Abstract
The explanations for the positive effects of less repetitive practice in learning, compared to more repetitive practice, converge towards an idea of a greater memory strengthening in less repetitive practice. These benefits are associated with the AMPA glutamate receptor. However, there are no studies in the literature that explain, in molecular terms, how memory processes during practice (or acquisition) are associated with these benefits. Overall, the process of memory strengthening in the acquisition of a motor skill has two distinct stages: a fast initial performance improvement followed by a gradual change associated with the memory state termed slow learning. Computational models, like the multi-rate learning model, help to identify these two distinct stages (fast and slow learning). This study aimed to investigate if the AMPA receptors are associated with the memory’s fast state (fast learning) and slow state (slow learning). Mice (n = 30) practiced the rotarod in two days of constant (one rotation frequency) or varied (three different rotation frequencies) practice. Animals were tested both 24 h and 10 days after acquisition. Two analyses were conducted, stepwise discriminant analysis and analysis of the difference between the predicted and observed values. Varied practice was more associated with the slow state. The findings of the present study advance in the explanations of the molecular mechanisms underpinning the greater memory strengthening proposed by behavioral hypotheses. Furthermore, we propose an alternative explanation for the explanations formulated at behavioral level, highlighting the role of the reference of the error that is produced trial-to-trial.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Lee, T.D., Swanson, L.R., Hall, A.L.: What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Phys. Ther. 71, 150–156 (1991)
Shea, C.H., Kohl, R., Indermill, C.: Contextual interference: contributions of practice. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 73, 145–157 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90076-R
Moxley, S.E.E.: Schema: the variability of practice hypothesis. J. Mot. Behav. 11, 65–70 (1979)
Shea, J.B., Morgan, R.L.: Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J. Exp. Psychol. 5, 179–187 (1979)
Lee, T., Magill, R.: The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 9, 730–746 (1983)
Apolinário-Souza, T., Santos Almeida, A.F., Lelis-Torres, N., Parma, J.O., Pereira, G.S., Lage, G.M.: Molecular mechanisms associated with the benefits of variable practice in motor learning. J. Mot. Behav. 51, 1–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2019.1649997
Tabone, C.J., Ramaswami, M.: Is NMDA receptor-coincidence detection required for learning and memory? Neuron 74, 767–769 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.008
Zito, K.: NMDA receptor function and physiological modulation. In: Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, pp. 1157–1164 (2009)
Lisman, J.E.: Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man’s land. J. Physiol. 532, 285 (2001)
Lisman, J., Yasuda, R., Raghavachari, S.: Mechanisms of CaMKII action in long-term potentiation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 2166–2171 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3192
Rumpel, S., Ledoux, J., Zador, A., Malinow, R.: Postsynaptic receptor trafficking underlying a form of associative learning. Science 308, 83–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103944
Karni, A., et al.: The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 861–868 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.861
Smith, M.A., Ghazizadeh, A., Shadmehr, R.: Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol. 4, 1035–1043 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040179
Ungerleider, L., Doyon, J., Karni, A.: Imaging brain plasticity during motor skill learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 78, 553–564 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/nlme.2002.4091
Thoroughman, K.A., Shadmehr, R.: Learning of action trough adaptative combination of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35037588.Learning
Scheidt, R.A., Dingwell, J.B., Mussa-ivaldi, F.A., Robert, A., Dingwell, J.B., Ferdinando, A.: Learning to Move Amid Uncertainty. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 971–985 (2001). citeulike-article-id:406856
Albert, S.T., Shadmehr, R.: Estimating properties of the fast and slow adaptive processes during sensorimotor adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 119, 1367–1393 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00197.2017
Bradford, M.M.: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Grosshans, D.R., Clayton, D.A., Coultrap, S.J., Browning, M.D.: LTP leads to rapid surface expression of NMDA but not AMPA receptors in adult rat CA1. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 27–33 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn779
Trewartha, K.M., Garcia, A., Wolpert, D.M., Flanagan, J.R.: Fast but fleeting: adaptive motor learning processes associated with aging and cognitive decline. J. Neurosci. 34, 13411–13421 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1489-14.2014
Schweighofer, N., et al.: Mechanisms of the contextual interference effect in individuals poststroke. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 2632–2641 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00399.2011
Lage, G.M., Vieira, M.M., Palhares, L., Ugrinowitsch, H., Benda, R.: Practice schedules and number of skills as contextual interference factors in the learning of positioning timing tasks. J. Hum. Mov. Stud. 50, 185–200 (2006)
Silva, A.B., Lage, G.M., Gonçalves, W., Palhares, L.R., Ugrinowitsch, R., Benda, H.: Contextual interference and manipulation of generalized motor programs and parameters in timing tasks. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 26, 173 (2004)
Schmidt, R.A.: A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol. Rev. 82, 225–260 (1975)
Shea, J.B., Zimny, S.T.: Context effects in memory and learning movement information. Mem. Control Action. 12, 345–365 (1983)
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) (grant APQ-03305-15) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES), finance Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Apolinário-Souza, T. et al. (2019). Association Between Fast and Slow Learning and Molecular Processes in Repetitive Practice: A Post Hoc Analysis. In: Cota, V., Barone, D., Dias, D., Damázio, L. (eds) Computational Neuroscience. LAWCN 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1068. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36636-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36636-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36635-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36636-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)