Symbolic Boundaries. New York: Palgrave Pivot.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational Marketization the Swedish Way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 497–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2014). Gymnasiet som marknad. Umeå: Boréa.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). When Is Competition Between Schools Beneficial? PISA in Focus 2014/08. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/PISA-in-Focus-N42-(eng)FINAL.pdf

  • Öhrn, E. (2011). Class and Ethnicity at Work: Segregation and Conflict in a Swedish Secondary School. Education Inquiry, 2(2), 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhrn, E. (2012). Urban Education and Segregation: The Responses from Young People. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östh, J., Andersson, E., & Malmberg, Ö. (2013). School Choice and Increasing Performance Difference: A Counterfactual Approach. Urban Studies, 50(2), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., David, M. E., & Ball, S. J. (2005). Degrees of Choice. Social Class, Race and Gender in Higher Education. London: Trenthams Books Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • SFS. (2010:800). The Swedish Education Act. Stockholm: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket. (2012). Likvärdig utbildning i svensk grundskola? En kvantitativ analys av likvärdighet över tid. Rapport374. Stockholm: Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket. (2013). Det svåra valet. Stockholm: Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket. (2018). Analyser av familjebakgrundens betydelse för skolresultaten och skillnader mellan skolor. Stockholm: Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, M., & Uusitalo, R. (2005). School Choice and Segregation: Evidence from an Admission Reform. Working Paper. IFAU (2005:7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Research Council. (2011). God Forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådets Rapportserie1: 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallström, H. (2018). Gymnasielärares mentorshandlingar. En verksamhetsteoretisk studie om lärararbete i förändring. Göteborg: Acta: Gothenburgesis Universitatis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (2001). Education, Social Class and Social Exclusion. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, C., & Wikström, M. (2005). Grade Inflation and School Competition. An Empirical Analysis Based on the Swedish Upper Secondary Schools. Economics and Education Review, 24(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Hansen, K., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Causes of Educational Segregation in Sweden – School Choice or Residential Segregation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(1–2), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann-Sofie Holm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holm, AS., Dovemark, M. (2020). School Choice, We-Ness and School Culture. In: Lund, S. (eds) Immigrant Incorporation, Education, and the Boundaries of Belonging. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36729-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36729-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36728-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36729-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics